Abstract
Summary
This qualitative study explored beliefs and attitudes regarding osteoporosis and its management. General medical practitioners (GPs) were ambivalent about osteoporosis due to concern about financial barriers for patients and their own beliefs about the salience of osteoporosis. GPs considered investigation and treatment in the context of patients' whole lives.
Purpose
We aimed to investigate barriers, enablers, and other factors influencing the investigation and management of osteoporosis using a qualitative approach. This paper analyses data from discussions with general medical practitioners (GPs) about their beliefs and attitudes regarding osteoporosis and its management.
Methods
Fourteen GPs and two practice nurses aged 27–89 years participated in four focus groups, from June 2010 to March 2011. Each group comprised 3–5 participants, and discussions were semi-structured, according to the protocol developed for the main study. Discussion points ranged from the circumstances under which GPs would initiate investigation for osteoporosis and their subsequent actions to their views about treatment efficacy and patient adherence to prescribed treatment. Audio recordings were transcribed and coded for analysis using analytic comparison to identify the major themes.
Results
The GPs were not particularly concerned about osteoporosis in their patients or the general population, ranking diabetes, osteoarthritis, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension higher than concern about osteoporosis. They expressed confidence in the efficacy of anti-fracture medications but were concerned about the potential financial burden on patients with limited incomes. The GPs were unsure about guidelines for investigation and management of osteoporosis in men and the appropriate duration of treatment, particularly for the bisphosphonates in all patients.
Conclusions
The GPs' ambivalence about osteoporosis appeared to stem from structural factors such as financial barriers for patients and their own beliefs about the salience of osteoporosis. GPs considered the impact of investigating and prescribing treatment in the context of patients' whole lives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1726–1733
Alonso-Coello P, Lopez A, Pencille LJ (2009) Is too much intervention recommended in the ACP osteoporosis treatment guidelines? Letter to the editor. Ann Intern Med 150:285–286
Lock CA, Lecouturier J, Mason JM, Dickinson HO (2005) Lifestyle interventions to prevent osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 17:20–28
Sanders KM, Nicholson GC, Watts JJ, Pasco JA, Henry MJ, Kotowicz MA, Seeman E (2006) Half the burden of fragility fractures in the community occur in women without osteoporosis. When is fracture prevention cost-effective? Bone 38:694–700
Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Dolovich L, Lau E, Adachi JD (2007) Patient adherence to osteoporosis medications: problems, consequences and management strategies. Drugs Aging 24:37–55
Chiang A, Jones J, Humphreys J, Martin C (2006) Osteoporosis: diagnosis and treatment in a general practice population. Aust Fam Physician 35:166–168
Inderjeeth CA, Glennon D, Petta A (2006) Study of osteoporosis awareness, investigation and treatment of patients discharged from a tertiary public teaching hospital. Intern Med J 36:547–551
Richardson JC, Hassell AB, Thomas E, Hay EM (2004) GPs' perceptions of the role of DEXA scanning: an exploratory study. Fam Pract 21:51–53
Rizzoli R, Brandi ML, Dreinhofer K, Thomas T, Wahl DA, Cooper C (2010) The gaps between patient and physician understanding of the emotional and physical impact of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos 5:145–153
Reventlow S, Bang H (2006) Brittle bones: ageing or threat of disease—exploring women's cultural models of osteoporosis. Scand J Public Health 34:320–326
Reventlow S, Overgaard I, Hvas L, Malterud K (2008) Metaphorical mediation in women's perceptions of risk related to osteoporosis: a qualitative interview study. Health Risk Soc 10:103–115
Skolbekken J-A, Østerlie W, Forsmo S (2008) Brittle bones, pain and fractures—lay constructions of osteoporosis among Norwegian women attending the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT). Soc Sci Med 66:2562–2572
Kanis J, Brazier JE, Stevenson M, Calvert NW, Lloyd Jones M (2002) Treatment of established osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis. Health Technol Assess 6:1–146
Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C, Delmas PD, Reginster J-Y, Borgstrom F, Rizzoli R (2008) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 19:399–428
Werner P (2005) Knowledge about osteoporosis: assessment, correlates and outcomes. Osteoporos Int 16:115–127
Edwards L, Fraser M (1997) How do we increase awareness of osteoporosis? Balliere Clin Rheumatol 11:631–644
Werner P, Vered I (2002) The diagnosis of osteoporosis: attitudes and knowledge of Israeli physicians. Aging Clin Exp Res 14:52–59
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2007) Census of Population and Housing 2006. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
Kitzinger J (2006) Focus groups. In: Pope C, Mays N (eds) Qualitative research in health care, 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK
Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ (2007) Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res 42:1758–1772
World Medical Association (2008) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. In, 59th General Assembly, Seoul, Korea edn.
