Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Confucius and Kierkegaard: A Compatibilist Account of Social Ontology, Acquired Selfhood, and the Sources of Normativity

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nearly all of the scant comparative work on Søren Kierkegaard and Confucius places the two starkly at odds with each other. Kierkegaard is pictured as the paradigmatic exemplar of the Western self: a discrete rights-bearing and volitional atom who is quite alone in the world, while Confucius, by contrast, is the paradigmatic exemplar of the Eastern self: a complex and irreducibly embedded communitarian bundle of relations and rich social roles. In this article, I challenge this oppositional approach, since it is both erroneous and obscures fruitful dialogue between the two on conceptually commensurate problems. I argue (1) that Kierkegaard offers a relational ontology of the self which moves in a Confucian direction, (2) that subjectivity and relational reciprocity are not fundamentally at odds in the two thinkers, (3) that both thinkers value a life of harmonious integration that entails right relation to others, and finally (4) that Confucius’ appeal to Heaven as a source of normativity allows for salutary social critique of prevailing ethical norms and practices, in a way that provides important comparative insights with Kierkegaardian theism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Robert Merrihew. 2009. A Theory of Virtue: Excellence in Being for the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics, 2nd ed. Trans. and introduced by Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett.

  • Carson, Nathan P. 2007. At the Heart of Anthropology: Søren Kierkegaard and Walker Percy on the Nature and Shape of Relational Selfhood. Unpublished Th.M. Thesis. Vancouver: Regent College.

  • ______. 2013. “Poetic Representation and Existential Time: On Kierkegaard’s Reduction of Literary Art to Subjective Communication.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 30.3: 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, George B. 1992. “Judge William’s Theonomous Ethics.” In Foundations of Kierkegaard’s Vision of Community, edited by George B. Connell and C. Stephen Evans. New Jersey/London: Humanities Press.

  • ______. 2009. “Kierkegaard and Confucius: The Religious Dimensions of Ethical Selfhood.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8.2: 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crites, Stephen. 1992. “The Sickness Unto Death: A Social Interpretation.” In Foundations of Kierkegaard’s Vision of Community, edited by George B. Connell and C. Stephen Evans. New Jersey/London: Humanities Press.

  • Davenport, John J., and Anthony Rudd, eds. 2001. Kierkegaard After MacIntyre: Essays on Freedom, Narrative, and Virtue. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupre, Louis. 1985. “Of Time and Eternity.” In International Kierkegaard Commentary 8: The Concept of Anxiety, edited by Robert L. Perkins. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.

  • Evans, C. Stephen. 2004. Kierkegaard’s Ethic of Love: Divine Commands and Moral Obligations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2006a. “Who Is the Other in Sickness Unto Death? God and Human Relations in the Constitution of the Self.” In C. Stephen Evans, Kierkegaard on Faith and the Self: Collected Essays. Waco: Baylor University Press.

  • ______. 2006b. “Faith as the Telos of Morality: A Reading of Fear and Trembling.” In C. Stephen Evans, Kierkegaard on Faith and the Self: Collected Essays. Waco: Baylor University Press.

  • ______. 2009. Kierkegaard: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, Herbert. 1983. “The Music of Humanity in the Conversations of Confucius.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 10.4: 331–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 1998. Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2008. “Discovering the Analects.” In Confucius Now: Contemporary Encounters with the Analects, edited by David Jones. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.

  • Gier, Nicholas F. 2001. “The Dancing Ru: A Confucian Aesthetics of Virtue.” Philosophy East and West 51.2: 280–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, Paul R. 2011. Confucianism. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grøn, Arne. 2000. “The Human Synthesis.” In Anthropology and Authority: Essays on Søren Kierkegaard, edited by Paul Houe, Gordon D. Marino, and Sven Hakon Rossel. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ivanhoe, Philip. 2007. “Heaven as a Source for Ethical Warrant in Early Confucianism.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6.3: 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2008. “The ‘Golden Rule’ in the Analects.” In Confucius Now: Contemporary Encounters with the Analects, edited by David Jones. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.

  • Johnson, Daniel M. 2012. “Social Morality and Social Misfits: Confucius, Hegel, and the Attack of Zhuangzi and Kierkegaard.” Asian Philosophy 22.4: 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Hwa Yol. 1969. “Confucianism and Existentialism: Intersubjectivity as the Way of Man.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30.2: 186–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, Søren Aabye. 1958. The Journals of Kierkegaard. Trans. and edited by Alexander Dru. New York: Harper and Row.

  • ______. 1966. The Concept of Irony with Constant Reference to Socrates. Trans. by Lee Capel. London: Collins.

  • ______. 1970. Søren Kierkegaard’s Journals and Papers, vol. 2. Trans. and edited by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • ______. 1980a. The Concept of Anxiety: A Simple Psychologically Orienting Deliberation on the Dogmatic Issue of Hereditary Sin. Trans. and edited by Reidar Thomte, in collaboration with Albert B. Anderson. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • ______. 1980b. The Sickness Unto Death: A Christian Psychological Exposition for Edification and Awakening by Anti-Climacus. Trans. and edited by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • ______. 1987a. Either/Or, part I. Trans. and edited by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • ______. 1987b. Either/Or, part II. Trans. and edited by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • ______. 1990. For Self Examination; Judge for Yourself!. Trans. and edited by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • ______. 1991. Practice in Christianity. Trans. and edited by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • ______. 1992. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, vol. I. Trans. and edited by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • ______. 1993. Upbuilding Discourses in Various Spirits. Trans. by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • ______. 1995. Works of Love. Trans. and edited by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • ______. 1997. Christian Discourses; The Crisis and A Crisis in the Life of an Actress. Trans. and edited by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • ______. 1998. The Point of View. Trans. and edited by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • ______. 2004. The Sickness Unto Death: A Christian Psychological Exposition for Edification and Awakening by Anti-Climacus. Trans. by Alastair Hannay. London: Penguin.

  • ______. 2006. Fear and Trembling. Edited by C. Stephen Evans and Sylvia Walsh, and trans. by Sylvia Walsh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kim, Sungmoon. 2014. Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, Christine. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Legge, James, ed. and trans. 1970. The Works of Mencius. New York: Dover Publications.

  • Lillegard, Norman. 1995. “Judge William in the Dock: MacIntyre on Kierkegaardian Ethics.” In International Kierkegaard Commentary, Either/Or Part II, edited by Robert L. Perkins. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.

  • Louden, Robert. 2002. “‘What Does Heaven Say?’: Christian Wolff and Western Interpretations of Confucian Ethics.” In Confucius and the Analects: New Essays, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2007. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 3rd ed. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, Edward. 1992. “Getting Isaac Back: Ordeals and Reconciliations in Fear and Trembling.” In Foundations of Kierkegaard’s Vision of Community, edited by George B. Connell and C. Stephen Evans. New Jersey/London: Humanities Press.

  • Moyar, Dean. 2011. Hegel’s Conscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Robert C. 1998. “Existence, Emotion, and Virtue: Classical Themes in Kierkegaard.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kierkegaard, edited by Alasdair Hannay and Gordon D. Marino. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • ______. 2013. Emotions in the Moral Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosemont, Jr., Henry. 1986. “Kierkegaard and Confucius: On Finding the Way.” Philosophy East and West 36.3: 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2008. “An Unintegrated Life Is Not Worth Living.” In Confucius Now: Contemporary Encounters with the Analects, edited by David Jones. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.

  • Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shun, Kwong-Loi. 2002. “Ren and Li in the Analects.” In Confucius and the Analects: New Essays, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Effortless Action: Wu-Wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • ______. 2006. The Essential Analects: Selected Passages with Traditional Commentary. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.

  • Slote, Michael. 2003. Morals from Motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Mark C. 1973. “Time’s Struggle with Space: Soren Kierkegaard’s Understanding of Temporality.” The Harvard Theological Review 66.3: 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zyl, Liezl. 2013. “Virtue Ethics and Right Action.” In The Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics, edited by Daniel C. Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Sylvia. 1994. Living Poetically: Kierkegaard’s Existential Aesthetics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

  • Wilson, Stephen A. 2002. “Conformity, Individuality, and the Nature of Virtue: A Classical Confucian Contribution to Contemporary Ethical Reflection.” In Confucius and the Analects: New Essays, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Yearley, Lee. 2002. “An Existentialist Reading of Book 4 of the Analects.” In Confucius and the Analects: New Essays, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Yu, Jiyuan. 2007. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of Virtue. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Fresno Pacific University, 1717 S. Chestnut Avenue, Fresno, CA, 93702, USA

    Nathan Carson

Authors
  1. Nathan Carson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan Carson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carson, N. Confucius and Kierkegaard: A Compatibilist Account of Social Ontology, Acquired Selfhood, and the Sources of Normativity. Dao 17, 499–525 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-018-9626-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-018-9626-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation