Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the Hot Deformation Behavior of a Super-Austenitic Steel Through Microstructural and Neural Network Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of hot compression tests were conducted in the temperature range of 800-1100 °C under the strain rates of 0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 s−1 to assess the flow behavior and microstructure evolution of a super-austenitic stainless steel. The occurrence of dynamic recrystallization has been characterized as the dominant restoration mechanism operating in the investigated range of temperature. This is considered as the main factor affecting the related flow characteristics of the material. To better analyzing the obtained results, an artificial neural network (ANN) model with single hidden layer composed of 20 neurons has been established to simulate the flow behavior of the material. To train the model, a feed-forward back propagation algorithm has been employed. The reliability of the proposed model has been evaluated using standard statistical indices. In addition, the capability of the model has been assessed under the conditions at which the related data were not incorporated in the model. It was found that the developed ANN model employing this algorithm could efficiently track the work hardening and dynamic softening regions of the deforming material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Jones and V. Randle, Sensitisation Behaviour of Grain Boundary Engineered Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, 527, p 4275–4280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Imandoust, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, and H.R. Abedi, Low-Temperature Strain-Induced Ferrite Transformation in Twinning-Induced Plasticity Steel, Scr. Mater., 2012, 67, p 995–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Özyürek, An Effect of Weld Current and Weld Atmosphere on the Resistance Spot Weldability of 304L Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Des., 2008, 29, p 597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Guo, H. Ji, X. Liu, L. Gao, R. Dong, M. Jin, and Q. Zhang, Research on Flow Stress During Hot Deformation Process and Processing Map for 316LN Austenitic Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2012, 21, p 1455–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Imandoust, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, S. Heshmati-Manesh, S. Moemeni, and P. Changizian, Effects of Ferrite Volume Fraction on the Tensile Deformation Characteristics of Dual Phase Twinning Induced Plasticity Steel, Mater. Des., 2014, 53, p 99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Zambon, P. Ferro, and F. Bonollo, Compositional and Residual Stress Evaluation of CO2 Laser Welded Superaustenitic AISI, 904L Stainless Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, 424, p 117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Imandoust, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, M. Sabet, and H.R. Abedi, An Analysis of the Deformation Characteristics of a Dual Phase Twinning-Induced Plasticity Steel in Warm Working Temperature Regime, Mater. Des., 2012, 40, p 556–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O. Sabokpa, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, H.R. Abedi, and N. Haghdadi, Artificial Neural Network Modeling to Predict the High Temperature Flow Behavior of an AZ81 Magnesium Alloy, Mater. Des., 2012, 39, p 390–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Mandal, P.V. Sivaprasad, S. Venugopal, K.P.N. Murthy, and B. Raj, Artificial neural Network Modeling of Composition-Process-Property Correlations in Austenitic Stainless Steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 485, p 571–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Mirzaei, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, N. Haghdadi, and A. Marandi, Constitutive Description of hIGh Temperature Flow Behavior of Sanicro-28 Super-Austenitic Stainless Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, 589, p 76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Jia, F. Li, Q. Li, H. Li, and Z. Li, A Comparative Study on Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Model and Artificial Neural Network Model to Predict High-Temperature Deformation Behaviour in Aermet100 Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528, p 4774–4782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Liang and A.S. Khan, A Critical Review of Experimental Results and Constitutive Models for BCC and FCC Metals over a Wide Range of Strain Rates and Temperatures, Int. J. Plast, 1999, 15, p 963–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Mandal, M. Jayalakshmi, A.K. Bhaduri, and V.S. Sarma, Effect of Strain Rate on the Dynamic Recrystallization Behavior in a Nitrogen-Enhanced 316L (N), Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2014, 45, p 5645–5656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Mandal, A.K. Bhaduri, and V.S. Sarma, Role of Twinning on Dynamic Recrystallization and Microstructure During Moderate to High Strain Rate Hot Deformation of a Ti-Modified Austenitic Stainless Steel, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2012, 43, p 2056–2068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Poelt, C. Sommitsch, S. Mitsche, and M. Walter, Dynamic Recrystallization of Ni-Base Alloys—Experimental Results and Comparisons with Simulations, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, 420, p 306–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y.C. Lin, J. Zhang, and J. Zhong, Application of Neural Networks to Predict the Elevated Temperature Flow Behavior of a Low Alloy Steel, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2008, 43, p 752–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y.C. Lin and X.M. Chen, A Critical Review of Experimental Results and Constitutive Descriptions for Metals and Alloys in Hot Working, Mater. Des., 2011, 32, p 1733–1759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W.D. Sun, Y.Q. Zeng, Y.L. Zhao, X. Qi, and Y.F. Ma, Han, Development of Constitutive Relationship Model of Ti600 Alloy Using Artificial Neural Network, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2010, 48, p 686–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Sarkar and J.K. Chakravartty, Prediction of Flow Stress in Cadmium Using Constitutive Equation and Artificial Neural Network Approach, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2013, 22, p 2982–2989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Sun, W.D. Zeng, Y.Q. Zhao, X.M. Zhang, Y. Shu, and Y.G. Zhou, Modeling Constitutive Relationship of Ti40 Alloy Using Artificial Neural Network, Mater. Des., 2011, 32, p 1537–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. N.S. Reddy, Y.H. Lee, C.H. Park, and C.S. Lee, Prediction of Flow Stress in Ti-6Al-4 V Alloy with an Equiaxed α+β Microstructure by Artificial Neural Networks, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 492, p 276–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H.Y. Li, D.D. Wei, Y.H. Li, and X.F. Wang, Application of Artificial Neural Network and Constitutive Equations to Describe the Hot Compressive Behavior of 28CrMnMoV Steel, Mater. Des., 2012, 35, p 557–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Mandal, P.V. Sivaprasad, S. Venugopal, and K.P.N. Murthy, Constitutive Flow Behaviour of Austenitic Stainless Steels Under Hot Deformation: Artificial Neural Network Modelling to Understand, Evaluate and Predict, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci., 2006, 14, p 1053–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Mandal, P.V. Sivaprasad, and S. Venugopal, Capability of a Feed-Forward Artificial Neural Network to Predict the Constitutive Flow Behavior of As Cast 304 Stainless Steel Under Hot Deformation, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 2006, 129, p 242–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. I.S. Jalham, Modeling Capability of the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to Predict the Effect of the Hot Deformation Parameters on the Strength of Al-Base Metal Matrix Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2003, 63, p 63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. ASTM E209, Standard Practice for Compression Tests of Metallic Materials at Elevated Temperatures With Conventional or Rapid Heating Rates and Strain Rates, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, PA, 2010.