Neuman WL (2003) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative methods. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, USA
Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago, USA
Boeije H (2002) A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant 26:391–409
Silverman D, Marvasti A (2008) Doing qualitative research: a comprehensive guide. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
O'Neill S, MacLennan A, Bass S et al (2004) Clinical practice: guidelines for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis for GPs. Aust Fam Physician 33:910–917
Sturtridge W, Lentle B, Hanley DA (1996) Prevention and management of osteoporosis: Consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2. The use of bone density measurement in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. Can Med Assoc J 155:924–929
Henry MJ, Pasco JA, Nicholson GC, Pocock NA, Kotowicz MA (2004) Reference ranges for bone densitometers adopted Australia-wide: Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Australas Radiol 48:473–475
Henry MJ, Pasco JA, Korn S, Gibson JE, Kotowicz MA, Nicholson GC (2010) Bone mineral density reference ranges for Australian men: Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 21:909–917
The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners R (2010) Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and older men. In. RACGP, South Melbourne, Vic., Australia
Skolbekken JA (1995) The risk epidemic in medical journals. Soc Sci Med 40:291–305
Antonacci MD, Hanson DS, Heggeness MH (1996) Pitfalls in the measurement of bone mineral density by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Spine 21:87–91
Walker-Bone K, Reid D, Cooper C (1998) Is screening for osteoporosis worthwhile? Br Med Bull 54:915–927
Hruschka DJ, Hadley C (2008) A glossary of culture in epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health 62:947–951
Gourlay M (2009) Osteoporosis screening: mixed messages in primary care. Am Fam Physician 79:189–190
Hiligsmann M, Gathon HJ, Bruyère O, Ethgen O, Rabenda V, Reginster JY (2010) Cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening followed by treatment: the impact of medication adherence. Value in Health: The Journal of The International Society For Pharmacoeconomics And Outcomes Research 13:394–401
Gourlay ML, Fine JP, Preisser JS, May RC, Li C, Lui L-Y, Ransohoff DF, Cauley JA, Ensrud KE (2012) Bone-density testing interval and transition to osteoporosis in older women. N Engl J Med 366:225–233
Petursson H, Getz L, Sigurdsson JA, Heltlevik I (2009) Current European guidelines for management of arterial hypertension: Are they adequate for use in primary care? Modelling study based on the Norwegian HUNT 2 population. BMC Family Practice 10:
Sambrook PN, Chen JS, Simpson JM, March LM (2010) Impact of adverse news media on prescriptions for osteoporosis: effect on fractures and mortality. Med J Aust 193:154–156
Bolland MJ, Barber PA, Doughty RN, Mason B, Horne A, Ames R, Gamble GD, Grey A, Reid IR (2008) Vascular events in healthy older women receiving calcium supplementation: randomized controlled trial. Br Med J 336:262–266
Sanders KM, Stuart AL, Williamson EJ, Simpson JA, Kotowicz MA, Young D, Nicholson GC (2010) Annual high-dose oral vitamin D for falls and fractures in elderly women: a randomised controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 303:1815–1822
Reginster J-Y (2011) Antifracture efficacy of currently available therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Drugs 71:65–78
Schwarz P, Jorgensen NR, Mosekilde L, Vestergaard P (2011) The evidence for efficacy of osteoporosis treatment in men with primary osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of antiresorptive and anabolic treatment in men. J Osteoporos 2011:259818
Ringe JD, Doherty JG (2010) Absolute risk reduction in osteoporosis: assessing treatment efficacy by number needed to treat. Rheumatol Int 30:863–869
Åstrand J, Thorngren K-G, Tägil M, Åkesson K (2008) 3-year follow-up of 215 fracture patients from a prospective and consecutive osteoporosis screening program. Fracture patients care! Acta Orthop 79:404–409
Nielen MM, Assendelft WJ, Drenthen AJM, van den Hombergh P, van Dis I, Schellevis FG (2010) Primary prevention of cardio-metabolic diseases in general practice: a Dutch survey of attitudes and working methods of general practitioners. Eur J Gen Pract 16:139–142
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Otmar, R., Reventlow, S.D., Nicholson, G.C. et al. General medical practitioners' knowledge and beliefs about osteoporosis and its investigation and management. Arch Osteoporos 7, 107–114 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-012-0088-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-012-0088-x