Skip to main content
Log in

David Wong’s Interpretation of Confucian Moral Psychology

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abarbanell, Linda, and Marc Hauser. 2010. “Mayan Morality: An Exploration of Permissible Harms.” Cognition 30: 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Analects. 2006–2017. Chinese Text Project. Edited by Donald Sturgeon. http://ctext.org/analect (last accessed July 10, 2017).

  • Barbey, Aron, and Steve Sloman, 2007. “Base-Rate Respect: From Ecological Validity to Dual Processes.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30: 241–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1993. “Principles and Parameters Theory.” In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, edited by J. Jacobs et al. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, David, Baldwin Way, Naomi Eisenberger, and Matthew Lieberman. 2007. “Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness during Affect Labeling.” Psychosomatic Medicine 69: 560–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, Fiery, Liane Young, and Marc Hauser. 2006. “The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment: Testing Three Principles of Harm.” Psychological Science 17: 1082–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, Jean, and Jason M. Cowell. 2014. “Friends or Foes: Is Empathy Necessary for Moral Behavior?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 9.4: 525–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, Susan. 1999. “Moral Competence.” In Philosophy and Linguistics, edited by Murasugi Kumiko and Robert Stainton. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Jonathan St. B. T., Paulo Legrenzi, and Vittorio Girotto. 1999. “The Influence of Linguistic Form on Reasoning: The Case of Matching Bias.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52.1: 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farb, Norman, Adam Anderson, and Zindel Segal. 2012. “The Mindful Brain and Emotion Regulation in Mood Disorders.” Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 57.2: 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, Vinod, and Raymond Dolan. 2003. “Explaining Modulation of Reasoning by Belief.” Cognition 87.1: B11–B22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Martin, Gary Brendel, Oliver Tuescher, Hong Pan, Jane Epstein, Manfred Beutel, Yihong Yang, Katherine Thomas, Kenneth Levy, Michael Silverman, Jonathan Clarkin, Michael Posner, Otto Kemberg, Emily Stern, and David Silbersweig. 2007. “Neural Substrates of the Interaction of Emotional Stimulus Processing and Motor Inhibitory Control: An Emotional Linguistic Go/No-Go fMRI Study.” Neuroimage 36.3: 1026–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Joshua. 2008. “The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul.” In Moral Psychology, vol. 3, edited by W. Sinnott-Armstrong. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Greene, Joshua, Brian Sommerville, Leigh Nystrom, John Darley, and Jonathan Cohen. 2001. “An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment.” Science 293.5537: 2105–2108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Joshua, Sylvia Morelli, Kelly Lowenberg, Leigh Nystrom, and Jonathan Cohen. 2008. “Cognitive Load Selectively Interferes with Utilitarian Moral Judgment.” Cognition 107.3: 1144–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Joshua, Leigh Nystrom, Andrew Engell, John Darley, and Jonathan Cohen. 2004. “The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment.” Neuron 44.2: 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert. 1999. “Moral Philosophy and Linguistics.” In Proceedings of the 20th World Congress of Philosophy, vol. 1: Ethics, edited by Klaus Brinkmann. Bowling Green, OH: Philosophy Documentation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, Marc. 2006. Moral Minds: The Nature of Right and Wrong. New York: Ecco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1993. Confucian Moral Self Cultivation. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel. 2003. “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics.” American Economic Review 93: 1449–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, Ulrich, Jonathan Downar, and Read Montague. 2011. “Interoception Drives Increased Rational Decision-Making in Meditators Playing the Ultimatum Game.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 5.49: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mencius. 2006–2017. Chinese Text Project. Edited by Donald Sturgeon. http://ctext.org/mengzi (last accessed July 10, 2017).

  • Mikhail, John. 2000. Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy: A Study of the “Generative Grammar” Model of Moral Theory Described by John Rawls in A Theory of Justice. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

  • ______. 2007. “Universal Moral Grammar: Theory, Evidence, and the Future.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11.4: 143–152.

  • ______. 2011. Elements of Moral Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Moll, Jorge, Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza, and Roland Zahn. 2008. “The Neural Basis of Moral Cognition: Sentiments, Concepts, and Values.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124: 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moshman, David. 2000. “Diversity in Reasoning and Rationality: Metacognitive and Developmental Considerations.” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 23: 689–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nivison, David. 1996. “The Paradox of Virtue.” In The Ways of Confucianism, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlstein, William M., Thomas Elbert, and Andrew V. Stenger. 2002. “Dissociation in Human Prefrontal Cortex of Affective Influences on Working Memory-Related Activity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99.3: 1736–1741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, Luiz. 2008. “On the Relationship between Emotion and Cognition.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9: 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Effortless Action: Wu-Wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2014. Trying Not to Try. New York: Broadway Books.

  • Sloman, Steven A. 1996. “The Empirical Case for Two Systems of Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 119: 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Eliot R., and Jamie DeCoster. 2000. “Dual-Process Models in Social and Cognitive Psychology: Conceptual Integration and Links to Underlying Memory Systems.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 4: 108–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, Elliot. 1998. “Innate Knowledge.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 4, edited by Edward Craig. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, Keith E. 1999. Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, Keith E., and Richard F. West. 2000. “Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 645–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stich, Stephen. 1975. “Introduction: The Idea of Innateness.” In Innate Ideas, edited by Stephen Stich. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Norden, Bryan. 2007. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, David. 2013. “Chinese Ethics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-chinese/ (last accessed December 4, 2016).

  • ______. 2015. “Early Confucian Philosophy and the Development of Compassion.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14: 157–194.

  • Xunzi, The Complete Text. 2014. Trans. by Eric Hutton. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bongrae Seok.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seok, B. David Wong’s Interpretation of Confucian Moral Psychology. Dao 16, 559–575 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-017-9578-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-017-9578-2

Navigation