Skip to main content
Log in

Amino acid profiling of Sorghum bicolor vis-à-vis Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) for biochemical interactions and plant resistance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amount of certain amino acids required by herbivores, and their availability in host plants are of crucial importance for insect growth, development, and life processes. Therefore, we carried out profiling and quantification of 17 amino acids in diverse sorghum genotypes, and on the Chilo partellus larvae reared on them, to understand the association and contribution of different amino acids in plant resistance to insects. Sorghum germplasm lines IS 2205 and IS 2123 had severe detrimental effects on the development and survival of C. partellus followed by varieties ICSV 700 and ICSV 708 in comparison to susceptible check, Swarna. Profiling of sorghum seedlings, seeds, and the C. partellus larvae fed on these genotypes for 17 amino acids revealed that Arginine, Glycine, Isoleucine, Leucine, Proline, and Valine in sorghum seedlings and the C. partellus larvae had significant and positive association, suggesting their role in the development and survival, while negative association of Cystine indicated its contribution in plant defense. Furthermore, C. partellus acquired less of cyclic and aliphatic amino acids per unit amount from the test resistant genotypes, while more from the susceptible check, than their presence in the seedlings. Present studies suggest that Alanine, Cystine, Glycine, and Proline contents in C. partellus larvae; Cystine and Proline contents in sorghum seedlings; and Methionine content in sorghum seeds, have significant and negative association, and contribute to explain >93% and >96%, respectively, of the variability in antibiosis mechanism and overall resistance to C. partellus. These studies have implications for antibiosis and nutritional mechanism of host plant–insect interactions in sorghum against C. partellus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auclair JL (1963) Aphid feeding and nutrition. Annu Rev Entomol 8:439–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auclair JL (1976) Feeding and nutrition of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), with special reference to amino acids. Symp Biol Hung 16:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Auclair JL, Maltais JB, Cartier JJ (1957) Factors in resistance of peas to the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Homoptera: Aphididae). II. Amino acids. Can Entomol 10:457–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck SD (1972) Nutrition, adaptation and environment. In: Rodriguez JG (ed) Insect and mite nutrition: significance and implications in ecology and pest management. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman RF (1998) The Insects: Structure and Function, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH, Bernal CC, Tan J, Horgan FG, Fitzgerald MA (2011) Planthopper ‘‘adaptation’’ to resistant rice varieties: changes in amino acid composition over time. J Insect Physiol 57:1375–1384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiozza MV, O’Neal ME, MacIntosh GC (2010) Constitutive and induced differential accumulation of amino acid in leaves of susceptible and resistant soybean plants in response to the soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Environ Entomol 39:856–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dadd RH (1970) Arthropod nutrition. In: Florkin M, Scheer BT (eds) Chemical ecology. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadd RH (1985) Nutrition: organisms. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comparative insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology, vol 4. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 313–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon MK, Chaudhary DP (2015) Biochemical interactions for antibiosis mechanism of resistance to Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in different maize types. Arthropod Plant Interact 9(4):373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon MK, Sharma HC, Singh R, Naresh JS (2005) Mechanisms of resistance to shoot fly, Atherigona soccata in sorghum. Euphytica 144:301–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon MK, Kumar S, Gujar GT (2014) A common HPLC-PDA method for amino acid analysis in insects and plants. Indian J Exp Biol 52:73–79

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit S, Upadhyay SK, Singh H, Sidhu OP, Verma PC, Chandrasekhar K (2013) Enhanced methanol production in plants provides broad spectrum insect resistance. PLoS ONE 8:e79664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Sharma HC, Dhillon MK (2013) Bridging conventional and molecular genetics of sorghum insect resistance. In: Paterson AK (ed) Plant genetics and genomics: crops and models: genomics of the saccharinae.vol 11. Springer, New York, pp 367–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi MH, Van Emden HF (1992) Partial antibiosis to Rhopalosiphum padi in wheat and some phytochemical correlations. Ann Appl Biol 121:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar VK, Sharma HC, Reddy KD (2005) Antibiosis component of resistance to spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus in sorghum, Sorghum bicolor. Crop Prot 25:66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar BS, Walia S (2001) Prospects and problems of phytochemical biopesticides. In: Koul O, Dhaliwal GS (eds) Phytochemical biopesticides. Harvard Academic, Amsterdam, pp 133–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra JRP (2012) The evolution of artificial diets and their interactions in science and technology. In: Panizzi AR, Parra JRP (eds.) Insect bioecology and nutrition for integrated pest management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 52–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma HC (2009) Biotechnological approaches for pest management and ecological sustainability. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p. 526 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma HC, Agarwal RA (1983) Role of some chemical components and leaf hairs in varietal resistance in cotton to jassid, Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida. J Entomol Res 7:145–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma HC, Taneja SL, Leuschner K, Nwanze KF (1992) Techniques to screen Sorghum for resistance to insect pests. Information Bulletin No. 32. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India, 48 pp

  • Sharma HC, Taneja SL, Kameswara Rao N, Prasada Rao KE (2003) Evaluation of Sorghum germplasm for resistance to insect pests. Information Bulletin No. 63. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India, 177 pp

  • Sharma HC, Reddy BVS, Dhillon MK, Venkateswaran K, Singh BU, Pampapathy G, Folkertsma R, Hash CT, Sharma KK (2005) Host plant resistance to insects in sorghum: present status and need for future research. SAT eJournal 1(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma HC, Dhillon MK, Pampapathy G, Reddy BVS (2007) Inheritance of resistance to spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus in sorghum, Sorghum bicolor. Euphytica 156:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Jotwani MG (1980) Mechanisms of resistance to shoot fly. III. Biochemical basis of resistance. Indian J Entomol 42:551–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Sogawa K, Pathak MD (1970) Mechanisms of brown planthopper resistance of Mudgo variety of rice (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Appl Entomol Zool 5:145–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava PN, Auclair JL, Srivastava U (1983) Effect of non-essential amino-acids on phagostimulation and maintenance of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Can J Zool 61:2224–2229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vidyachandra B, Roy JK, Bhaskar D (1981) Chemical differences in rice varieties susceptible or resistant to gall midges and stem borers. Int Rice Res Newsl 6(2):7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibull J (1988) Resistance in the wild crop relatives Avena macrostachya and Hordeum bogdani to the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi. Entomol Exp Appl 48:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibull J (1994) Glutamic-acid content of phloem sap is not a good predictor of plant resistance to Rhopalosiphum padi. Phytochemistry 35:601–602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. H.C. Sharma, ICRISAT, India for supplying the seeds of test sorghum genotypes. The encouragement and providing necessary facilities by the Director, Joint Director (Research) and Head-Division of Entomology, and funding by ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhiis gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mukesh K. Dhillon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Heikki Hokkanen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhillon, M.K., Kumar, S. Amino acid profiling of Sorghum bicolor vis-à-vis Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) for biochemical interactions and plant resistance. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 11, 537–550 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-016-9491-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-016-9491-3

Keywords

Navigation