ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
Poor communication of tests whose results are pending at hospital discharge can lead to medical errors.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the adequacy with which hospital discharge summaries document tests with pending results and the appropriate follow-up providers.
DESIGN
Retrospective study of a randomly selected sample
PATIENTS
Six hundred ninety-six patients discharged from two large academic medical centers, who had test results identified as pending at discharge through queries of electronic medical records.
INTERVENTION AND MEASUREMENTS
Each patient’s discharge summary was reviewed to identify whether information about pending tests and follow-up providers was mentioned. Factors associated with documentation were explored using clustered multivariable regression models.
MAIN RESULTS
Discharge summaries were available for 99.2% of 668 patients whose data were analyzed. These summaries mentioned only 16% of tests with pending results (482 of 2,927). Even though all study patients had tests with pending results, only 25% of discharge summaries mentioned any pending tests, with 13% documenting all pending tests. The documentation rate for pending tests was not associated with level of experience of the provider preparing the summary, patient’s age or race, length of hospitalization, or duration it took for results to return. Follow-up providers’ information was documented in 67% of summaries.
CONCLUSION
Discharge summaries are grossly inadequate at documenting both tests with pending results and the appropriate follow-up providers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(2):121–8.
Solet DJ, Norvell JM, Rutan GH, Frankel RM. Lost in translation: challenges and opportunities in physician-to-physician communication during patient handoffs. Acad Med. 2005;80(12):1094–9.
Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):161–7.
Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Hamilton JD. Quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aust. 1996;164(12):754.
Kosecoff J, Kahn KL, Rogers WH, et al. Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The ‘quicker-and-sicker’ story revisited. JAMA. 1990;264(15):1980–3.
McMahon LF Jr. The hospitalist movement-time to move on. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(25):2627–9.
van Walraven C, Seth R, Austin PC, Laupacis A. Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmission. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(3):186–92.
IM.6.10. S. Hospital Accreditation Standards: Joint Commission Resources. Oakbrook Terrace, IL; 2006.
Halasyamani L, Kripalani S, Coleman E, et al. Transition of care for hospitalized elderly patients-development of a discharge checklist for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2006;1(6):354–60.
Wilson S, Ruscoe W, Chapman M, Miller R. General practitioner-hospital communications: a review of discharge summaries. J Qual Clin Pract. 2001;21(4):104–8.
Foster DS, Paterson C, Fairfield G. Evaluation of immediate discharge documents-room for improvement? Scott Med J. 2002;47(4):77–9.
Moore C, Wisnivesky J, Williams S, McGinn T. Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(8):646–51.
McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Barnes M, et al. The Indiana network for patient care: a working local health information infrastructure. An example of a working infrastructure collaboration that links data from five health systems and hundreds of millions of entries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1214–20.
Acknowledgements
This work was performed at Regenstrief Institute and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, and was supported by grant LM07117-11 from NLM and KL2RR025760-01 from NCRR. The authors appreciate the support of Drs. Marc Overhage, William M. Tierney and IUSM EIP-REACH.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Were, M.C., Li, X., Kesterson, J. et al. Adequacy of Hospital Discharge Summaries in Documenting Tests with Pending Results and Outpatient Follow-up Providers. J GEN INTERN MED 24, 1002–1006 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1057-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1057-y