Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of conventional radiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting foreign bodies by using cadaver feet.
Materials and methods
One hundred and sixty foreign bodies consisting of 5×2-mm fresh wood, dry wood, glass, porcelain and plastic fragments were randomly placed in the plantar soft tissue of the forefoot and sole. An additional 160 incisions were made without the insertion of foreign bodies. Radiographs, CT and MRI scans were assessed in a blinded fashion for the presence of a foreign body.
Results
Overall sensitivity and specificity for foreign body detection was 29% and 100% for radiographs, 63% and 98% for CT and 58% and 100% for MRI. The sensitivity of radiography was lower in the forefoot. CT and MRI detection rates depended on the attenuation values of the foreign bodies and on the susceptibility artefact, respectively. CT was superior to MRI in identifying waterrich fresh wood.
Conclusions
Radiography, CT and MRI are highly specific in detecting foreign bodies but sensitivity is poor. The detection rate depends on the type of foreign body for all techniques and on location for radiography. To identify foreign bodies with MRI, pulse sequences should be used to enhance the susceptibility artefact. In water-rich wood, as in chronically retained wood, CT is more accurate than MRI.
Riassunto
Obiettivo
Lo scopo di questo studio è determinare l’accuratezza della radiografia tradizionale, della tomografia computerizzata (TC) e della risonanza magnetica nucleare (RMN) nell’identificazione dei corpi estranei inseriti nei piedi di cadaveri.
Materiali e metodi
Nei tessuti molli plantari dell’avampiede e del meso-retropiede sono stati posizionati, in maniera casuale, centosessanta corpi estranei di legno fresco, legno secco, vetro, porcellana e plastica dalle dimensioni di 5×2 mm. Sono state inoltre praticate centosessanta incisioni senza inserire alcun corpo estraneo. Le radiografie, TC e RMN alla ricerca dei corpi estranei sono state interpretate in cieco.
Risultati
La sensibilità e la specificità complessive sono risultate rispettivamente del 29% e 100% usando le radiografie, del 63% e 98% usando la TC e del 58% e 100% usando la RMN. La sensibilità della radiologia tradizionale è risultata minore nell’avampiede. Le percentuali di identificazione di TC e RMN sono dipese rispettivamente dai valori di attenuazione dei corpi estranei e dagli artefatti da suscettibilità. La TC si è rivelata migliore rispetto alla RMN nell’individuazione del legno fresco, ricco di acqua.
Conclusioni
Radiologia tradizionale, TC e RMN sono altamente specifiche nella rilevazione dei corpi estranei ma presentano una bassa sensibilità. Le percentuali di identificazione dipendono, per tutte le metodiche, dal tipo di corpo estraneo e, per quanto riguarda la radiologia tradizionale, anche dalla posizione. In RMN andrebbero usate sequenze pulsate per esaltare gli artefatti da suscettibilità dei corpi estranei. La TC è superiore alla RMN nel legno fresco ricco di acqua e in quello ritenuto a lungo nei tessuti.
Similar content being viewed by others
References/Bibliografia
Cracchiolo A, 3rd (1980) Wooden foreign bodies in the foot. Am J Surg 140:585–587
Monu JU, McManus CM, Ward WG et al (1995) Soft-tissue masses caused by long-standing foreign bodies in the extremities: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:395–397
Peterson JJ, Bancroft LW, Kransdorf MJ (2002) Wooden foreign bodies: imaging appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:557–562
Bergquist ER, Wu JS, Goldsmith JD et al (2010) Orthopaedic case of the month: ankle pain and swelling in a 23-year-old man. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2556–2560
Bode KS, Haggerty CJ, Krause J (2007) Latent foreign body synovitis. J Foot Ankle Surg 46:291–296
Callegari L, Leonardi A, Bini A et al (2009) Ultrasound-guided removal of foreign bodies: personal experience. Eur Radiol 19:1273–1279
Rockett MS, Gentile SC, Gudas CJ et al (1995) The use of ultrasonography for the detection of retained wooden foreign bodies in the foot. J Foot Ankle Surg 34:478–484; Discussion 510–471
Bauer AR Jr, Yutani D (1983) Computed tomographic localization of wooden foreign bodies in children’s extremities. Arch Surg 118:1084–1086
Gulati D, Agarwal A (2010) Wooden foreign body in the forearm-presentation after eight years. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 16:373–375
Said HG, Masoud MA, Yousef HA et al (2011) Multidetector CT for thorn (wooden) foreign bodies of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:823–825
Mizel MS, Steinmetz ND, Trepman E (1994) Detection of wooden foreign bodies in muscle tissue: experimental comparison of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography. Foot Ankle Int 15:437–443
Oikarinen KS, Nieminen TM, Makarainen H et al (1993) Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. An in vitro study. Int J Oral Max Surg 22:119–124
Turkcuer I, Atilla R, Topacoglu H et al (2006) Do we really need plain and soft-tissue radiographies to detect radiolucent foreign bodies in the ED? Am J Emerg Med 24:763–768
Russell RC, Williamson DA, Sullivan JW et al (1991) Detection of foreign bodies in the hand. J Hand Surg 16:2–11
Racz RS, Ramanujam CL, Zgonis T (2010) Puncture wounds of the foot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 27:523–534
Humzah D, Moss AL (1994) Delayed digital nerve transection as a result of a retained foreign body. J Acc Emerg Med 11:261–262
Yanay O, Vaughan DJ, Diab M et al (2001) Retained wooden foreign body in a child’s thigh complicated by severe necrotizing fasciitis: a case report and discussion of imaging modalities for early diagnosis. Pediatr Emerg Care 17:354–355
Anderson MA, Newmeyer WL, 3rd, Kilgore ES Jr (1982) Diagnosis and treatment of retained foreign bodies in the hand. Am J Surg 144:63–67
Bouajina E, Harzallah L, Ghannouchi M et al (2006) Foreign body granuloma due to unsuspected wooden splinter. Joint Bone Spine 73:329–331
Laor T, Barnewolt CE (1999) Nonradiopaque penetrating foreign body: “a sticky situation”. Pediatr Radiol 29:702–704
Gaughen JR, Jr., Keats TE (2006) Soft tissue calcifications in the lower extremities of severely diabetic patients simulating venous stasis or collagen vascular disease. Emerg Radiol 13:135–138
Bushong S (2003) Magnetic resonance artifact. In: Bushong S (ed) Magnetic resonance imaging: physical and biological principles. Mosby, Missouri, pp 374–392
Sidharthan S, Mbako AN (2010) Pitfalls in diagnosis and problems in extraction of retained wooden foreign bodies in the foot. Foot Ankle Surg 16:e18–e20
Ablett M, Kusumawidjaja D (2009) Appearance of wooden foreign body on CT scan. Emerg Med J 26:680
Pelc JS, Beaulieu CF (2001) Volume rendering of tendon-bone relationships using unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:973–977
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pattamapaspong, N., Srisuwan, T., Sivasomboon, C. et al. Accuracy of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing foreign bodies in the foot. Radiol med 118, 303–310 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-012-0844-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-012-0844-4