Skip to main content
Log in

MR colonography with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema for the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the usefulness of MR colonography (MRC) with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Materials and methods

Twenty-two patients with suspected or known IBD underwent MRC with a 1.5-T MR system (Siemens Symphony) using a phased-array coil. A fecal tagging technique was performed by oral administration of dense barium sulfate (200 ml) at major meals starting 2 days before the MRI. After a water enema (2000–2500 ml), the MR protocol was carried out, starting with HASTE and true-FISP sequences. Coronal T1w 3D VIBE (2.0 mm thick) was obtained before and 60 s after intravenous administration of Gd chelate. MR images were evaluated by consensus agreement of two observers in terms of image quality and by searching for bowel abnormalities. MRC findings were correlated with our gold standard—conventional colonoscopy (incomplete in 6/22 patients) with histopathological analysis, and surgery (performed in 8/22 subjects).

Results

The MR imaging protocol was completed in all of the investigated subjects. In terms of image quality, 128 out of 132 colon segments (97 %) were considered diagnostic on MR examinations by the two reviewers; signs of bowel inflammation were identified in 74 and 72 % of colon segments of patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 6) and Crohn’s disease (n = 15), respectively. In 13/15 patients with Crohn’s disease, involvement of both the large and small bowel was demonstrated on MR imaging; perianal abscesses and fistulas were also identified in 2 and 3 of these patients, respectively. In one patient with normal MRC, a diagnosis of IBD could not be confirmed.

Conclusion

MRC with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema is a promising minimally invasive technique for evaluating the bowel in patients with a suspected or established diagnosis of IBD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menees S, Higgins P, Korsnes S, Elta G. Does colonoscopy cause increased ulcerative colitis symptoms? Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13:12–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rimola J, Rodríguez S, García-Bosch O, Ricart E, Pagès M, Pellisé M, et al. Role of 3.0-T MR colonography in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease. Radiographics. 2009;29:701–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bechtold ML, Choudhary A. Bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy: a continual search for excellence. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:155–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Koido S, Ohkusa T, Nakae K, Yokoyama T, Shibuya T, Sakamoto N, et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy at a Japanese academic hospital. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:6961–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Achiam MP, Løgager VB, Chabanova E, Eegholm B, Thomsen HS, Rosenberg J. Diagnostic accuracy of MR colonography with fecal tagging. Abdom Imaging. 2009;34:483–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Achiam MP, Chabanova E, Løgager VB, Andersen LP, Thomsen HS, Rosenberg J. MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:576–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodriguez Gomez S, Pagés Llinas M, Castells Garangou A, De Juan Garcia C, Bordas Alsina JM, Rimola Gibert J, et al. Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1396–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lauenstein T, Holtmann G, Schoenfelder D, Bosk S, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF. MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:823–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuehle CA, Langhorst J, Ladd SC, Zoepf T, Nuefer M, Grabellus F, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population. Gut. 2007;56:1079–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ergen FB, Akata D, Hayran M, Harmanci O, Arslan S, Basaran C, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography for the evaluation of colonic inflammatory bowel disease: correlation with conventional colonoscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008;32:848–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Florie J, Jensch S, Nievelstein RA, Bartelsman JF, Baak LC, van Gelder RE, et al. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Radiology. 2007;243:122–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartmann D, Bassler B, Schilling D, Adamek HE, Jakobs R, Pfeifer B, et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR-colonography versus conventional colonoscopy. Radiology. 2006;238:143–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zijta FM, Bipat S, Stoker J. Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:1031–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, Holtmann G, Debatin JF. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2002;223:248–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goehde SC, Descher E, Boekstegers A, Lauenstein T, Kühle C, Ruehm SG, et al. Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:576–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ajaj WM, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, Gerken G, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity. Gut. 2005;54:257–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R, Völk M, Schölmerich J, Feuerbach S, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut. 2005;54:250–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Langhorst J, Kühle CA, Ajaj W, Nüfer M, Barkhausen J, Michalsen A, et al. MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of inflammatory bowel diseases: diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13:1001–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Roberto Gigoni, MD and Simonetta Salemi, MD for their valuable contributions to the optimization of the MRI protocol and the evaluation of MR examinations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piero Boraschi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boraschi, P., Donati, F. MR colonography with a fecal tagging technique and water-based enema for the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease. Jpn J Radiol 34, 585–594 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-016-0552-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-016-0552-4

Keywords

Navigation