Abstract
This study developed a procedure to determine the quality priorities of the internet protocol television (IPTV) service. First, a set of key elements of IPTV service quality was developed based on a literature review and a focus group interview. Second, analytic hierarchy process and the Kano model were applied to identify the requirements of experts and customers, respectively. The experts measured the importance and difficulty of management, whereas the customers measured the satisfaction level and importance of each quality element. Third, quality priorities were calculated through the entropy principle and scenario-based analysis. The proposed procedure is illustrated with a case study of a telecommunications company in Korea.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bayraktaroglu G, Özgen Ö (2008) Integrating the Kano model, AHP and planning matrix: QFD application in library services. Libr Manag 29(4/5):327–351
Berger C, Blauth R, Boger D, Bolster C, Burchill G, DuMouchel W, Richter R, Rubinoff A, Shen D, Timko M, Walden D (1993) Kano’s method for understanding customer-defined quality. Cent Qual Manag J 2(4):3–36
Bruzgiene R, Narbutaite L, Adomkus T, Cibulskis R (2013) Subjective and objective MOS evaluation of user’s perceived quality assessment for IPTV service: a study of the experimental investigations. Electron Electr Eng 19(7):110–113
Carman JM (1990) Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. J Retail 66(1):33–55
Chatterjee S, Chatterjee A (2005) Prioritization of service quality parameters based on ordinal responses. Total Qual Manag 16(4):477–489
Choi K, Lee D, Olson DL (2015) Service quality and productivity in the U.S. airline industry: a service quality-adjusted DEA model. Serv Bus 9(1):137–160
Chowdhary N, Prakash M (2007) Prioritizing service quality dimensions. Manag Serv Qual: Int J 17(5):493–509
Cronin JJ, Taylor SA (1992) Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. J Mark 56(3):55–68
Fitzgerald L, Johnston R, Brignall S, Silvestro R, Voss C (1991) Performance measurement in service businesses. Chartered institute of management accountants
Garibay C, Gutiérrez H, Figueroa A (2010) Evaluation of a digital library by means of quality function deployment (QFD) and the Kano model. J Acad Libr 36(2):125–132
Gummesson E (1998) Productivity, quality and relationship marketing in service operations. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 10(1):4–15
Jan PT, Lu HP, Chou TC (2012) Measuring the perception discrepancy of the service quality between provider and customers in the internet protocol television industry. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 23(7–8):981–995
Jang HY, Noh MJ (2011) Customer acceptance of IPTV service quality. Int J Info Manag 31(6):582–592
Jiang JJ, Klein G, Carr CL (2002) Measuring information system service quality: SERVQUAL from the other side. MIS Q 26(2):145–166
Johnston R, Silvestro R (1990) The determinants of service quality-a customer-based approach. In: The proceedings of the decision science institute conference
Jung YC (2013) Broadcasting market overview and forecast 2014. Korean information society development institute premium Report: 1–24
Kang H, Kang M, Yoon S, Kim D (2014a) A consumer value analysis of mobile internet protocol television based on a means-end chain theory. Serv Bus 8(4):587–613
Kang SU, Park S, Lee (2014b) Factors influencing new media subscription based on multigroup analysis of IPTV and DCTV. ETRI J 36(6):1041–1050
Kano N, Seraku N, Takahashi F (1984) Attractive quality and must-be quality. J Jpn Society Qual Control 14(2):39–48
Kim HJ, Choi SG (2014) QoE assessment model for multimedia streaming services using QoS parameters. Multimed Tool Appl 72(3):2163–2175
Kim KJ, Shin WS, Min DK, Kim HJ, Yoo JS, Lim HM, Lee SH, Jeong YK (2008) Analysis of key features in IPTV service quality model. In industrial engineering and engineering management 2008 IEEE international conference: 595–598
Lam SS (1997) SERVQUAL: a tool for measuring patients’ opinions of hospital service quality in Hong Kong. Total Qual Manag 8(4):145–152
Lee HJ, Kim SI, Nam SJ, Kim YK (2014) Broadcasting and communication market forecast 2014. KT economics and management research lab Report: 1–9
Lewis BR (1993) Service quality measurement. Mark Intell Plan 11(4):4–12
Li Y, Tang J, Luo X, Xu J (2009) An integrated method of rough set, Kano’s model and AHP for rating customer requirements’ final importance. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):7045–7053
Lloret J, Garcia M, Atenas M, Canovas A (2011) A QoE management system to improve the IPTV network. Int J Commun Syst 24(1):118–138
Matzler K, Hinterhuber HH (1998) How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation 18(1):25–38
Ostrowski PL, O’Brien TV, Gordon GL (1993) Service quality and customer loyalty in the commercial airline industry. J Travel Res 32(2):16–24
Parasuraman A (2002) Service quality and productivity: a synergistic perspective. Manag Serv Qual Int J 12(1):6–9
Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J Mark 49(4):41–50
Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) Servqual: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail 64(1):12–40
Rosen LD, Karwan KR (1994) Prioritizing the dimensions of service quality: an empirical investigation and strategic assessment. Int J Serv Ind Manag 5(4):39–52
Rust RT, Moorman C, Dickson PR (2002) Getting return on quality: revenue expansion, cost reduction, or both? J Mark 66(4):7–24
Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytical hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26
Sawng Y, Motohashi K, Kim GH (2013) Comparative analysis of innovative diffusion in the high-tech markets of Japan and South Korea: a use–diffusion model approach. Serv Bus 7(1):143–166
Seth N, Deshmukh SG, Vrat P (2005) Service quality models: a review. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 22(9):913–949
Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) Mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Illinois
Shen XX, Tan KC, Xie M (2000) An integrated approach to innovative product development using Kano’s model and QFD. Eur J Innov Manag 3(2):91–99
Shin DH (2009) An empirical investigation of a modified technology acceptance model of IPTV. Behav Inf Technol 28(4):361–372
Song J, Jang T, Sohn S (2009) Conjoint analysis for IPTV service. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):7860–7864
Staelens N, Moens S, Van den Broeck W, Marien I, Vermeulen B, Lambert P, Demeester P (2010) Assessing quality of experience of IPTV and video on demand services in real-life environments. IEEE Trans Broadcast 56(4):458–466
Tan KC, Pawitra TA (2001) Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano’s model into QFD for service excellence development. Manag Serv Qual 11(6):418–430
Thompson P, DeSouza G, Gale BT (1985) Strategic management of service quality. Qual Prog 19(6):20–25
Wang CH, Wang J (2014) Combining fuzzy AHP and fuzzy Kano to optimize product varieties for smart cameras: a zero-one integer programming perspective. Appl Soft Comp 22:410–416
Watanabe K, Yamagishi K, Okamoto J, Takahashi A (2008) Proposal of new QoE assessment approach for quality management of IPTV services. In image processing, 2008. ICIP 2008. 15th IEEE international conference: 2060–2063
Yamagishi K, Okamoto J, Hayashi T, Takahashi A (2012) No reference video-quality-assessment model for monitoring video quality of IPTV services. IEICE Trans Commun 95(2):435–448
Yang CC (2003) Establishment and applications of the integrated model of service quality measurement. Manag Serv Qual 13(4):310–324
Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A (1988) Communication and control processes in the delivery of service quality. J Mark 52(2):35–48
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shin, W.S., Lee, HK., Kim, KJ. et al. Developing a quality prioritization procedure for IPTV service. Serv Bus 11, 427–449 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-016-0309-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-016-0309-2