Abstract
Through the 1980s Confucian studies in the United States tended to present Confucianism as compatible with liberal democratic values. Since the 1990s, after the rise of China as a global power, Confucianism is increasingly defended as a political alternative to liberal and democratic values. This essay argues that Confucianism is not compatible with liberal democratic values, and that the rise of political Confucianism opposed to liberal democracy is a return to a more authentic Confucianism. Furthermore, it is argued that the defense of this undemocratic and illiberal Confucianism in the West, notably by Stephen C. Angle and Daniel A. Bell, reflects and reveals the precarious state of democracy in our present historical moment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angle, Stephen C. 2005a. “Decent Democratic Centralism.” Political Theory 33.4: 518–546.
______. 2005b. “Must We Choose Our Leaders? Human Rights and Political Participation in China.” Journal of Global Ethics 1.2: 177–196.
______. 2012. Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity.
Arrighi, Giovanni. 2007. Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. London: Verso.
Bell, Daniel A. 2010a. “Reconciling Socialism and Confucianism: Reviving Tradition in China.” Dissent (Winter): 91–99.
______. 2010b. “Daniel A. Bell Replies.” Dissent (Winter): 101–102.
Brandom, Robert B. 2000. “Introduction.” In Rorty and His Critics, edited by Robert B. Brandom. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fingarette, Herbert. 1972. Confucius––The Secular as Sacred. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Jacques, Martin. 2009. When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order. New York: The Penguin Press.
Jiang, Qing. 2013. “The Way of the Humane Authority: The Theoretical Basis for Confucian Constitutionalism and a Tricameral Parliament.” In A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future, edited by Daniel A. Bell and Fan Ruiping. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Knoblock, John. 1994. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works, Volume III, Books 17–32. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lewis, Mark Edward. 1999. Writing and Authority in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Madsen, Richard. 1995. “After Liberalism: What If Confucianism Becomes the Hegemonic Ethic of the Twenty-first Century?” Japan Policy Research Institute, JPRI Working Paper No. 14.
Mann, James. 2007. The China Fantasy: How Our Leaders Explain Away Chinese Repression. New York: Viking Penguin.
Rancière, Jacques. 2006. Hatred of Democracy. London: Verso.
Rorty, Richard M. 2009. “Responses to Critics.” In Rorty, Pragmatism, and Confucianism: With Responses by Richard Rorty, edited by Huang Yong. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Sapio, Flora. 2010. Sovereign Power and the
Lawin China. Leiden: Brill.Walzer, Michael. 2010. “Michael Walzer Responds.” Dissent (Winter): 100–101.
Žižek, Slavoj. 2002. “Are We in a War? Do We Have an Enemy?” London Review of Books 24.10: 3–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Møllgaard, E.J. Political Confucianism and the Politics of Confucian Studies. Dao 14, 391–402 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-015-9448-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-015-9448-8