Abstract
We examined text memory in children with word reading deficits to determine how these difficulties impact representations of text meaning. We show that even though children with poor word decoding recall more central than peripheral information, they show a significantly bigger deficit relative to controls on central than on peripheral information. We call this the centrality deficit and argue that it is the consequence of insufficient cognitive resources for connecting ideas together due to these children’s resources being diverted from comprehension to word decoding. We investigated a possible compensatory mechanism for making these connections. Because a text representation is a synthesis of text information and a reader’s prior knowledge, we hypothesized that having knowledge of the passage topic might reduce or eliminate the centrality deficit. Our results support this knowledge compensation hypothesis: The centrality deficit was evident when poor readers did not have prior knowledge, but was eliminated when they did. This presents an exciting avenue to pursue for possible remediation of reading comprehension in children with word identification difficulties.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alba, J. W., Alexander, S. G., Hasher, L., & Caniglia, K. (1981). The role of context in the encoding of information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Learning and Memory, 7, 283–292. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.7.4.283.
Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1991). Effects of centrality on retrieval of text-based concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 932–939. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.5.932.
Barnes, M. A., & Dennis, M. (1996). Reading comprehension deficits arise from diverse sources: Evidence from readers with and without developmental brain pathology. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Processes and Intervention, pp. 251–278. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Barnes, M. A., Dennis, M., & Haefele-Kalvaitis, J. (1996). The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 216–241. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.0015.
Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Vermeulen, K., & Fulton, C. (2006). Paths to reading comprehension in at-risk second-grade readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(4), 334–351. doi:10.1177/00222194060390040701.
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9.
Britton, B. K., Meyer, B. J. F., Hodge, M. H., & Glynn, S. M. (1980). Effects of the organization of text on memory: Tests of retrieval and response criterion hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 6, 620–629.
Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1–8. doi:10.2307/1128873.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure. Reading and Writing, 11, 489–503. doi:10.1023/A:1008084120205.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 683–696. doi:10.1348/000709905X67610.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2007). Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective. New York: Guilford.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29, 850–859.
Chiesi, H. L., Spilich, G. J., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 257–273. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90146-4.
Cirilo, R. K., & Foss, D. J. (1980). Text structure and reading time for sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 96–109. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90560-5.
Curran, C. E., Kintsch, E., & Hedberg, N. (1996). Learning-disabled adolescents’ comprehension of naturalistic narratives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 494–507. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.494.
Curtis, M. E. (1980). Development of components of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 656–669. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.72.5.656.
Dunn, L. M., & Markwardt, F. C. (1970). Examiner’s manual: Peabody individual achievement test. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.
Espin, C. A., Cevasco, J., van den Broek, P., Baker, S., & Gersten, R. (2007). History as narrative: The nature and quality of historical understanding for students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 174–182. doi:10.1177/00222194070400020801.
Fletcher, C. R., & Bloom, C. P. (1988). Causal reasoning and comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 235–244. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90052-6.
Goetz, E. T., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., & Radin, D. I. (1983). Reading in perspective: What real cops and pretend burglars look for in a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 500–510. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.75.4.500.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371.
Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (1998). Facilitating knowledge-based inferences in less-skilled readers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 149–172. doi:10.1006/ceps.1997.0968.
Hansen, C. L. (1978). Story retelling used with average and learning disabled readers as a measure of reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, 62–69. doi:10.2307/1510938.
Kamalski, J., Sanders, T., & Lentz, L. (2008). Coherence marking, prior knowledge, and comprehension of informative and persuasive texts: Sorting things out. Discourse Processes, 45(4), 323–345. doi:10.1080/01638530802145486.
Kamhi, A. (2007). Knowledge deficits: The true crisis in education. The ASHA Leader, 12, 28–29.
Keenan, J. M., & Brown, P. (1984). Children’s reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in a text. Child Development, 55, 1556–1569. doi:10.2307/1130026.
Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300. doi:10.1080/10888430802132279.
Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., Wadsworth, S. J., DeFries, J. C., & Olson, R. K. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on reading and listening comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 79–91. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00293.x.
Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kintsch, W., & Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257–274. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90036-4.
Kintsch, W., Kozminsky, E., Streby, W. J., McKoon, G., & Keenan, J. M. (1975). Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 196–214. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80065-X.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363.
Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2001). Qualitative Reading Inventory–3. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1456–1470. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1456.
Lyon, G. R. (1995). Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of dyslexia, 45, 3–27. doi:10.1007/BF02648210.
Meyer, B.J.F. (1974). The organization of prose and its effect on recall. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Nation, K. (2005). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties. In M. J. Snowing & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 248–265). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Nation, K., Clarke, P., & Snowling, M. (2002). General cognitive ability in children with reading comprehension difficulties. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4), 549–560. doi:10.1348/00070990260377604.
Oakhill, J. (1994). Individual differences in children’s text comprehension. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, pp. 821–848. San Diego: Academic.
Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443–468. doi:10.1080/01690960344000008.
O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1987). The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text. Memory & Cognition, 15, 419–427.
Olson, R. K. (2006). Genes, environment, and dyslexia: The 2005 Norman Geschwind memorial lecture. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 205–238.
Olson, R. K., Forsberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues, pp. 243–277. Baltimore: Brookes.
Paris, S. G., & Stahl, S. A. (2005). Children’s reading comprehension and assessment. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recht, D. R., & Leslie, L. (1988). Effect of prior knowledge on good and poor readers’ memory of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 16–20. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.1.16.
Samuelstuen, M. S., & Braten, I. (2005). Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 107–117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00441.x.
Shankweiler, D. (1989). How problems of comprehension are related to difficulties in decoding. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Shankweiler, D. (1999). Words to meanings. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 113–127. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0302_2.
Shapiro, A. M. (2004). How including prior knowledge as a subject variable can change outcomes of learning research. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 159–189. doi:10.3102/00028312041001159.
Smiley, S. S., Oakley, D. D., Worthen, D., Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1977). Recall of thematically relevant material by adolescent good and poor readers as function of written versus oral presentation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 381–387. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.69.4.381.
Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia. Malden: Blackwell.
Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275–290. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90155-5.
Swanson, H. L., & Alexander, J. (1997). Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 128–158. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.128.
Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55–64. doi:10.1207/SLDRP1501_6.
Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595–611. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90048-8.
Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 12, 1–25.
van den Broek, P. (1988). The effects of causal relations and hierarchical position on the importance of story statements. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 1–22. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90045-9.
van den Broek, P., & Trabasso, T. (1986). Causal networks versus goal hierarchies in summarizing text. Discourse Processes, 9, 1–15.
van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading, pp. 71–98. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Weschler, D. (1974). Examiner’s manual: Weschler’s intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
Winograd, P. N. (1984). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 404–425. doi:10.2307/747913.
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca: Riverside.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from NIH HD27802 to the Colorado Learning Disabilities Research Center, for which J. Keenan is a co-PI. These data were presented at The Memory and Text Comprehension Meeting, Montpellier, France, 2006, and at the 2006 and 2007 meetings of Society for the Scientific Study of Reading. We thank Rebecca Betjemann, Sarah Priebe, and Laura Roth for discussions of the data, all the participants and their families, and all the testers and scorers.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, A.C., Keenan, J.M. How word decoding skill impacts text memory: The centrality deficit and how domain knowledge can compensate. Ann. of Dyslexia 59, 99–113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0025-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0025-x