Abstract
Sea urchin (Paracentrotus lividus) fishery is intensively practiced in several areas of the Mediterranean basin. In Sardinia, as well as other Mediterranean countries, sea urchin is a basic ingredient for several dishes due to the delicacy of its gonads (roe), and demand is constantly increasing. Restrictions have been implemented in order to minimise the risk of overexploitation, however, these measures might jeopardize economic convenience in sea urchin harvesting. This paper estimates economic convenience within the edible sea urchin fishery in Sardinia. It aims to determine whether both profitability and sustainability, in terms of the preservation of sea urchin stock, can be guaranteed by actual policy regulation. We found high variability in terms of captures and profitability among firms, and a considerable degree of this variability is the result of technological differences between fishing methods. Analysis also suggests that a slight increase in allowed captures should generate a more than proportional increase in profits. This evidence gives some useful suggestions for improving the efficacy of policies in affecting the economic and environmental sustainability of the Mediterranean sea urchin fishery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes DKA, Crook AC (2001) Quantifying behavioral determinants of the coastal European sea-urchin Paracentrotus lividus. Mar Biol 138:1205–1212
Boudouresque CF, Verlaque M (2001) Ecology of Paracentrotus lividus. In: Lawrence JM (ed) Edible sea urchins: biology and ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 177–216
Carboni S, Addis P, Cau A, Atack T (2012) Aquaculture could enhance Mediterranean sea urchin fishery, expand supply. Glob Aquacult Advocate 15:44–45
Ceccherelli G, Pais A, Pinna S, Sechi N, Chessa LA (2011) Human impact on Paracentrotus lividus: the result of harvest restrictions and accessibility of locations. Mar Biol 158:845–852
Essington TE (2010) Ecological indicators display reduced variation in North American catch share fisheries. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010:754–759
European Commission (2000) Regional socio-economic studies on employment and the level of dependency in fishing. Final Report Lot. No. 23
European Commission (2001) Green paper on the future of the common fisheries policy. COM, Brussels, p 135
European Commission (2002) A community action plan for the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources in the Mediterranean Sea under the common fisheries policy. Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament. COM, Brussels, p 535
European Commission (2009) Green paper on reform of the common fisheries policy. COM, Brussels, p 163
Eythorsson E (1996) Coastal communities and ITQ management. The case of Icelandic Fisheries. Sociol Rural 36:212–223
Fernandez-Boan M, Fernandez L, Freire J (2012) History and management strategies of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus fishery in Galicia (NW Spain). Ocean Coast Manag 69:265–272
Frost H, Andersen P (2006) The common fisheries policy of the European Union and fisheries economics. Mar Policy 30:737–746
Furesi R, Madau FA, Palomba A, Pulina P (2014) Stated preferences for consumption of sea urchin: a choice experiment in Sardinia (Italy). Int J Food Syst Dyn 5(3):303–311
Garau G, Castaldi P, Deiana S, Campus P, Mazza A, Deiana P, Pais A (2012) Assessment of the use potential of edible sea urchins (Paracentrotus lividus) processing waste within the agricultural system: Influence on soil chemical and biological properties and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and wheat (Triticum vulgare) growth in an amended acidic soil. J Environ Manage 109:12–18
Gianguzza P, Chiantore M, Bonaviri C, Cattaneo-Vietti R, Vielmini I, Raggio S (2006) The effects of recreational Paracentrotus lividus fishing on distribution patterns of sea urchins at Ustica Island MPA (Western Mediterranean, Italy). Fish Res 81:37–44
Gordon H (1954) The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery. J Polit Econ 62:124–142
Grisolia JM, Lopez F, de Dios OJ (2012) Sea urchin: from plague to market opportunity. Food Qual Prefer 25:46–56
Guidetti P, Terlizzi A, Boero F (2004) Effects of the edible sea urchin, Paracentrotus lividus, Fishery along the Apulian rocky coast (SE Italy, Mediterranean Sea). Fish Res 66:287–297
Guidetti P, Bussotti S, Boero F (2005) Evaluating the effects of protection on fish predators and sea urchins in shallow artificial rocky habitats: a case study in the northern Adriatic Sea. Mar Environ Res 59:333–348
Kelly MS (2004) Sea urchin aquaculture: a review and outlook. In: Heinzeller T, Nebelsick JH (eds) Echinoderms: munchen. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 283–289
Khalilian S, Froese R, Proelss A, Requate T (2010) Designed for failure: a critique of the common fisheries policy of the European Union. Mar Policy 34:1178–1182
Lei Spano F (1977) Evoluzione storica dell’attività industriale agricola caccia e pesca in Sardegna. Cagliari S.T.E.F. S.p.A
Madau FA, Idda L, Pulina P (2009) Capacity and economic efficiency in small-scale fisheries: evidence from the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Policy 33:860–867
Markus T (2010) Towards sustainable fisheries subsidies: entering a new round of reform under the common fisheries policy. Mar Policy 34:1117–1124
Matsiori S, Aggelopoulos S, Tsoutsou A, Neofitou C, Soutsas K, Vafidis D (2012) Economic value of conservation. The case of the edible sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. J Environ Prot Ecol 13:269–274
Miyata T (2010) Reducing overgrazing by sea urchins by market development. Bull Fish Res Agency 32:103–107
Muraoka DD (1990) Managing the sea urchin fishery: an economic perspective. Nat Resour J 30:139–152
Nordic Council of Ministers (2009). Nordic experience of fisheries management. Seen in relation to the EU reform of the Common Fisheries Policy. Copenhagen Kailow Expres A/S
Pais A, Chessa LA, Serra S, Meloni G, Ruiu A, Manunza B (2006) Morphometric relationships and annual gonad index of the edible sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus from North western Sardinia. Biol Mar Mediterr 13:134–135
Pais A, Chessa LA, Serra S, Ruiu A, Meloni G, Donno Y (2007) The impact of commercial and recreational harvesting for Paracentrotus lividus on shallow rocky reef sea urchin communities in North-western Sardinia, Italy. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 73:589–597
Pais A, Serra S, Meloni G, Saba S, Ceccherelli G (2012) Harvesting effects on Paracentrotus lividus population structure: a case study from northwestern Sardinia, Italy, before and after the fishing season. J Coast Res 28:570–575
Régis BM (1986) Microstructure adaptative des radioles de Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) en milieu eutrophisé par des eaux usées. Mar Biol 90:271–278
Reynolds JA, Wilen JE (2000) The sea urchin fishery: harvesting, processing and the market. Mar Resour Econ 15:115–126
Surìs-Regueiro JC, Varela-Lafuente MM, Garza-Gil MD (2002) Profitability of the fishing fleet and structural aid in the European Union. Mar Policy 26:107–119
Trevisan G, Mauracher C (2002) The new common fisheries policy and protection of Mediterranean fishing. New Medit 4:10–17
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Furesi, R., Madau, F.A., Pulina, P. et al. Profitability and sustainability of edible sea urchin fishery in Sardinia (Italy). J Coast Conserv 20, 299–306 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-016-0441-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-016-0441-0