Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Routine Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Gastric Bypass Patients: Impact on Length of Stay and 30-Day Readmission Rate

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an effective treatment for morbid obesity. Current average length of hospital stay (LOS) after RYGB is 2–3 days and 30-day readmission rate is 8–13 %. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of routine gastrostomy tube placement in perioperative outcomes of RYGB patients.

Methods

Between January 2008 and December 2010, a total of 840 patients underwent RYGB at our institution. All RYGB patients had gastrostomy tube placed, which was kept for 6 weeks. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed for all RYGB patients, noting the outcomes and complications of the procedure.

Results

Average LOS in our patient population was 1.1 days (range, 1–14 days), and 824 (98.3 %) patients were discharged on postoperative day 1. Readmissions within 30 days after the index RYGB was observed in 31 (3.7 %) patients. Reasons included abdominal pain (n = 14), nausea/vomiting (n = 6), gastrostomy tube-related complications (n = 5), chest pain (n = 3), allergic reaction (n = 1), urinary tract infection (n = 1), and dehydration (n = 1). Of these readmitted patients, nine (1.1 %) patients required reoperations due to small bowel obstruction (n = 5), perforated anastomotic ulcer (n = 1), anastomotic leak (n = 1), subphrenic abscess (n = 1), and appendicitis (n = 1).

Conclusions

Routine gastrostomy tube placement in the gastric remnant at the time of RYGB seems to have contributed to our short LOS and low 30-day readmission rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freedman DS, Khan LK, Serdula MK, et al. Trends and correlates of class 3 obesity in the United States from 1990 through 2000. JAMA. 2002;288:1758–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2001;234:279–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lujan JA, Frutos MD, Hernandez Q, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study. Ann Surg. 2004;239:433–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinbrook R. Surgery for severe obesity. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1075–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley DW, Sharma BK. Centers of excellence in bariatric surgery: design, implementation, and one-year outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2:513–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis MM, Slish K, Caho C, et al. National trends in bariatric surgery, 1996–2002. Arch Surg. 2006;141:71–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saunders J, Ballantyne GH, Belsley S, et al. One-year readmission rates at a high volume bariatric surgery center: laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic gastric bypass, and vertical banded gastroplasty–Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1233–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lancaster RT, Hutter MM. Bands and bypasses: 30-day morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgical procedures as assessed by prospective, multi-center, risk-adjusted ACS-NSQUIP data. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2554–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker MT, Lara MD, Larson CJ, et al. Length of stay and impact on readmission rates after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2:435–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dallal RM, Trang A. Analysis of perioperative outcomes, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate after gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:754–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho M, Kaidar-Person O, Szomstein S, et al. Emergency room visits after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:104–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dallal RM, Datta T, Braitman LE, et al. Medicare and Medicaid status predicts prolonged length of stay after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:592–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DeMaria EJ, Pate V, Warthen M, et al. Baseline data from American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery-designated Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence using the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:347–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goitein D, Gagne DJ, Papasavas PK, et al. Percutaneous computed tomography-guided gastric remnant access after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2:651–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nosher JL, Bodner LJ, Girgis WS, et al. Percutaneous gastrostomy for treating dilatation of the bypassed stomach after bariatric surgery for morbid obesity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1431–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fobi MAL, Lee H. The surgical technique of the Fobi-pouch operation for obesity (the transected silastic vertical gastric bypass). Obes Surg. 1998;8:283–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wood MH, Sapala JA, Sapala MA, et al. Micropouch gastric bypass: indications for gastrostomy tube placement in the bypassed stomach. Obes Surg. 2000;10:413–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huerta S, Heber D, Sawicki MP, et al. Reduced length of stay by implementation of a clinical pathway for bariatric surgery in an academic care center. Am Surg. 2001;67:1128–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McCarty TM, Arnold DT, Lamont JP, et al. Optimizing outcomes of bariatric surgery: outpatient laparoscopic gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2005;242:494–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fobi MA, Chicola K, Lee H. Access to the bypassed stomach after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 1998;8:289–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bariatric Surgery, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Bariatric and Laparoscopy Center, Orlando Health, 89 Copeland Ave, 1st Floor, Orlando, FL, 32806, USA

    Rena Moon, Andre Teixeira & Muhammad A. Jawad

  2. Department of Bariatric Surgery, Ocala Regional Medical Center, Ocala, FL, USA

    Kelly Potenza

Authors
  1. Rena Moon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andre Teixeira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kelly Potenza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammad A. Jawad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad A. Jawad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moon, R., Teixeira, A., Potenza, K. et al. Routine Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Gastric Bypass Patients: Impact on Length of Stay and 30-Day Readmission Rate. OBES SURG 23, 216–221 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0835-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0835-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation