Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inferences on the effects of geometries and heat transfer fluids in multi-cavity solar receivers by using CFD

  • Renewable Energy and Water Sustainability
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses about the design and analysis of a novel multi-cavity tubular receiver developed for small- and medium-scale concentrated solar power applications from the existing basic baffle-plated volumetric receiver model which is used in large-scale applications. The design and analysis work has been completed to enhance the thermal performance of cavity receivers for the average solar power input of 12 kW with a dish concentrator of 15 m2 aperture area. This was carried out by replacing the baffle plates from the conventional basic volumetric receiver with multi-cavity tubes, keeping the heat transfer area as constant. The tubular arrangement improves the flow and heat transfer characteristics through minimized pressure drop. The receiver models with aluminum, copper, and silicon carbide materials have been analyzed using commercially available CFD software ANSYS-FLUENT for different flow rates of air and water. The computational analysis reveals that the thermal performance of a modified multi-cavity tubular receiver model made up of SiC material is better than receiver model with aluminum and copper materials. The maximum energy efficiency of 21.11% and 75.81% are achieved by the heat transfer fluids air and water, respectively. The maximum efficiency is achieved at the flow rate of 1.35 l/min and 0.9 l/min for the heat transfer fluids air and water, respectively. The study concludes that the multi-cavity tubular configurations may be well suited for small-scale CSP applications than the volumetric receivers with foams, rods, honeycomb, and baffle-plated structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A ref :

area of the reflector (m2)

A R eff :

effective area of the receiver (m2)

CFD:

computation fluid dynamics

C av :

specific heat capacity (J kg−1 K−1)

DNI:

direct normal irradiation (W m−2)

ui, uj :

velocity components (m s−1)

x, y :

rectangular coordinates components (m)

λ :

thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1)

μ :

dynamic viscosity (kg m−1 s−1)

ρ :

density of the fluid (kg m−3)

σ :

turbulent Prandtl number

τ :

wall shear stress (kg m−1)

i, j :

components

t :

turbulent

E a :

energy rate on the receiver (kW)

E R :

energy rate gained by HTFs (kW)

E S :

power on the reflector from sun (kJ)

E x :

exergy rate (kW)

E xs-D :

exergy rate from sun to dish (kW)

HTF:

heat transfer fluid

K B :

Boltzmann constant (1.381 × 10−23 J/K)

:

mass flow rate of HTFs (lpm)

Nu:

Nusselt number

Re:

Reynolds number

T atm :

atmospheric temperature (K)

T avg :

average wall temperature (K)

T in :

fluid inlet temperature (°C)

T out :

fluid outlet temperature (°C)

η EnR :

receiver energy efficiency

η ExR :

receiver exergy efficiency

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the Easwari Engineering College for the rendered design and analysis software facilities and further support from B. S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, where the remaining part of this work has been completed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajendran Duraisamy Ramalingam.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duraisamy Ramalingam, R., Esakkimuthu, G.S., Paulraj, J. et al. Inferences on the effects of geometries and heat transfer fluids in multi-cavity solar receivers by using CFD. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 32205–32217 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06829-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06829-w

Keywords

Navigation