Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to explore the role of globalization on ecological footprint in Turkey while controlling energy consumption, economic growth, and trade openness. To achieve this objective, we employ dual adjustment approach. The main novelty of the dual adjustment approach is that the method offers another path to the cointegration analysis by relaxing the implicit assumption of the singular adjustment in cointegration analysis. The findings clearly reveal that (i) in the long run, globalization impacts ecological footprint positively and (ii) trade openness reduces ecological footprint in the short run, while ecological footprint is negatively affected by GDP growth in both the short and the long run. In terms of policy implications, this study suggests that in order to improve the environmental quality, Turkey should adopt such policies that encourage energy consumers to shift toward renewable energy. Moreover, the government should take necessary steps to diversify the overall energy mix toward renewable energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the World Bank.

Notes

  1. Middle East and North Africa countries

References

  • Adebayo TS (2020) Revisiting the EKC hypothesis in an emerging market: an application of ARDL-based bounds and wavelet coherence approaches. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–13

  • Adebayo TS, Akinsola GD (2021) Investigating the causal linkage among economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Thailand: an application of the wavelet coherence approach. Int J Renew Energy Development 10(1):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adedoyin FF, Gumede MI, Bekun FV, Etokakpan MU, Balsalobre-lorente D (2020) Modelling coal rent, economic growth and CO2 emissions: does regulatory quality matter in BRICS economies? Sci Total Environ 710:136284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A, Umar M, Khan Z, Muhammad S (2020) The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: an advanced panel data estimation. Resources Policy 69:101817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Mahmood F, Hafeez M, Ali N (2019) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(18):18565–18582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alola AA, Kirikkaleli D (2019) The nexus of environmental quality with renewable consumption, immigration, and healthcare in the US: wavelet and gradual-shift causality approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(34):35208–35217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apaydın Ş (2020) Effects of globalization on ecological footprint: the case of Turkey. J Res Econ Polit Finance 5(1):23–42. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.695836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awosusi AA, Adeshola I, Adebayo TS (2020) Determinants of CO2 emissions in emerging markets: an empirical evidence from MINT economies. Int J Renew Energy Dev 9(3):441–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter M, King RG (1999) Measuring business cycles: approximate band-pass filters for economic time series. Rev Econ Stat 81(4):575e593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili F, Ulucak R, Koçak E, İlkay SÇ (2020) Does globalization matter for environmental sustainability? Empirical investigation for Turkey by Markov regime switching models. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(1):1087–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiano LJ, ve Fitzgerald TJ (2003) The band pass filter. Int Econ Rev 44(2):435–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA (2004) Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecol Econ 48(1):71–81

  • Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher A, Gaston N, Martens P (2008) Measuring globalisation. Gauging its consequences Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ersoy E, Ugurlu A (2020) The potential of Turkey's province-based livestock sector to mitigate GHG emissions through biogas production. J Environ Manag 255:109858

  • Figge L, Oebels K, Offermans A (2017) The effects of globalization on ecological footprints: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 19(3):863–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godil DI, Sharif A, Rafique S, Jermsittiparsert K (2020) The asymmetric effect of tourism, financial development, and globalization on ecological footprint in Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSA (2019) Fossil Fuel Emission [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.globalcarbonatlas.org/en/CO2-emissions

  • Gygli S, Haelg F, Potrafke N, Sturm JE (2019) The KOF globalisation index–revisited. The Review of International Organizations 14(3):543–574

  • Hao LN, Umar M, Khan Z, Ali W (2020) Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: how critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? Sci Total Environ 752:141853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasanov FJ, Liddle B, Mikayilov JI (2018) The impact of international trade on CO2 emissions in oil exporting countries: territory vs consumption emissions accounting. Energy Econ 74:343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismihan M (2019) The dual adjustment approach with an application to the consumption function. Cent Bank Rev 19(2019):1e8

    Google Scholar 

  • Jianqiang GU, Umar M, Soran S, Yue XG (2020) Exacerbating effect of energy prices on resource curse: can research and development be a mitigating factor? Resour Policy 67:101689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmaz DB, Kirikkaleli D (2019) Modeling CO 2 emissions in an emerging market: empirical finding from ARDL-based bounds and wavelet coherence approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(5):5210–5220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kassouri Y, Altıntaş H (2020) Human well-being versus ecological footprint in MENA countries: a trade-off? J Environ Manag 263:110405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan Z, Ali S, Umar M, Kirikkaleli D, Jiao Z (2020) Consumption-based carbon emissions and international trade in G7 countries: the role of environmental innovation and renewable energy. Sci Total Enviro 730:138945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirikkaleli D (2020) New insights into an old issue: exploring the nexus between economic growth and CO 2 emissions in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler W (2004) International outsourcing and factor prices with multistage production. Econ J 114(494):C166–C185

  • Leal PH, Marques AC, Shahbaz M (2020) The role of globalisation, de jure and de facto, on environmental performance: evidence from developing and developed countries. Environ Dev Sustain 1–20

  • Lee KH, Min B (2015) Green R and D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. J Clean Prod 108:534–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liddle B (2018) Consumption-based accounting and the trade-carbon emissions nexus. Energy Econ 69:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad B (2019) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in developed, emerging and Middle East and North Africa countries. Energy 179:232–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odugbesan JA, Adebayo TS (2020) Modeling CO2 emissions in South Africa: empirical evidence from ARDL based bounds and wavelet coherence techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–13

  • Ravn MO, Uhlig H (2002) On adjusting the Hodrick-Prescott filter for the frequency of observations. Rev Econ Stat 84:371e375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidi K, Hammami S (2015) The impact of CO2 emissions and economic growth on energy consumption in 58 countries. Energy Rep 1:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A (2020) The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. J Clean Prod 250:119518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Haouas I, Van Hoang TH (2019) Economic growth and environmental degradation in Vietnam: is the environmental Kuznets curve a complete picture? Emerg Mark Rev 38:197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Su ZW, Malik MY, Umar M, Khan Z, Khan M (2020) Does green investment, financial development and natural resources rent limit carbon emissions? A provincial panel analysis of China. Sci Total Environ 755:142538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umar M, Ji X, Kirikkaleli D, Xu Q (2020) COP21 roadmap: do innovation, financial development, and transportation infrastructure matter for environmental sustainability in China? J Environ Manag 271:111026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usman O, Akadiri SS, Adeshola I (2020) Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: implications for environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Jiang XT, Ge S, Jiang R (2019) Is economic growth compatible with a reduction in CO2 emissions? Empirical analysis of the United States. Resour Conserv Recycl 151:104443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Chang HL, Rizvi SK, Sari A (2020) Are eco-innovation and export diversification mutually exclusive to control carbon emissions in G-7 countries? J Environ Manag 270:110829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WDI (2019) DATABANK [Data file]. Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators#advancedDownloadOptions

  • White H, Granger CWJ (2011) Consideration of trends in time series. J Time Econom 3:1e38

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2020) Turkey [Data file]. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/country/TR

  • Yilanci V, Gorus MS (2020) Does economic globalization have predictive power for ecological footprint in MENA counties? A panel causality test with a Fourier function. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarsky L (1999) Havens, halos and spaghetti: untangling the evidence about foreign direct investment and the environment. Foreign direct Investment and the Environment 13(8):47–74

  • Zhang YJ, Da YB (2015) The decomposition of energy-related carbon emission and its decoupling with economic growth in China. Renew Sust Energy Rev 41:1255–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zivot E, Andrews D (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock and the unit-root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10(3):251–270

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dervis Kirikkaleli and Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo designed the experiment and collected the dataset. The introduction and literature review sections are written by Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo and Zeeshan Khan. Dervis Kirikkaleli and Shahid Ali constructed the methodology section and empirical outcomes in the study. Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo contributed to the interpretation of the outcomes. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dervis Kirikkaleli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

We confirmed that this manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal. Ethical approval and Informed consent do not applicable for this study.

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent to publish

Not applicable

Additional information

Responsible editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirikkaleli, D., Adebayo, T.S., Khan, Z. et al. Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 14009–14017 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11654-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11654-7

Keywords

Navigation