  27. M.E. Wahabia, L. Gavard, J.M. Cabrera, J.M. Prado, and F. Montheillet, EBSD Study of Purity Effects During Hot Working in Austenitic Stainless Steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, 393, p 83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. F.J. Humphreys and M. Hatherly, Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena, 2nd ed., Pergamon, Oxford, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Mandal, S.K. Mishra, A. Kumar, I. Samajdar, P.V. Sivaprasad, T. Jayakumar, and B. Raj, Evolution and Characterization of Dynamically Recrystallized Microstructure in a Titanium-Modified Austenitic Stainless Steel Using Ultrasonic and EBSD Techniques, Philos. Mag., 2008, 88, p 883–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Dehghan-Manshadi, M.R. Barnett, and P.D. Hodgson, Recrystallization in AISI, 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel During and After Hot Deformation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 485, p 664–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. C. Zener and H. Hollomon, Effect of Strain Rate Upon Plastic Flow of Steel, J. Appl. Phys., 1944, 15, p 22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. P. Changizian, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, and H.R. Abedi, On the Recrystallization Behavior of Homogenized AZ81 Magnesium Alloy: The Effect of Mechanical Twins and γ Precipitates, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 558, p 44–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. G.Z. Quan, W.Q. Lv, Y.P. Mao, Y.W. Zhang, and J. Zhou, Prediction of Flow Stress in a Wide Temperature Range Involving Phase Transformation for As-Cast Ti-6Al-2Zr-1Mo-1 V Alloy by Artificial Neural Network, Mater. Des., 2013, 50, p 51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. N. Haghdadi, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, A.R. Khalesian, and H.R. Abedi, Artificial Neural Network Modeling to Predict the Hot Deformation Behavior of an A356 Aluminum Alloy, Mater. Des., 2013, 49, p 386–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. A. Jenab, A.K. Taheri, and K. Jenab, The Use of ANN to Predict the Hot Deformation Behavior of AA7075 at Low Strain Rates, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2013, 22, p 903–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. S. Mandal, P.V. Sivaprasad, S. Venugopal, and K.P.N. Murthy, Artificial Neural Network Modeling to Evaluate and Predict the Deformation Behavior of Stainless Steel Type AISI, 304L During Hot Torsion, Appl. Soft Comput., 2009, 9, p 237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J. Liu, H. Chang, T.Y. Hsu, and X. Ruan, Prediction of the Flow Stress of High-Speed Steel During Hot Deformation Using a BP Artificial Neural Network, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2000, 103, p 200–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. X. Ma, W. Zeng, F. Tian, Y. Sun, and Y. Zhou, Modeling Constitutive Relationship of BT25 Titanium Alloy During Hot Deformation by Artificial Neural Network, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2012, 21, p 1591–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. M.P. Phaniraj and A.K. Lahiri, The Applicability of Neural Network Model to Predict Flow Stress for Carbon Steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2003, 141, p 219–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. S. Srinivasulu and A. Jain, A Comparative Analysis of Training Methods for Artificial Neural Network Rainfall-Runoff Models, Appl. Soft Comput., 2006, 6, p 295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the University of Tehran for this research under the Grant number 8107001/1/01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Zarei-Hanzaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirzaei, A., Zarei-Hanzaki, A., Pishbin, M.H. et al. Evaluating the Hot Deformation Behavior of a Super-Austenitic Steel Through Microstructural and Neural Network Analysis. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 24, 2412–2421 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-015-1518-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-015-1518-x

Keywords

Navigation