Zusammenfassung
Anliegen der Studie war die Erprobung der diagnostischen Potenziale von Merkmalen des Tatverhaltens, das Täter mit sexuellem Missbrauch von Kindern zeigen, im Hinblick auf Indikatoren für zugrunde liegende pädophile Neigungen und die Entwicklung einer hierauf fußenden Skala. Die Entwicklungsstichprobe bestand aus 113 Fällen des Gutachtenarchivs des Instituts für Forensische Psychiatrie, Charité Berlin, und setzte sich zu vergleichbaren Anteilen aus Tätern mit (n = 50) und ohne (n = 63) klinische Diagnose einer Pädophilie zusammen. Auf der Basis theoretischer Überlegung und empirischer Erkenntnisse wurden 6 tatbasierte diagnostisch relevante Inhaltsbereiche bestimmt, denen 23 Variablen zugeordnet wurden. Mittels multivariater Analysen wurde hieraus die aus 7 Items bestehende Screening Skala Pädophilen Tatverhaltens (SSPT) entwickelt. Das Instrument zeigte eine ausgesprochen gute Klassifikationsgenauigkeit im Hinblick auf die klinische Diagnose [„area under the curve“ (AUC) = 0,91; „standard error“ (SE) = 0,03] und war gegenüber der Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interest (SSPI ) inkrementell valide. Insgesamt stellt die SSPT einen vielversprechenden Ansatz als diagnostisches Hilfsmittel für die Diagnose einer Pädophilie dar, das grundsätzlich geeignet erscheint, die Abhängigkeit von Selbsteinschätzungen und der Auskunftsbereitschaft von Probanden im Hinblick auf pädophile Fantasien und Bedürfnisse zu verringern.
Abstract
The importance of including crime scene information into the diagnostic process and into risk assessment is emphasized throughout the literature. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to investigate the feasibility of identifying pedophilic interest in child molesters using crime scene information. The development sample consisted of 113 expert opinions in forensic cases of sexual child abuse. The sample covered 50 pedophilic and 63 non-pedophilic offenders. Based on theoretical and empirical considerations it was concluded that the study should capture 6 content areas including 24 variables. Multivariate analyses revealed that the seven items that comprise the screening scale of pedophilic criminal behavior (SSPC) showed high predictive accuracy for the diagnosis of pedophilia (area under the curve AUC = 0.91, standard error SE = 0.03) and had incremental validity above and beyond the screening scale for pedophilic interest (SSPI).
Notes
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems.
Literatur
Banse R, Schmidt AF, Clarbour J (2010) Indirect measures of sexual interest in child sex offenders: a multimethod approach. Crim Just Behav 37:319–335. doi:10.1177/0093854809357598
Beier KM (1995) Dissexualität im Lebenslängsschnitt. Springer Berlin, Berlin
Bennell C, Alison LJ, Stein KL, Alison EK, Canter DV (2001) Sexual offenses against children as the abusive exploitation of conventional adult-child relationships. J Soc Pers Relat 18:155–171. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407501182001
Biedermann J (2013) Die Klassifikation von Sexualstraftätern anhand ihres Tatverhaltens im Kontext der Rückfallprognose und Prävention. Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft, Frankfurt.
Blanchard R (2010) The DSM diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. Arch Sex Behav 39:304–316. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9536-0
Blanchard R, Klassen P, Dickey R, Kuban ME, Blak T (2001) Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychol Ass 13:118–126. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.1.118
Blanchard R, Lykins A, Wherrett D, Kuban M, Cantor J, Blak T, Klassen P (2009) Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Arch Sex Behav 38:335–350. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9
Briken P, Rettenberger M, Dekker A (2013) Was sagen „objektive“ Messverfahren über Sexualstraftäter? Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 7:28–33. doi:10.1007/s11757-012-0192-1
Bundeskriminalamt (2012) Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik (PKS) 2012. http://www.bka.de/DE/Publikationen/PolizeilicheKriminalstatistik/pks__node.html. Zugegriffen: 08. Aug. 2013
Burgess AW, Groth AN, Holmstrom LL (1978) Sexual assault of children and adolescents. Lexington, Lexington
Campbell AM (2009) False faces and broken lives: an exploratory study of the interaction behaviors used by male sex offenders in relating to victims. J Lang Soc Psychol 28:428–440. doi:10.1177/0261927x09341948
Cohen LJ, Galynker II (2002) Clinical features of pedophilia and implications for treatment. J Psychiatr Pract 8: 276–289
Cohen M, Seghorn T, Calmas W (1969) Sociometric study of the sex offender. J Abnorm Psychol 74:249–255. doi:10.1037/h0027185
Dahle K-P, Biedermann J, Gallasch-Nemitz F, Janka C (2010) Zur rückfallprognostischen Bedeutung des Tatverhaltens bei Sexualdelinquenz. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 4:126–135. doi:10.1007/s11757-010-0041-z
Eher R, Rettenberger M, Schilling F (2010) Psychiatrische Diagnosen von Sexualstraftätern. Z Sex Forsch 23:23–35. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247274
First MB (2010) DSM-5 proposals for paraphilias: suggestions for reducing false positives related to use of behavioral manifestations. Arch Sex Behav 39:1239–1244. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9657-5
Hall RC, Hall RC (2007) A profile of pedophilia: definition, characteristics of offenders, recidivism, treatment outcomes, and forensic issues. Mayo Clin Proc 82:457–471. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4065/82.4.457
Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE (2005) The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. J Consult Clin Psychol 73:1154–1163. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
Jackson RL, Hess DT (2007) Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: a survey of experts. Sexual abuse: a J Res Treatment 19:425–448. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11194-007-9062-3
Kersting M (2003) Grundrate. In: Kubinger KD, Jäger RS (Hrsg) Schlüsselbegriffe der Psychologischen Diagnostik. Beltz, Weinheim, S 183–186
Kingston D, Firestone P, Moulden H, Bradford J (2007) The utility of the diagnosis of pedophilia: a comparison of various classification procedures. Arch Sex Behav 36:423–436. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9091-x
Lang R, Rouget AC, Santen V (1988) The role of victim age and sexual maturity in child sexual abuse. Ann Sex Res 1:467–484. doi:10.1007/BF00854711
Lanning KV (2010) Child molesters: a behavioral analysis. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, Washington, DC
Lehmann RJB, Goodwill AM, Gallasch-Nemitz F, Biedermann J, Dahle K-P (2013) Applying crime scene analysis to the prediction of sexual recidivism in stranger rapes. Law Hum Behav 37:241–254. doi:10.1037/lhb0000015
Lehmann RJ, Goodwill AM, Hanson RK, Dahle KP (in press) Crime scene behaviors indicate risk relevant propensities of child molesters. Criminal Justice Behavior
Looman, J., Gauthier, C., & Boer, D. (2001). Replication of the Massachusetts treatment center child molester typology in a Canadian sample. J Interpers Violence 16:753–767. doi:10.1177/088626001016008002
Marshall WL, Kennedy P, Yates P, Serran G (2002) Diagnosing sexual sadism in sexual offenders: reliability across diagnosticians. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 46:668–677. DOI 10.1177/0306624x02238161
McAlinden A-M (2006) ‚Setting ’Em Up‘: personal, familial and institutional grooming in the sexual abuse of children. Soc Legal Stud 15:339–362. doi:10.1177/0964663906066613
Mokros A, Osterheider M, Nitschke J (2012) Pädophilie. Nervenarzt 83:355–358. doi:10.1007/s00115-011-3322-7
Mokros A, Schilling F, Eher R, Nitschke J (2012) The severe sexual sadism scale: cross-validation and scale properties. Psychol Ass 24:764–769. doi:10.1037/a0026419
Murray JB (2000) Psychological profile of pedophiles and child molesters. J Psychol 134:211–224. doi:10.1080/00223980009600863
Nitschke J, Mokros A, Osterheider M, Marshall WL (2012) Sexual sadism: current diagnostic vagueness and the benefit of behavioral definitions. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. doi:10.1177/0306624x12465923
Nitschke J, Osterheider M, Mokros A (2009) A cumulative scale of severe sexual sadism. Sexual abuse 21:262–278. doi:10.1177/1079063209342074
Nitschke J, Osterheider M, Mokros A (2011) Forensisch-psychiatrische Begutachtung bei Pädophilie. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 79:535–540. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1281616
O’Donohue W, Regev L, Hagstrom A (2000) Problems with the DSM-IV diagnosis of pedophilia. Sexual abuse 12:95–105. doi:10.1023/A:1009586023326
Olson LN, Daggs JL, Ellevold BL, Rogers TK (2007) Entrapping the innocent: toward a theory of child sexual predators’ luring communication. Communication Theory 17:231–251. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00294.x
Prentky RA, Knight RA, Lee AF (1997). Risk factors associated with recidivism among extrafamilial child molesters. J Consult Clin Psychol 65:141–149. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.65.1.141
Randau W (2006)Tatmuster bei sexuellem Missbrauch von Kindern und Jugendlichen. http://kops.ub.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/handle/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-19567/Diss_Randau.pdf?sequence=1. Zugegriffen: 08. Aug. 2013
Riggs N, Houry D, Long G, Markovchick V, Feldhaus KM (2000) Analysis of 1,076 cases of sexual assault. Ann Emerg Med 35:358–362. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(00)70054-0
Schmidt AF, Banse R, Imhoff R (in press) Indirect measures in forensic contexts. In: van de Vijver FJR, Ortner T (Hrsg) Behavior based assessment in personality, social, and applied psychology. Hogrefe, Göttingen
Schmidt AF, Gykiere K, Vanhoeck K, Mann RE, Banse R (2013) Direct and indirect measures of sexual maturity preferences differentiate subtypes of child sexual abusers. Sexual abuse. doi:10.1177/1079063213480817
Seto MC (2009) Pedophilia. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 5:391–407. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153618
Seto MC, Cantor JM, Blanchard R (2006) Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. J Abnorm Psychol 115:610–615. DOI 10.1037/0021-843X.115.3.610
Seto MC, Harris GT, Rice ME, Barbaree HE (2004) The screening scale for pedophilic interests predicts recidivism among adult sex offenders with child victims. Arch Sex Behav 33:455–466. doi:10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037426.55935.9c
Seto MC, Lalumiére ML (2001) A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sexual abuse13:15–25. DOI 10.1023/A:1009510328588
Wetzels P (1997) Zur Epidemiologie von physischer und sexueller Gewalterfahrungen in der Kindheit. Kriminologisches Forschungsinstitut Niedersachsen e. V. (KFN). http://www.edit.kfn.de/versions/kfn/assets/fb59.pdf. Zugegriffen: 08. Aug. 2013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dahle, KP., Lehmann, R. & Richter, A. Die Screening Skala Pädophilen Tatverhaltens. Forens Psychiatr Psychol Kriminol 8, 208–215 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11757-014-0261-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11757-014-0261-8
Schlüsselwörter
- Sexueller Kindesmissbrauch
- Pädophilie
- Tatverhalten
- „Screening scale for pedophilic interest“
- „Screening scale of pedophilic criminal behavior“