Abstract
The emergence of multimodality imaging of pericardial diseases has improved diagnosis and management. In acute pericarditis, echocardiography is the first-line test, but cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may be beneficial in patients who fail to respond to therapy. An increased T2 short-tau inversion recovery time (STIR) suggests pericardial edema, and increased late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) suggests organizing pericarditis. Computed tomography (CT) can be helpful in procedural planning, either to guide percutaneous drainage of an effusion or to assess calcification and the location of vascular structures before pericardiectomy. On echocardiography, a respiratory septal shift in combination with either a preserved medial e′ velocity or prominent expiratory diastolic hepatic vein flow reversal performs well in diagnosing constrictive pericarditis. These patients also have decreased regional longitudinal strain in the anterolateral and right ventricular free walls, presumably related to pericardial to myocardial tethering. Finally, prominent LGE may identify patients with constrictive pericarditis who improve with anti-inflammatory therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance•• Of major importance
Troughton RW, Asher CR, Klein AL. Pericarditis. Lancet. 2004;363:717–27.
Imazio M, Trinchero R, Shabetai R. Pathogenesis, management, and prevention of recurrent pericarditis. J Cardiovasc Med. 2007;8:404–10.
Klein AL, Abbara S, Agler DA, et al. American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease. Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:965–1012. This guideline document provides a comprehensive overview of pericardial anatomy and pathophysiology while also outlining the pertinent imaging findings in pericardial diseases.
Welch TD, Ling LH, Espinosa RE, et al. Echocardiographic diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis: Mayo Clinic criteria. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:526–34. This single center study provides a hierarchical approach to multiple parametric testing in the echocardiographic diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. Respiration-related ventricular septal shift, coupled with either preserved medial mitral e’ velocity or prominent hepatic vein diastolic flow reversals, performed best at diagnosing constrictive pericarditis.
Sengupta PP, Krishnamoorthy VK, Abhayaratna WP, et al. Disparate patterns of left ventricular mechanics differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2008;1:29–38.
Kusunose K, Dahiya A, Popovic ZB, et al. Biventricular mechanics in constrictive pericarditis comparison with restrictive cardiomyopathy and impact of pericardiectomy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:399–406. This study showed that pericardial to myocardial tethering in constrictive pericarditis results in decreased anterolateral and right ventricular free wall global longitudinal strain. After pericardiectomy, systolic strain in these regions improved.
Feng D, Glockner J, Kim K, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging pericardial late gadolinium enhancement and elevated inflammatory markers can predict the reversibility of constrictive pericarditis after antiinflammatory medical therapy: a pilot study. Circulation. 2011;124:1830–7. This pilot study demonstrated that pericardial LGE could distinguish reversible versus persistent constrictive pericarditis. Reversible pericarditis was associated with increased LGE, and these patients may resolve with anti-inflammatory treatment.
Lange RA, Hillis LD. Acute pericarditis. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2195–202.
Maisch B, Seferović PM, Ristić AD, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: executive summary. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:587–610.
Dudzinski DM, Mak GS, Hung JW. Pericardial diseases. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2012;37:75–118.
2011 Appropriate use criteria for echocardiography: ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/ SCCT/SCMR. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:229–67.
Spodick DH. Acute pericarditis: current concepts and practice. JAMA. 2003;289:1150–3.
Imazio M, Spodick DH, Brucato A, et al. Controversial issues in the management of pericardial diseases. Circulation. 2010;121:916–28.
Seferović PM, Ristić AD, Maksimović R, et al. Pericardial syndromes: an update after the ESC guidelines 2004. Heart Fail Rev. 2013;18:255–66.
Salisbury AC, Olalla-Gómez C, Rihal CS, et al. Frequency and predictors of urgent coronary angiography in patients with acute pericarditis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:11–5.
Hall WB, Truitt SG, Scheunemann LP, et al. The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1961–5.
O'Leary SM, Williams PL, Williams MP, et al. Imaging the pericardium: appearances on ECG-gated 64-detector row cardiac computed tomography. Br J Radiol. 2010;83:194–205.
Oyama N, Oyama N, Komuro K, et al. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the pericardium: anatomy and pathology. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2004;3:145–52.
Yared K, Baggish AL, Picard MH, et al. Multimodality imaging of pericardial diseases. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2010;3:650–60.
Wince WB, Kim RJ. Molecular imaging: T2-weighted CMR of the area at risk—a risky business? Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:547–9.
Eitel I, Friedrich MG. T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute cardiac disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13:13.
Young PM, Glockner JF, Williamson EE, et al. MR imaging findings in 76 consecutive surgically proven cases of pericardial disease with CT and pathologic correlation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:1099–109.
