Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Habermasian perspective on joint meaning making online: What does it offer and what are the difficulties?

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is an exploration of the relevance of Habermas’s social theory for understanding meaning making in the context of shared online interaction. It describes some of the key ideas within Habermas’s work, noting the central importance it gives to the idea of communicative action - a special kind of discourse in which there is ‘no other force than that of the better argument’ and no other motive other than ‘the cooperative search for truth’. The paper then turns to the referencing of Habermas by educationalists in general and by supporters of online discussion in particular. It argues that a Habermasian perspective on meaning making is one in which participants strive for ‘genuine consensus’ by interrogating their own beliefs while actively engaging with opposing points of view. The value of this approach is that it introduces a concern for validity or truth into discussion of knowledge building and discriminates between emancipatory and strategic goals. While critics would argue that genuine consensus is not achievable, from Habermas we can better understand the importance of striving for such consensus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, B. (2004). Dimensions of learning and support in an online community. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 19(2), 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, R. (2006). The role of ICT in bridge building and social inclusion: Theory, policy and practice issues. European Journal of Teacher Education, 29(2), 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamber, J., & Crowther, J. (2012). Speaking Habermas to Gramsci: Implications for the vocational preparation of community educators. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(2), 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, A., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Suler, J. (2008). Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1867–1883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2004). The purposes of higher education and the changing face of academia. London Review of Education, 2(1), 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, D. (2012). Participation, deliberate learning and discourses of learning online. Language and Education, 26(2), 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beemer, J. (2006). Breaching the theoretical divide: Reassessing the ordinary and everyday in Habermas and Garfinkel. Sociological Theory, 24(1), 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonamy, J., & Haugluslaine-Charlier, B. (1995). Supporting professional learning: Beyond technological support. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 11(4), 196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boshier, R. (1990). Socio psychological factors in electronic networking. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 9(1), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, G. (1996). Emancipative educational technology. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 25, 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (2005). Learning democratic reason: The adult education project of Jürgen Habermas. The Teachers College Record, 107(6), 1127–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (2002). Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why? In S. Weisband (Ed.), Leadership at a distance: Research in technologically supported work (pp. 171–194). Oxford: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammaerts, B. (2009). Radical pluralism and free speech in online public spaces: The case of North Belgian extreme right discourses. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(6), 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical. Education, knowledge and action research. Lewes: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Webb, C. (2000). Towards a communicative model of collaborative web-mediated learning. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernela, J. (1997). The “Ideal speech moment”: Women and narrative performance in the Brazilian amazon. Feminist Studies, 23(1), 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coco, A., & Short, P. (2004). History and habit in the mobilization of ICT resources. The Information Society, 20(1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? Research in Learning Technology, 12(2), 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., et al. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derry, S., Hmelo-Silver, C., Nagarajan, A., Chernobilsky, E., & Beitzel, B. (2006). Cognitive transfer revisited: Can we exploit new media to solve old problems on a large scale? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1922/2007). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. NY: Cosimo.

  • Dunn, W. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (1998). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and Krashen’s i + 1: Incommensurable constructs; incommensurable theories. Language Learning, 48(3), 411–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englund, T. (2006). Introduction: Jürgen Habermas and education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(5), 499–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eve, J., & Brabazon, T. (2008). Learning to leisure? failure, flame, blame, shame, homophobia and other everyday practices in online education. The Journal of Literacy and Technology, 9(1), 36–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewert, G. (1991). Habermas and education: A comprehensive overview of the influence of Habermas in educational literature. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 345–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, A., Reader, T., Cornish, F., & Campbell, C. (2014). Beyond ideal speech situations: Adapting to communication asymmetries in health care. Journal of Health Psychology, 19(1), 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2004). Informal learning in an online community of practice. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C., Hermans, M., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique, 3, 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1998). The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2001). Why Europe needs a constitution. New Left Review, 11, 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2005). Equal treatment of cultures and the limits of postmodern liberalism. Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., & Dews, P. (1992). Autonomy and solidarity: Interviews with Jürgen Habermas. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S., Berente, N., & Lyytinen, K. (2009). Wikipedia, critical social theory, and the possibility of rational discourse. The Information Society, 25(1), 38–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harasim, L. (1996). Online education: The future. In T. Harrison & T. Stephen (Eds.), Computer networking and scholarly communication in the twenty-first-century university. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 3(1–2), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 117–136). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hiltz, S., & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Reading: MA Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltz, R., Coppola, N., Rotter, N., Toroff, M., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2000). Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN: A multi-measure. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2-3), 101–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, V., & Reynolds, M. (2005). Consensus, difference and ‘multiple communities’ in networked learning. Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, S. (2010) A rare interview with Jürgen Habermas, 30 April 2010, Financial Times.

  • Kent, G. (2013). Evidence of distorted communication as impetus for use of strategies to achieve ‘something like’ an ideal speech situation. The University of Wales Journal of Education, 16(1), 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T., Stahl, G., & Zemel, A. (2004). The video analyst’s manifesto: (or the implications of Garfinkel’s policies for the development of a program of video analytic research within the learning sciences). California: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, J., Sogolow, E., & Sharim, R. (2005). The role of an online community for people with a rare disease: content analysis of messages posted on a primary biliary cirrhosis mailinglist. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(1).

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Resolving social conflicts. Washington: American Pyschological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, K., & Whitelock, D. (2005). The negotiation and co-construction of meaning and understanding within a postgraduate online learning community. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(2), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1982). Of gods and demons: Habermas and practical reason. In J. Thompson & D. Held (Eds.), Habermas, critical debates (pp. 134–148). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R., & Kaye, A. (1989). Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, P. K. (2002). Negotiation of identity and power in a Japanese online discourse community. Computers and Composition, 19(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D. (1994). Managing open learning in computer supported collaborative learning environments. Studies in Higher Education, 19(3), 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D. (2000). Implementing computer supported cooperative learning. London: Kogan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamee, L., Peterson, B., & Peña, J. (2010). A call to educate, participate, invoke and indict: Understanding the communication of online hate groups. Communication Monographs, 77(2), 257–280.

  • Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morselli, F., & Boero, P. (2009). Proving as a rational behaviour: Habermas’construct of rationality as a comprehensive frame for research on the teaching and learning of proof. Lyon: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E. (2004). Recognising and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M., & Bamber, J. (2012). Introduction: From Fromm to Lacan: Habermas and education in conversation. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(2), 103–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nett, B. (2008). A community of practice among tutors enabling student participation in a seminar preparation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W., Bimber, B., & Hindman, M. (2011). The Internet and four dimensions of citizenship. In G. Edwards, L. Jacobs, & R. Shapiro (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and The Media (pp. 22–42).

  • Outhwaite, W. (2013). Bourdieu and Habermas: ‘Linguistic exchange’ versus ‘communicative action’? A reply to Simon Susen. Social Epistemology, 27(3-4), 247–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkett, R. (2003). Community technology and community building: early results from the creating community connections project. The Information Society, 19(5), 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, V. (2009). Citizens deliberating online: Theory and some evidence. In T. Davies & S. Gangadharan (Eds.), Online deliberation: Design, research, and practice (pp. 37–58). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. (2008). Using participatory media and public voice to encourage civic engagement. In W. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 97–118). Ma, USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G., Nie, M., & Edirisingha, P. (2010). Developing a five-stage model of learning in second life. Educational Research, 52(2), 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers & Education, 46(1), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B., & De Groot, R. (2007). Argumentation in a changing world. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2011). How a virtual math team structured its problem solving. Hong Kong: Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Susen, S. (2013). Bourdieusian reflections on language: Unavoidable conditions of the real speech situation. Social Epistemology, 27(3-4), 199–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, M., Fujimoto, M., & Yamasaki, N. (2003). The active lurker: influence of an in-house online community on its outside environment. Florida: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. (2005). Children online: Learning in a virtual community of practice. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wee, J. D., & Looi, C.-K. (2009). A model for analyzing math knowledge building in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 475–497). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1), 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., Boase, J., & Chen, W. (2002). The networked nature of community: Online and offline. It & Society, 1, 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukawa, J. (2006). Co-reflection in online learning: Collaborative critical thinking as narrative. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Education Studies, Westwood Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV47AL, UK

    Michael Hammond

Authors
  1. Michael Hammond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Hammond.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hammond, M. A Habermasian perspective on joint meaning making online: What does it offer and what are the difficulties?. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 10, 223–237 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9215-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9215-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation