Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental research on the seismic behavior of CSPSWs connected to frame beams

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The seismic performance of composite steel plate shear walls (CSPSWs) that consist of a steel plate shear wall (SPSW) with reinforced concrete (RC) panels attached to one or both sides by means of bolts or connectors is experimentally studied. The shear wall is connected to the frame beams but not to the columns. This arrangement restrains the possible out-of-plane buckling of the thin-walled steel plate, thus significantly increasing the bearing capacity and ductility of the overall wall, and prevents the premature overall or local buckling failure of the frame columns. From a practical viewpoint, these solutions can provide open space in a floor as this type of composite shear walls with a relatively small aspect ratio can be placed parallel along a bay. In this study, four CSPSWs and one SPSW were tested and the results showed that both CSPSWs and SPSW possessed good ductility. For SPSW alone, the buckling appeared and resulted in a decrease of bearing capacity and energy dissipation capacity. In addition, welding stiffeners at corners were shown to be an effective way to increase the energy dissipation capacity of CSPSWs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astaneh-Asl A (2002), “Seismic Behavior and Design of Composite Steel Plate Shear Walls,” Steel Tips Report, Structural Steel Educational Council, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver RG, Kulak GL, Kennedy DJ L and Elwi AE (1997), “Seismic Behavior of Steel Plate Shear Walls,” Structural Engineering Report 215, University of Alberta, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, February 1997.

  • Elgaaly M, Caccese V and Martin DK (1993), “Experimental Investigation of the Behavior of Bolted Thin Steel Plate Shear Walls,” Engineering Report, Civil Engineering Department, University of Maine, Orono, Maine

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan N (2008), “Experimental Research and Theoretical Analysis on Behavior of Two-side Connected Steelconcrete Composite Shear Walls,” Dissertation for the Master’s Degree in Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo YL, Dong QL and Zhou M (2009), “Tests and Analysis on Hysteretic Behavior of Buckling-restrained Steel Plate Shear Wall, Journal of Building Structures, 30(1): 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitaka T and Matsui C (2003), “Experimental Study on Steel Shear Wall with Slits,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 129(5): 586–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell A, Prion H, Ventura C and Rezai M (2000), “Unstiffened Steel Plate Shear Wall Performance under Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 126(4): 453–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu B, Bruneau M, Lin CH and Tsai KC (2008), “Testing of Full-scale Two-story Steel Plate Shear Wall with Reduced Beam Section Connections and Composite Floors,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 134(3): 364–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts T and Sabouri-Ghomi S (1991), “Hysteretic Characteristics of Unstiffened Plate Shear Panels,” Thin Walled Structures, 12(2):145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun FF, Li GQ and Gao H (2007), “Experimental Research on Seismic Behavior of Two-side Composite Steel Plate Walls,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Steel and Composite Structures (ICSCS07), Manchester, UK: 805–811.

  • Thorburn LJ, Kulak GL and Montgomery CJ (1983), “Analysis of Steel Plate Shear Walls,” Structural Engineering Report No.107, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timber PA and Kulak GL (1993), “Experimental Study of Steel Plate Shear Walls,” Structural Engineering Report No. 114, University of Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai KC, Lin YC and Lin CH (2007), “Seismic Responses and Design of Steel Plate Shear Wall,” Progress in Steel Building Structures, 9(5):19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue M and Lu LW (1994), “Monotonic and Cyclic Behavior of Infilled Steel Shear Panels,” Proceedings of 17th Czech and Slovak International Conference on Steel Structures and Bridges, Bratislava, Slovakia.

  • Zhang SM, Wu ZJ and Ma XB (2008), “Influence of Precast Concrete Plate on Static Behavior of Steelconcrete Composite Shear Wall,” Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 25(1): 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Q and Astaneh-Asl A (2004), “Cyclic Behavior of Traditional and Innovative Composite Shear Walls,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 130(2): 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lanhui Guo.

Additional information

Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China Under Grant No. 50478029 and No. 50808053; National Science & Technology Support Program of 11th 5-Year Plan Under Grant No. 2006BAJ01B02

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guo, L., Ma, X., Li, R. et al. Experimental research on the seismic behavior of CSPSWs connected to frame beams. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 10, 65–73 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-011-0047-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-011-0047-3

Keywords

Navigation