Zurick AO, Bolen MA, Kwon DH, Tan CD, et al. Pericardial delayed hyperenhancement with CMR imaging in patients with constrictive pericarditis undergoing surgical pericardiectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2011;4:1180–91. This paper demonstrated histological correlation of pericardial LGE. In patients with constrictive pericarditis, increased LGE was associated with organizing pericarditis whereas no LGE correlated with pericardial fibrosis and calcification.
Imazio M, Bobbio M, Cecchi E, et al. Colchicine in addition to conventional therapy for acute pericarditis: results of the COlchicine for acute PEricarditis (COPE) trial. Circulation. 2005;112:2012–6.
Shabetai R. Recurrent pericarditis: recent advances and remaining questions. Circulation. 2005;112:1921–3.
Imazio M, Bobbio M, Cecchi E, et al. Colchicine as first-choice therapy for recurrent pericarditis: results of the CORE (COlchicine for REcurrent pericarditis) trial. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1987–91.
Imazio M, Brucato A, Cemin R, et al. Colchicine for recurrent pericarditis (CORP) a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:409–14. This randomize trial expanded upon previous work that demonstrated the safety and efficacy of colchicine in acute and after a first episode of recurrent pericarditis. The authors showed that colchicine is also effective for secondary prevention of recurrent pericarditis.
Galve E, Garcia-Del-Castillo H, Evangelista A, et al. Pericardial effusion in the course of myocardial infarction: incidence, natural history, and clinical relevance. Circulation. 1986;73:294–9.
Weitzman LB, Tinker WP, Kronzon I, et al. The incidence and natural history of pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery: an echocardiographic study. Circulation. 1984;69:506–11.
Bogaert J, Francone M. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pericardial diseases. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009;11:14.
Bogaert J, Centonze M, Vanneste R, et al. Cardiac and pericardial abnormalities on chest computed tomography: what can we see? Radiol Med. 2010;115:175–90.
Reddy PS, Curtiss EI, O'Toole JD, et al. Cardiac tamponade: hemodynamic observations in man. Circulation. 1978;58:265–72.
Gillam LD, Guyer DE, Gibson TC, et al. Hydrodynamic compression of the right atrium: a new echocardiographic sign of cardiac tamponade. Circulation. 1983;68:294–301.
Rifkin RD, Pandian NG, Funai JT, et al. Sensitivity of right atrial collapse and right ventricular diastolic collapse in the diagnosis of graded cardiac tamponade. Am J Noninvasive Cardiol. 1987;1:73–80.
Leeman DE, Levine MJ, Come PC. Doppler echocardiography in cardiac tamponade: exaggerated respiratory variation in transvalvular blood flow velocity integrals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:572–8.
Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL. Cardiac tamponade and pericardial effusion: respiratory variation in transvalvular flow velocities studied by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:1020–30.
Ling LH, Oh JK, Schaff HV, et al. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era : evolving clinical spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy. Circulation. 1999;100:1380–6.
Bertog SC, Thambidorai SK, Parakh K, et al. Constrictive pericarditis: etiology and cause-specific survival after pericardiectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1445–52.
Oh JK, Hatle LK, Seward JB, et al. Diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography in constrictive pericarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:154–62.
Hatle LK, Appleton CP, Popp RL. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation. 1989;79:357–70.
Garcia MJ, Rodriguez L, Ares M, et al. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy: assessment of left ventricular diastolic velocities in longitudinal axis by Doppler tissue imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:108–14.
Reuss CS, Wilansky SM, Lester SJ, et al. Using mitral “annulus reversus” to diagnose constrictive pericarditis. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:372–5.
Choi JH, Choi JO, Ryu DR, et al. Mitral and tricuspid annular velocities in constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: correlation with pericardial thickness on computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;4:567–75.
Kamdar AR, Meadows TA, Roselli EE, et al. Multidetector computed tomographic angiography in planning of reoperative cardiothoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1239–45.
Talreja DR, Edwards WD, Danielson GK, et al. Constrictive pericarditis in 26 patients with histologically normal pericardial thickness. Circulation. 2003;108:1853–7.
Thavendiranathan P, Verhaert D, Walls MC, et al. Simultaneous right and left heart real-time, free-breathing CMR flow quantification identifies constrictive physiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;5:15–24. In this small study of patients undergoing real-time phase contrast CMR, respiratory variation greater than 25% across the mitral valve identified patients with constrictive pericarditis.
Francone M, Dymarkowski S, Kalantzi M, et al. Assessment of ventricular coupling with real-time cine MRI and its value to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Eur Radiol. 2005;16:944–51.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Paul C. Cremer declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Deborah H. Kwon has received consulting fees from Astellas.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Pericardial Disease
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cremer, P.C., Kwon, D.H. Multimodality Imaging of Pericardial Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep 17, 24 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-015-0577-9
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-015-0577-9