Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Patient-Provider Relationship in Chronic Pain

  • Psychiatric Management of Pain (MR Clark, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Pain and Headache Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between patient and provider has long been the subject of study within the psychotherapy literature, with the available data suggesting a modest, but reliable, association between the strength of this relationship and treatment outcome. Conversely, there has been little work focused on the patient–provider relationship in chronic pain settings despite the complexities and difficulties that are often involved in this area. This review provides a brief, broad overview of the literature on the patient–provider relationship and identifies key aspects that are specifically relevant to chronic pain settings. In addition to reviewing the literature in this area, a series of recommendations for future clinical and academic work are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. • Norcross JC, Lambert MJ. Psychotherapy relationships that work II. Psychother 2011;48:4–8. This is the introduction to a special issue on the patient–provider relationship in psychotherapy. The article provides an overview of the area and, in addition to the rest of the articles within the issue, specifies aspects of the relationship that are reliably related to outcomes.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mumford E, Schlesinger HJ, Glass GV. The effect of psychological intervention on recovery from surgery and heart attacks: an analysis of the literature. Am J Public Health. 1982;72:141–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jamison RN. Nonspecific treatment effects in pain medicine. Pain Clinical Updates. 2011;9:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, et al. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Family Practice. 1998;47:213–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Makoul G. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med. 2001;76:390–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wasan AD, Wootton J, Jamison RN. Dealing with difficult patients in your pain practice. Region Anesth Pain Med. 2005;30:184–92.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burns JW, Higdon LJ, Mullen JT, Lansky D, Wei JM. Relationships among patient hostility, anger expression, depression, and the working alliance in a work hardening program. Ann Beh Med. 1999;21:77–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers CR. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. J Consult Psychol. 1957;21:95–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Horvath AO, Symonds BD. Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Couns Psychol. 1991;38:149–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. J Consulting Clin Psych. 2000;68:438–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Horvath AO, Del Re AC, Flückiger C, Symonds D. Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychother. 2011;48:9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen J. Psych Bull. 1992;112:155–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Burlingame GM, McClendon DT, Alonso J. Cohesion in group therapy. Psychother. 2011;48:34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elliott R, Bohart AC, Watson JC, Greenberg LS. Empathy. Psychother. 2011;48:43–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Farber B, Doolin EM. Positive regard. Psychother. 2011;48:58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kolden GG, Klein MH, Wang C-C, Austin SB. Congruence/genuineness. Psychother. 2011;48:65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grencavage LM, Norcross JC. Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors? Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1990;21:372–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Myers S. Empathic listening: reports on the experience of being heard. J Humanist Psychol. 2000;40:148–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis M, Morley S, van der Windt DAWM, et al. Measuring practitioner/therapist effects in randomised trials of low back pain and neck pain interventions in primary care settings. Eur J Pain. 2010;14:1033–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Williams ACDC, Potts HWW. Group membership and staff turnover affect outcomes in group CBT for persistent pain. Pain. 2010;148:481–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. De Ruddere L, Goubert L, Prkachin KM, et al. When you dislike patients, pain is taken less seriously. Pain. 2011;152:2342–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gulbrandsen P, Madsen HB, Benth JS, Laerum E. Health care providers communicate less well with patients with chronic low back pain: a study of encounters at a back pain clinic in Denmark. Pain. 2010;150:458–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tryon GS, Winograd G. Goal consensus and collaboration. Psychother. 2011;48:50–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Frantsve LME, Kerns RD. Patient-provider interactions in the management of chronic pain: current findings within the context of shared medical decision making. Pain Med. 2007;8:25–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hirsh AT, Atchison JW, Berger JJ, et al. Patient satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain: predictors and relationship to compliance. Clin J Pain. 2005;21:302–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith MY, Winkel G, Egert J, Diaz-Wionczek M, DuHamel KN. Patient-physician communication in the context of persistent pain: validation of a modified version of the Patients’ Perceived Involvement in Care Scale. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2006;32:71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Thorne FM, Morley S. Prospective judgments of acceptable outcomes for pain, interference and activity: patient-determined outcome criteria. Pain. 2009;144:262–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Robinson ME, Brown JL, George SZ, et al. Multidimensional success criteria and expectations for treatment of chronic pain: the patient perspective. Pain Med. 2005;6:336–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dobkin PL, Sita A, Sewitch MJ. Predictors of adherence to treatment in women with fibromyalgia. Clin J Pain;22:286–94.

  30. Baker SC, Gallois C, Driedger SM, Santesso N. Communication accommodation and managing musculoskeletal disorders: doctors’ and patients’ perspectives. Health Commun. 2011;26:379–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Benner DE. Who can help me? A chronic pain patient’s view of multidisciplinary treatment. In: Schatman M, Campbell M, editors. Chronic pain management: guidelines for multidisciplinary program development. New York: Informa; 2007. p. 117–28.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vowles KE, Robinson ME. Progressing towards acceptable treatment outcomes. Pain. 2009;144:228–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Norcross JC, Wampold BE. Evidence-based therapy relationships: research conclusions and clinical practices. Psychother. 2011;48:98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Leila NM, Pirkko H, Eeva P, Eija K, Reino P. Training medical students to manage a chronic pain patient: both knowledge and communication skills are needed. Eur J Pain. 2006;10:167–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Baldwin SA, Wampold BE, Imel ZE. Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance. J Cons Consulting Psych. 2007;75:842–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. New York: Guilford; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vong SK, Cheing GL, Chan F, So EM, Chan CC. Motivational enhancement therapy in addition to physical therapy improves motivational factors and treatment outcomes in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2011;92:176–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Revicki D, et al. Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain. Pain. 2008;137:276–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Beale M, Cella M, Williams ACDC. Comparing patients’ and clinician-researchers’ outcome choice for psychological treatment of chronic pain. Pain. 2011;152:2283–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. •• Morley S. Efficacy and effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic pain: progress and some challenges. Pain 2011;152:S99–S106. This is a review and commentary on the progressive developments within cognitive and behavioral approaches to chronic pain. It also identifies areas in need of further work and challenges to be addressed.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Thompson M, McCracken LM. Acceptance and related processes in adjustment to chronic pain. Curr Pain Headache R. 2011;15:144–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vowles KE, McCracken LM, O’Brien JZ. Acceptance and values-based action in chronic pain: a three-year follow-up analysis of treatment effectiveness and process. Beh Res Ther. 2011;49:748–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hayes SC, Strosahl K, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kohlenberg RJ, Tsai M. Functional analytic psychotherapy: creating intense and curative therapeutic relationships. New York: Springer; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Linehan M. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  46. • Hayes SC, Villatte M, Levin M, Hildebrandt M. Open, aware, and active: contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annu Rev Clin Psych 2011;7:141–68. This is a comprehensive review of the emerging contextual approaches that includes both a conceptual overview and empirical review.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pierson H, Hayes S. Using acceptance and commitment therapy to empower the therapeutic relationship. In: Gilbert P, Leahy RL, editors. The therapeutic relationship in the cognitive behavioral psychotherapies. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2007. p. 205–28.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lambert MJ, Shimokawa K. Collecting client feedback. Psychother. 2011;48:72–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Interdisciplinary Musculoskeletal Pain Assessment and Community Treatment Service, The Haywood Hospital, High Lane, Burslem, ST6 7AG, UK

    Kevin E. Vowles

  2. Centre for Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK

    Kevin E. Vowles

  3. Institute of Management Studies, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London, SE14 6NW, UK

    Miles Thompson

Authors
  1. Kevin E. Vowles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miles Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin E. Vowles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vowles, K.E., Thompson, M. The Patient-Provider Relationship in Chronic Pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 16, 133–138 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-012-0244-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-012-0244-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation