Abstract
The study’s objective is to examine the relationship between COVID-19 cases, environmental sustainability ratings, and mineral resource rents in a large cross section of 97 countries. The emergence of novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) enlarges its magnitude across the international borders and damages social, economic, and environmental infrastructure with a high rate of human death tolls. The mineral resources are also devastated, which served as a primary raw input into the production system. The adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the environment and mineral resources are studied in a large panel of countries and found that mineral resource rents and population growth improve environmental sustainability rating (ESR). In contrast, an increase in coronavirus cases decreases the rating scale across countries. Further, mineral resources first decrease along with increased COVID-19 cases due to strict government policies, including the mandatory shutdown of economic institutions. Further, mineral resource rents increase later because of resuming economic activities in many parts of the world. The high rate of population growth is another important factor that negatively affects mineral resources across countries. Through impulse response and variance decomposition estimates, an exacerbated coronavirus cases and population growth would likely negatively affect ESR and mineral resources. In contrast, COVID-19 recovered cases will likely play a more significant role in securing mineral resources over time. Therefore, the global mineral resource conservation policies and improving ESR are highly needed during the COVID-19 to keep the significant economic gains in unprecedented times.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Mineral resources played an important role in global productivity. It provides input to the industry to transform natural resources and decarbonize them through an efficient resource extraction process, cleaner energy technologies, and environmental regulations (Nassani et al. 2019). The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are not limited to socioeconomic and environmental resources, while it negatively impacts mineral resource rents. The depletion of the high rate of mineral resources is confined to decrease economic resources; further, it affects the livelihood of the ordinary peoples working in this sector (Hilson et al. 2021 Lee and Bazilian, 2020). Further, the cost of carbon pollution negatively affects general public health, leading to more likely to affect contagious diseases because of the low immune system (Anser et al. 2020b).
The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affects the central commodity prices ranges from 5 to 25%. For instance, the thermal coal price drops down to 23%, followed by 21% metallurgical coal, 19% gold prices, and up to 18% of iron ore. The 10 to 30% currencies devalued in the large mining countries (Azevedo et al. 2020). The ample amount of studies confirmed that the COVID-19 pandemic increases global poverty risk due to high healthcare expenditures, closures of essentials markets, strict lockdown, exacerbated unemployment rate, financial issues, and high disruption of the global food supply chain (Mann 2020; Galanakis 2020; Anser et al. 2020a, b). The economic and environmental resources are directly affected by the increase in global COVID-19 cases that need to be reduced by global strategic policies (Elavarasan et al. 2021; Hale et al. 2021).
The motivation of the study is to work on the stated topic to eye-opening the environmental specialists to devise sustainable and sustained healthcare and mineral resource policies across countries. For instance, Awan (2019) proposed a multilevel environmental governance mechanism for environmental protection that is likely to achieve carbon neutrality agenda. Awan (2020a) further endorsed the need to attain industrial ecology to harmonize the relationship between human and ecological systems for broad-based growth. Awan (2020b) argued that sustainable innovation helps resolve organizational environmental issues and governance issues to achieve a green growth agenda. Smith (2020) argued that the COVID-19 pandemic negatively affects energy and natural resources management. Energy grids and their supply load shifted to household consumption while strict government actions contain coronavirus pandemic temporary shutdown mining industries worldwide. The need to ensure energy supply and resource management is desirable to minimize financial crises during a current pandemic. Maliszewska et al. (2020) concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic largely declines worldwide economic growth below 2% of GDP, subsequently declining domestic and traded tourists’ services. Helm (2020) discussed the short-term and possible long-term environmental consequences that prevail during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results argued that although short-term results show some positive impact of air quality improvement in GHG emissions reduction, its effect on biodiversity and environmental regulations remains in question in a given time. The negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on global economic activities are primarily exhibited. Continued support to monetary and fiscal expansionary measures would likely increase asset pricing, debt levels, and consumption. Thus, the need for efficient economic and environmental policies is imperative to control coronavirus. Corlett et al. (2020) greatly emphasized the need to adapt biodiversity conservation policies to protect natural habitats. During the COVID-19 pandemic, travel and transportation restrictions supported the many precious wildlife animals; however, there are many more things to do to secure our biodiversity, including reducing air pollution, noise pollution, water pollution, and GHG emissions. All these factors would need urgent attention during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Berchin and de Andrade (2020) concluded that due to becoming a global village, the impacts and intensity of the COVID-19 pandemic greatly exacerbated to all across the globe, which confined the economic infrastructure while its effect environmental sustainability agenda worldwide. Karatayev and Hall (2020) discussed the volatility of oil price shocks in resource-rich countries that negatively impact non-resource sectors. The COVID-19 pandemic also puts tremendous pressure on natural resources that need sound economic and environmental policies to contain the current pandemic and conserve natural resources. Pradhan et al. (2020) concluded that silver and gold are considered safe havens to Indian investors. They moved in a risk-off environment until it increases coronavirus cases in a country. Table 1 shows the earlier literature on environment and resource degradation during the pandemic crisis worldwide.
The contribution of the study is twofold. First, the study assessed the role of mineral resource rents and the COVID-19 pandemic on improving ESR. Second, it assessed the impact of COVID-19 cases and population growth on mineral resource rents in a large cross-section of 97 countries at one point in time. The earlier studies mainly included different environmental pollution in the COVID-19 framework (see Pei et al. 2020; Zhu et al. 2020; Frontera et al. 2020; Jiang et al. 2020) while ignored the more comprehensive policy variable related to ESR during the pandemic recession. This variable is essential, as it described the country’s overall rating towards achieving environmental sustainability from a policy perspective (Anser et al. 2021b). Furthermore, the commodity-producing sector is also negatively affected by the high COVID-19 cases due to adopting strict lockdown measures and maintaining social distancing in the mining, which affects their working conditions and livelihood to escape poverty. Therefore, the following research questions need to be tested in both the given scenario; i.e., does efficient resource extraction support ESR? This question argued that the exhaustion of mineral resources and their waste negatively affects the environment that needs to deploy technological upgradation and knowledge transfer to extract mineral resources efficiently. Further, to what extent do COVID-19 cases negatively affect ESR? The question highlighted that contagious diseases could quickly spread in an atmosphere that affects the general public’s health. Hence, it is vital to improving environmental quality to reduce the susceptibility of coronavirus cases across countries. Finally, does the growing population negatively affect mineral resources and ESR? The question argued that high population growth jeopardy for conserving mineral resources. In contrast, due to social and close contact between the population members, coronavirus cases worldwide are likely to exacerbate.
Based on the significant discussion, the study has the following research objectives, i.e.:
-
i)
To examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on environment sustainability rating and mineral resources in a panel of 97 countries
-
ii)
To analyze the role of mineral resources and population growth on environmental reforms across countries
-
iii)
To substantiate the hump-shaped relationship between COVID-19 cases and mineral resources
-
iv)
To investigate the forecast relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and environment and resource degradation over time
The study used “Markov switching regression” on different regimes to assume a common factor of COVID recovered cases to evaluate the dynamic relationship between COVID registered cases, death cases, and population growth using a broad panel of heterogeneous countries for sound inferences.
Data source and methodological framework
The study used the following variables, i.e., environmental sustainability rating (ESR) fall in the range of 0 and 6. The lowest value shows a low rating, while the highest value shows a high sustainable rating. Unfortunately, the data is missing in many sample countries that have been filled by the lowest obtain the value of 2.5 rating scale among the sample countries. The study further used coronavirus registered cases (denoted by CASES), death cases (denoted by DEATH), and recovered cases (denoted by RECOV) as regressors, whereas mineral resource rents (denoted by MRENT) (% of GDP) served as a “response variable” in one equation while a regressor served in another regression equation. In addition, the total population (denoted by POP) was used as a control variable for the COVID-19 pandemic, ESR, and mineral resource rents in a panel of 97 countries. The data of the COVID-19 pandemic is taken from Worldometer (2020), whereas the latest data are available for mineral resource rents and ESPR taken from World Bank (2020). Table 9 in the appendix shows the sample of countries used in this study for ready reference.
The study used the following two equations to analyze the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on ESR and mineral resources, i.e.,
where ESR shows environmental sustainability rating, MRENT represent mineral resource rents, CASES represent COVID registered cases, SQCASES represent the square of CASES, DEATH represents COVID total death, RECOV shows total recovered cases, POP represents total population, “ln” represent natural logarithm, “i and t” represent 97 countries and 2020 time period respectively, and ƹ represents error term.
Equation 1 shows that COVID cases and their square term will expect to show an inverted U-shaped relationship between them. In contrast, COVID death cases and recovered cases will likely have a negative and positive impact on mineral resources across countries. The total population growth is assumed to decrease mineral resources. Equation 2 assumed that mineral resource rents improve ESR, whereas increasing COVID-19 cases and population growth decreases ESR across countries. Figure 1 shows the research framework of the study.
Figure 1 shows that the COVID-19 pandemic and population explosion are expected to have the main detrimental factors of mineral resource depletion. The higher the COVID-19 cases and population growth, the higher the likelihood of negatively affecting mineral resource rents, which need unified global resource conservation strategies to contain coronavirus pandemic across countries. Further, the greater increase in the case-fatality ratio is likely to bring down ESR while it improves by increasing mineral resource rents across countries. The following hypotheses have been proposed under the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e.:
-
H1: ESR can likely be improved by increasing mineral resource rents and minimizing coronavirus cases.
-
H2: COVID-19 cases first increase and decrease mineral resource rents to exhibit an inverted U-shaped relationship between them.
-
H2: There will be an adverse effect of coronavirus death cases and population explosion on mineral resource rents.
-
H3: An increasing number of coronavirus recovered cases will likely resume economic activities that would be helpful to conserve mineral resources.
The study used cross-sectional regression and Markov switching regression to assess the relationship between COVID-19 registered cases, death cases, population growth, and mineral resource rents in one equation, while assessing the dynamic impact of mineral resources resource rents COVID-19 cases on ESR in another regression. Further, the study used impulse response function (IRF) and variance decomposition analysis (VDA) to analyze the forecast relationship between the stated variables over a time horizon.
Results and discussion
Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics of the candidate variables. The mean value of ESR is 2.778 that shows the overall environmental sustainability reforms are weaker, leading to a negative effect on the healthcare sustainability agenda across countries. The mean value of mineral resource rents is 2.545% of GDP with a positively skewed distribution and a prominent distribution peak. The maximum value of COVID-19 cases is 2,637,077 (USA), the minimum value of registered cases is 170 (Burundi), and the average value is 88,315.23. The coronavirus death and recovered cases are higher in the USA, i.e., 128,437 and 1,093,456, respectively. The average value of the total population in the given sample is about 68,572,175.
Table 3 shows the Markov switching regression estimates and found that COVID-19 cases first decrease mineral resource rents in the early phase of exacerbation of coronavirus cases; later, when economic activities begin to resume, mineral resource rents essentially decrease, verifying the U-shaped relationship between the two variables. The death cases reported due to the coronavirus pandemic cannot signify its relationship with mineral resource rents at both regimes. The total population exhibits a negative relationship with mineral resource rents across countries. Lee and Bazilian (2020) showed that due to the COVID-19 pandemic, most resource-dependent countries are critical to fall out the supply of critical minerals. For instance, the USA heavily relies on a transborder critical minerals supply chain disrupted in the current pandemic to develop domestic critical mineral resources through the defense production act. Chadha (2020) emphasized the need to ensure an efficient supply chain of critical minerals during the COVID-19 pandemic to advance the clean energy agenda. Sappor et al. (2020) showed the volatility in the prices of the base metals during the COVID-19 pandemic that substantially decreases since the beginning of the pandemic due to a more significant decline in the consumption of copper, zinc, iron, ore, lead, cobalt, lithium, etc., across the metals and mining industry. Copper prices have fallen larger than the other stated metals, i.e., 22% starting from the 2020 year, followed by nickel, ore, lead, zinc, and iron prices that fallen between the range of 10 to 20%, while lithium and cobalt prices are fallen to 8% and 5% respectively, over the same period. The number of earlier studies is also in line with the estimated results in different economic settings, for instance, Anser et al. (2021a), Everard et al. (2020), and Golar et al. (2020). These studies confirmed the volatility in natural resources in account of an increased COVID-19 pandemic worldwide.
Figure 2 shows the U-shaped relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and mineral resource rents. The relationship confirmed that COVID registered cases initially decrease mineral resource rents due to mandatory lockdown industries and associated infrastructure nationwide. In contrast, mineral resource rents increase later due to resuming social and economic activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The importance of the stated result yields sounds resource conservation policies that are imperative for long-term sustained growth.
Table 4 shows the cross-sectional regression estimates and found a less elastic relationship between mineral resource rents and ESR with an elasticity estimate of 0.014 percentage points. The result implies that mineral rents help improve ESR due to efficient resource extraction and minimizing resource wastes. On the other hand, COVID-19 cases disrupted the ESR agenda due to inadequate healthcare infrastructure and meagre environmental reforms. However, the greater increase in population growth positively changes the ESR agenda because of the population ingenuity principle. Arora and Mishra (2020) suggested improving environmental quality to prevent it from a future pandemic; further, it would help move towards green development. Praveena and Aris (2021) argued that achieving environmental sustainability is vital for healthcare sustainability to move forward to escape it from contagious disease. Rume and Islam (2020) concluded that the recent pandemic recession has positive and negative environmental benefits. On the one hand, the adoption of COVID-19 measures helps to improve environmental quality indicators because of the closure of industries. On the other hand, it increases untreated healthcare wastes, which affect the sustainability principles. Further, the number of studies confirmed the estimated results of improving environmental sustainability ratings in the wake of COVID-19 cases and natural resources (see Anser et al. 2021b; Quatrini 2021; Boston 2020).
Table 5 shows the IRF estimates for Eq. 1 and found the differential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mineral resource rents over the time horizon. It is likely that coronavirus registered cases, death cases, and population growth will jeopardize mineral resource rents. In contrast, coronavirus recovered cases over most of the time in a year will likely conserve mineral resources across countries.
Table 6 shows the IRF estimates for Eq. 2 and suggested that coronavirus cases and population growth likely decrease the ESR agenda in the next coming year. In contrast, mineral resource rents are likely to cause a mixed impact on ESR across countries. The result shows that coronavirus cases are likely to negatively affect the environmental sustainability agenda because of high population growth and social compactness among the economic agents.
Table 7 shows the VDA estimates for Eq. 1 and found that the natural logarithm of recovered cases will have a greater magnitude in influencing mineral resource rents with a variance error shock of 3.092%, while the least influenced will be the natural logarithm of death cases on mineral resources over time. The proportion of variance error shocks of the natural logarithm of registered coronavirus cases, death cases, and the total population is about 1.901%, 1.368%, and 1.745%.
Table 8 shows the VDA estimates for Eq. 2 and suggested that coronavirus cases would likely cause a greater change in the ESR agenda, as its estimated variance value of 6.294%. This is followed by mineral resource rents and population growth with estimated values of 0.674% and 0.644%, respectively, for a subsequent year.
Conclusions and policy implications
Environmental and natural resources played a vital role in improving air quality indicators, ultimately increasing sustainable development reforms worldwide. Natural resources supported by economic production play a crucial role in providing raw inputs that help generate economic profit through industrial tradeoffs. The current pandemic disproportionally affects global economic and environmental infrastructure that leads to the economic downturn. The study is motivated to start working in the light of the vulnerability of coronavirus pandemic emerged by using a large panel of countries. The results show that mineral resource rents and population ingenuity principles help improve ESR, whereas an increasing number of coronavirus cases negatively affect the sustainability agenda across countries. Further, an increase in coronavirus cases suppresses mineral resource rents due to strict nationwide strategies. It is further impacting the conservation of mineral resources. In contrast, mineral resources support increasing countries’ economic growth at the later stages by providing raw material to the industrial production that works under the government’s strict guidelines to contain coronavirus; thus, it exhibits the U-shaped relationship between them. The total population is also the jeopardy of mineral resources across countries. The innovation accounting matrix shows that coronavirus cases and population growth likely to cause a greater change in the environmental sustainability agenda. In contrast, coronavirus cases and the death rate will negatively impact mineral resource rents over time.
The COVID-19 pandemic affected the major industries of the countries; further, it affected the mining and resource extraction industries due to abiding by the strict government strategies to contain coronavirus. The minimal workers are engaged working during a pandemic due to maintaining the social distancing between them. Thus, the workflow of many critical mineral resource extractions is slowing down while some mine operators temporarily closed their sites. The mining industry is further dependent upon its logistics supply chain. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the mining industry is affected mainly due to the delayed supply chain of many critical mineral resources importing and exporting to other countries. The travel and transportation restrictions and ceased international borders increase the commodity and metal prices, putting a severe burden on mining industries. Thus, to minimize the supply chain risks of primary mineral resources, the high need for contingencies of resource policies is imperative to keep maintaining the flow of natural resources with the government’s economic policies. The overall discussion comes to the following four policy outcomes, i.e.:
-
i)
Environmental sustainability is imperative for achieving healthcare sustainability and green growth agenda (see, Koondhar et al. 2021; Ahmad et al. 2021; Gyamfi et al. 2021).
-
ii)
An efficient use of natural resources and reducing resource wastes helpful for improving the livelihood of the low-income strata group (Salahuddin et al. 2020; Imran et al. 2021; Goswami and Nautiyal 2020).
-
iii)
The standardized operating procedures to control coronavirus cases required massive healthcare reforms worldwide (Park et al. 2021; Etafa et al. 2021; Mao et al. 2021).
-
iv)
Population ingenuity principle would likely be more supportive to the resource conservation agenda, while it remains needed to become viable in reducing coronavirus cases (Kelley et al. 2021).
-
v)
The use of green energy sources, supply chain management, governing issues, and resource eco-efficiency remains needed caution before adding to the sustainability agenda (Zaman et al. 2016; Awan 2019; Anser et al. 2020b; Awan et al. 2020; Alhawari et al. 2021).
Based on the stated policy recommendations, the study concludes that the environmental sustainability principle can be achieved by improving air quality indicators and resource conservation agenda, vital for better healthcare reforms.
References
Ahmad M, Işık C, Jabeen G, Ali T, Ozturk I, Atchike DW (2021) Heterogeneous links among urban concentration, non-renewable energy use intensity, economic development, and environmental emissions across regional development levels. Science of The Total Environment 765:144527
Alhawari O, Awan U, Bhutta MKS, Ülkü MA (2021) Insights from circular economy literature: a review of extant definitions and unravelling paths to future research. Sustainability 13(2):859. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020859
Ambika S, Basappa U, Singh A, Gonugade V, Tholiya R (2021) Impact of social lockdown due to COVID-19 on environmental and health risk indices in India. Environmental research 196:110932
Anser MK, Yousaf Z, Khan MA, Nassani AA, Alotaibi SM, Abro MMQ et al (2020a) Does communicable diseases (including COVID-19) may increase global poverty risk? A cloud on the horizon. Environmental Research 187:109668
Anser MK, Khan MA, Awan U, Batool R, Zaman K, Imran M, Sasmoko, Indrianti Y, Khan A, Bakar ZA (2020b) The role of technological innovation in a dynamic model of the environmental supply chain curve: evidence from a panel of 102 countries. Processes 8(9):1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8091033
Anser MK, Khan MA, Zaman K, Nassani AA, Askar SE, Abro MMQ, Kabbani A (2021a) Financial development, oil resources, and environmental degradation in pandemic recession: to go down in flames. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15067-y
Anser MK, Usman B, Hyder S, Nassani AA, Askar SE, Zaman K, Abro MMQ (2021b) Does improvement in the environmental sustainability rating help to reduce the COVID-19 cases? Controlling financial development, price level and carbon damages. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13873-y
Arora NK, Mishra J (2020) COVID-19 and importance of environmental sustainability. Environmental Sustainability 3:117–119
Awan U (2019) Effects of buyer-supplier relationship on social performance improvement and innovation performance improvement. International Journal of Applied Management Science 11(1):21–35
Awan U. (2020a) Industrial ecology in support of sustainable development goals. In: Leal Filho W., Azul A.M., Brandli Lözuyar P.G., Wall T. (eds) Responsible consumption and production. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95726-5_18
Awan, U. (2020b). Steering for sustainable development goals: a typology of sustainable innovation. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Wall, T. (eds) Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71059-4_64-1
Awan U, Kraslawski A, Huiskonen J (2020) Progress from blue to the green world: multilevel governance for pollution prevention planning and sustainability. In: Hussain C (ed) Handbook of Environmental Materials Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58538-3_177-1
Azevedo, M., Berbner, J., Crooks, S., Mareels, S., & Nucci, C. (2020). Lessons from the past: Informing the mining industry’s trajectory to the next normal. McKinsey’s Metals & Mining Practice company, online available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/metals-and-mining/our-insights/lessons-from-the-past-informing-the-mining-industrys-trajectory-to-the-next-normal(accessed on 16th August 2021).
Berchin II, de Andrade JBSO (2020) GAIA 3.0: effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on sustainable development and future perspectives. Research in Globalization 2:100014
Boston J (2020) Transforming the economy: why a ‘green recovery’ from Covid-19 is vital. Policy Quarterly 16(3):61–66
Chadha, R. (2020). Report: skewed critical minerals global supply chains post COVID-19. Online available at: https://www.brookings.edu/research/skewed-critical-minerals-global-supply-chains-post-covid-19/ (accessed on 12th July, 2020).
Corlett RT, Primack RB, Devictor V, Maas B, Goswami VR, Bates AE et al (2020) Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 246:108571
Edward JP, Jayanthi M, Malleshappa H, Jeyasanta KI, Laju RL, Patterson J et al (2021) COVID-19 lockdown improved the health of coastal environment and enhanced the population of reef-fish. Marine Pollution Bulletin 165:112124
Elavarasan RM, Pugazhendhi R, Jamal T, Dyduch J, Arif MT, Kumar NM et al (2021) Envisioning the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) through the lens of energy sustainability (SDG 7) in the post-COVID-19 world. Applied Energy 292:116665
Etafa W, Gadisa G, Jabessa S, Takele T (2021) Healthcare workers’ compliance and its potential determinants to prevent COVID-19 in public hospitals in Western Ethiopia. BMC Infectious Diseases 21(1):1–8
Everard M, Johnston P, Santillo D, Staddon C (2020) The role of ecosystems in mitigation and management of Covid-19 and other zoonoses. Environmental Science & Policy 111:7–17
Frontera A, Cianfanelli L, Vlachos K, Landoni G, Cremona G (2020) Severe air pollution links to higher mortality in COVID-19 patients: The “double-hit” hypothesis. Journal of Infection 81(2):255–259
Galanakis CM (2020) The food systems in the Era of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic crisis. Foods 9(4):523. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9040523
Ganguly R, Sharma D, Kumar P (2021) Short-term impacts of air pollutants in three megacities of India during COVID-19 lockdown. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01434-9
Golar G, Malik A, Muis H, Herman A, Nurudin N, Lukman L (2020) The social-economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic: implications for potential forest degradation. Heliyon 6(10):e05354
Gonzalez-Perez MA, Mohieldin M, Hult GTM, Velez-Ocampo J (2021) COVID-19, sustainable development challenges of Latin America and the Caribbean, and the potential engines for an SDGs-based recovery. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management 19(1):22–37
Goswami, M., & Nautiyal, S. (2020). Transitional peri-urban landscape and use of natural resource for livelihoods. In Socio-economic and eco-biological dimensions in resource use and conservation (pp. 435-457). Springer, Cham.
Gyamfi BA, Ozturk I, Bein MA, Bekun FV (2021) An investigation into the anthropogenic effect of biomass energy utilization and economic sustainability on environmental degradation in E7 economies. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 15(3):84–851
Hale T, Angrist N, Goldszmidt R, Kira B, Petherick A, Phillips T, Webster S, Cameron-Blake E, Hallas L, Majumdar S, Tatlow H (2021) A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker). Nature Human Behaviour 5(4):529–538
Helm D (2020) The environmental impacts of the coronavirus. Environmental & Resource Economics 76:21–38
Hilson G, Van Bockstael S, Sauerwein T, Hilson A, McQuilken J (2021) Artisanal and small-scale mining, and COVID-19 in sub-Saharan Africa: a preliminary analysis. World Development 139:105315
Imran M, Khan KB, Zaman K, Musah MB, Sudiapermana E, Aziz ARA, Embong R, Hassan ZB, Jabor MK, Anis SNM (2021) Achieving pro-poor growth and environmental sustainability agenda through information technologies: as right as rain. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28:41000–41015
Jiang Y, Wu XJ, Guan YJ (2020) Effect of ambient air pollutants and meteorological variables on COVID-19 incidence. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 41(9):1011–1015
Karatayev M, Hall S (2020) Establishing and comparing energy security trends in resource-rich exporting nations (Russia and the Caspian Sea region). Resources Policy 68:101746
Kelley KC, Kamler J, Garg M, Stawicki SP (2021) Answering the challenge of COVID-19 pandemic through innovation and ingenuity. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 1318:859–873
Koondhar MA, Shahbaz M, Memon KA, Ozturk I, Kong R (2021) A visualization review analysis of the last two decades for environmental Kuznets curve “EKC” based on co-citation analysis theory and pathfinder network scaling algorithms. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28(13):16690–16706
Maliszewska, M., Mattoo, A., & Van Der Mensbrugghe, D. (2020). The potential impact of COVID-19 on GDP and trade: A preliminary assessment. Online available at: https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-9211 (accessed on 12th July 2020).
Mann, CL (2020). Chapter 8: real and financial lenses to assess the economic consequences of COVID-19. Economics in the Time of COVID-19, Edited by Baldwin, R., & di Mauro, B, W., A VoxEU.org Book, CEPR Press, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, UK.
Mao Q, Xu M, He Q, Li C, Meng S, Wang Y, Cui B, Liang Z, Wang J (2021) COVID-19 vaccines: progress and understanding on quality control and evaluation. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 6(1):1–7
Mell I, Whitten M (2021) Access to nature in a post covid-19 world: opportunities for green infrastructure financing, distribution and equitability in urban planning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(4):1527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041527
Miller-Rushing AJ, Athearn N, Blackford T, Brigham C, Cohen L, Cole-Will R, Edgar T, Ellwood ER, Fisichelli N, Pritz CF, Gallinat AS, Gibson A, Hubbard A, McLane S, Nydick K, Primack RB, Sachs S, Super PE (2021) COVID-19 pandemic impacts on conservation research, management, and public engagement in US national parks. Biological Conservation 257:109038
Nassani AA, Awan U, Zaman K, Hyder S, Aldakhil AM, Abro MMQ (2019) Management of natural resources and material pricing: Global evidence. Resources Policy 64:101500
Park, J. J., Mogg, R., Smith, G. E., Nakimuli-Mpungu, E., Jehan, F., Rayner, C. R., ... & Mills, E. J. (2021). How COVID-19 has fundamentally changed clinical research in global health. The Lancet Global Health, 9(5), e711-e720.
Pei Z, Han G, Ma X, Su H, Gong W (2020) Response of major air pollutants to COVID-19 lockdowns in China. Science of the Total Environment 743:140879
Pradhan AK, Mishra BR, Tiwari AK, Hammoudeh S (2020) Macroeconomic factors and frequency domain causality between gold and silver returns in India. Resources Policy 68:101744
Praveena SM, Aris AZ (2021) The impacts of COVID-19 on the environmental sustainability: a perspective from the Southeast Asian region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11774-0
Quatrini S (2021) Challenges and opportunities to scale up sustainable finance after the COVID-19 crisis: lessons and promising innovations from science and practice. Ecosystem Services 48:101240
Rume T, Islam SDU (2020) Environmental effects of COVID-19 pandemic and potential strategies of sustainability. Heliyon 6(9):e04965
Salahuddin M, Habib MA, Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Marshall M, Ali MI (2020) Renewable energy and environmental quality: A second-generation panel evidence from the Sub Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. Environmental Research 191:110094
Sappor, J., Rutland, T., Rodwell, G., Yu, A., Nickels, L., & Cecil, R. (2020). COVID-19 impacts to metals prices: volatility is here to stay - part 1. Online available at: https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/research/covid-19-impacts-to-metals-prices-volatility-is-here-to-stay-part-1 (accessed on 12th July, 2020).
Selvaranjan K, Navaratnam S, Rajeev P, Ravintherakumaran N (2021) Environmental challenges induced by extensive use of face masks during COVID-19: A review and potential solutions. Environmental Challenges 3:100039
Smith DC (2020) COVID-19 and the energy and natural resources sectors: little room for error. Journal of energy resources and natural resources law 38(2):125–129
World Bank (2020) World development indicators. World Bank, Washington D.C
Worldometer (2020). COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Online available at: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ (accessed on 29th June, 2020).
Zaman K, Awan U, Islam T, Paidi R, Hassan A, bin Abdullah, A. (2016) Econometric applications for measuring the environmental impacts of biofuel production in the panel of worlds' largest region. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41(7):4305–4325
Zhu Y, Xie J, Huang F, Cao L (2020) Association between short-term exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 infection: evidence from China. Science of the total environment 727:138704
Availability of data and materials
The data is freely available at Worldometer (2020) at https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ and World Development Indicators published by World Bank (2020) at https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
Funding
Researchers supporting project number (RSP-2021/87), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MKA, conceptualization, methodology, writing—reviewing and editing. AAN, supervision, resources, software. KZ, formal analysis, methodology, resources. MMQA, resources, visualization, formal analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
All authors equally participated in the study.
Consent for publication
All authors allow the publication of the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Lotfi Aleya
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anser, .K., Nassani, A.A., Zaman, K. et al. Environmental and natural resource degradation in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic: a wake-up call. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 10456–10466 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16259-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16259-2