Abstract
Upper digestive feeding intolerance, as evidenced by high gastric residual volume and vomiting, is the most common complication among hospitalized patients receiving enteral nutrition. These patients are at high risk of developing aspiration pneumonia, which in turn is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality. Most episodes of aspiration are small in volume and do not lead to pneumonia. The likelihood of pneumonia increases with multiple aspirations. Pneumonia is also more common in critically ill patients who have bacterial colonization of the oropharynx. Gastric residual volume is commonly used as a means to assess aspiration risk during tube feeding. However, recent studies have demonstrated that this measurement has limited sensitivity. The approach to minimizing the frequency of aspiration during tube feeding involves assessment of the patient’s degree of risk and initiation of appropriate measures directed at risk reduction.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
Heyland D, Cook DJ, Winder B, et al.: Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a prospective survey. Crit Care Med 1995, 23:1055–1060.
Montejo JC: Enteral nutrition-related gastrointestinal complications in critically ill patients: a multicenter study. Crit Care Med 1999, 27:1447–1453.
Mentec H, Dupont H, Bocchetti M, et al.: Upper digestive intolerance during enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: frequency, risk factors, and complications. Crit Care Med 2001, 29:1955–1961.
Zaloga GP: Aspiration-related illnesses: definitions and diagnosis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002, 26:S2–S8.
Mullan H, Roubenoff RA, Roubenoff R: Risk of pulmonary aspiration among patients receiving enteral nutrition support. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1992, 16:160–164.
Esparza J, Moivin MA, Hartshorne MF, Levy H: Equal aspiration rates in gastrically and transpylorically fed critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2001, 27:660–664.
Metheny NA, Clouse RE, Chang YH, et al.: Tracheobrochial aspiration of gastric contents in critically ill tube-fed patients: frequency, outcomes, and risk factors. Crit Care Med 2006, 34:1007–1015.
McClave SA, Lukan JK, Stefater JA, et al.: Poor validity of residual volumes as a marker for risk of aspiration in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2005, 33:324–330.
Hilker R, Poetter C, Findeisen N, et al.: Nosocomial pneumonia after acute stroke: implications for neurological intensive care medicine. Stroke 2003, 34:975–981.
Dziewas R, Schilling M, Konrad C, et al.: Pneumonia in acute stroke patients fed by nasogastric tube. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2004, 75:852–856.
Marik PE: Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2001, 344:665–671.
Cendrero JAC, Solel-Violan J, Benitiz AB, et al.: Role of different routes of tracheal colonization in the development of pneumonia in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest 1999, 116:462–470.
Thomas S, Raman R, Idikula J, Brahmadathan N: Alterations in oropharyngeal flora in patients with a nasogastric tube: a cohort study. Crit Care Med 1992, 20:1677–1680.
Bert F, Lambert-Zechovsky N: Sinusitis in mechanically ventilated patients and its role in the pathogenesis of nosocomial pneumonia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1996, 15:533–544.
Heyland D, Mandell LA: Gastric colonization by gramnegative bacilli and nosocomial pneumonia in the intensive care unit: evidence for causation. Chest 1992, 101:187–193.
Pingleton SK, Hinthorn DR, Liu C: Enteral nutrition in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Multiple sources of tracheal colonization include the stomach. Am J Med 1986, 80:827–832.
McClave SA, DeMeo MT, DeLegge MH, et al.: North American Summit on aspiration in the critically ill patient: consensus statement. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002, 26:S80–S85.
Nind G, Chen WH, Protheroe R, et al.: Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Gastroenterology 2005, 128:600–606.
Gomes GF, Pisani JC, Macedo ED, Campos AC: The nasogastric feeding tube as a risk factor for aspiration and aspiration pneumonia. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2003, 6:327–333.
Ferrer M, Torsten TB, Torres A, Hernandez C, Piera C: Effect of nasogastric tube size on gastroesophageal reflux and microaspiration in intubated patients. Ann Intern Med 1999, 130:991–994.
Dotson RG, Robinson RG, Pingleton SK: Gastroesophageal reflux with nasogastric tubes. Effect of nasogastric tube size. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994, 149:1659–1662.
Noviski N, Yehuda YB, Serour F, et al.: Does the size of nasogastric tubes affect gastroesophageal reflux in children? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999, 29:448–451.
Baeten C, Hoefnagels J: Feeding via nasogastric tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. A comparison. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1992, 194:95–98.
Fay DE, Poplausky M, Gruber M, Lance P: Long-term enteral feeding: a retrospective comparison of delivery via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasoenteric tubes. Am J Gastroenterol 1991, 86:1604–1609.
Corke C: Gastric emptying in the critically ill patient. Crit Care Resusc 1999, 1:39–44.
Reintam A, Parm P, Redlich U, et al.: Gastrointestinal failure in intensive care: a retrospective clinical study in three different intensive care units in Germany and Estonia. BMC Gastroenterol 2006, 6:19–26.
Drakulovic MB, Torres A, Bauer TT, et al.: Supine body position as a risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999, 354:1851–1858.
Maloney JP, Ryan TA: Detection of aspiration in enterally fed patients: a requiem for bedside monitors of aspiration. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002, 26:S34–S42.
Metheny NA, Dahms TE, Chang YH, et al.: Detection of pepsin in tracheal secretions after forced small-volume aspirations of gastric juice. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2004, 28:79–84.
Chang WK, McClave SA, Hsieh CB, Chao YC: Gastric residual volume (GRV) and gastric contents measurement by refractometry. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2007, 31:63–68.
Parrish CR, McCray S: Enteral feeding: dispelling myths. Pract Gastroenterol 2003:XXVII:33–50.
A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors and The Clinical Guidelines Task Force: Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002, 26:33SA–35SA.
Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drower JW, et al.: Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2003, 27:355–373.
Booth CM, Heyland DK, Paterson WG: Gastrointestinal promotility drugs in the critical care setting: a systematic review of the evidence. Crit Care Med 2002, 30:1429–1435.
Tack J, Peeters T: What comes after macrolides and other motilin stimulants? Gut 2001, 49:317–318.
Yavagal D, Karnad D, Oak JL: Metoclopramide for preventing pneumonia in critically ill patients receiving enteral tube feeding: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2000, 28:1408–1411.
Kreymann KG, Berger MM, Deutz NEP, et al.: ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr 2006, 25:210–223.
Meissner W, Dohrn B, Reinhart K: Enteral naloxone reduces gastric tube reflux and frequency of pneumonia in critical care patients during opioid analgesia. Crit Care Med 2003, 31:776–780.
Marik PE, Zaloga GP: Gastric versus post-pyloric feeding: a systematic review. Crit Care 2003, 7:R46–R51.
Ho KM, Dobb GJ, Webb SR: A comparison of early gastric and post pyloric feeding in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2006, 32:639–649.
Mazuski JE, Taylor B: Gastric versus intestinal feedings: does it make a difference? Critical Connections, Society of Critical Care Medicine, February 2007. Available at http://www.sccm.org/SCCM/Publications. Accessed June 11, 2007.
Van Citters GW, Lin HC: Ileal brake: neuropeptidergic control of intestinal transit. Curr Gastrenterol Rep 2006, 8:367–373.
Bonten MJ, Gaillard CA, can Tiel FH, et al.: Continuous enteral feeding counteracts preventive measures for gastric colonization in intensive care patients. Crit Care Med 1994, 22:939–944.
Spilker GA, Hinthorn DR, Pingleton SK: Internittent enteral feeding in mechanically ventilated patients: the effect on gastric pH and gastric cultures. Chest 1996, 110:243–248.
Heyland DK, Cook DJ, Schoenfeld PS, et al.: The effect of acidified enteral feeds on gastric colonization in critically ill patients: results of a multicenter randomized trial. Crit Care Med 1999, 27:2399–2406.
Mehall JR, Saltzman DA, Jackson RJ, Smith SD: Acidification of formula with citric acid is equally effective and better tolerated than acidification with hydrochloric acid. Crit Care Med 2002, 30:1701–1704.
de Jonge E, Schultz MJ, Spanjaard L, et al.: Effects of selective decontamination of digestive tract on mortality and acquisition of resistant bacteria in intensive care: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003, 362:1011–1016.
Koeman M, van der Ven AJ, Hak E, et al.: Oral decontamination with chlorhexidine reduces the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2006, 173:1348–1355.
Gujadhur R, Helme BW, Sanni A, Dunning J: Continuous subglottic suction is effective for prevention of ventilator associated pneumonia. Interact Cardiovasc Thoracic Surg 2005, 4:110–115.
Li Bassi GL, Curto F, Zanellla A, et al.: A 72-hour study to test the efficacy and safety of the “Mucus Slurper” in mechanically ventilated sheep. Crit Care Med 2007, 35:906–911.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mizock, B.A. Risk of aspiration in patients on enteral nutrition: Frequency, relevance, relation to pneumonia, risk factors, and strategies for risk reduction. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 9, 338–344 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-007-0039-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-007-0039-7