Opinion statement
Investigation of the complex biochemical pathways that underlie heart failure (HF) has led to the recognition of multiple molecular markers that may help to characterize patients with this disease. Although a myriad of novel biomarkers are being studied, most attention continues to be focused on the natriuretic peptides, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-Terminal-proBNP (NT-proBNP). Numerous studies have established a role for these hormones in HF diagnosis and prognostication. More contentious has been their role in helping to guide HF management on a routine basis. This article aims to update the body of evidence surrounding conventional HF biomarkers and to highlight some emerging evidence on the use of novel markers. We believe that in select patients there may be a role for monitoring and cautious interpretation of HF biomarker levels to facilitate diagnosis, prognostication, and optimization of tailored therapy. However, there are not yet convincing data to suggest that routine hormone monitoring should be applied broadly and algorithmically to all HF patients. Moreover, to the extent that they are measured, HF biomarkers should serve only as a complement to—never as a substitute for—sound clinical judgment, watchful follow-up, and reliance on expert consultation when necessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circ. 2011;123(4):e18–e209.
Ross JS, Chen J, Lin Z, et al. Recent national trends in readmission rates after heart failure hospitalization. Circ Heart Fail. 2010;3:97–103.
Medscape Reference on Heart Failure. Available at http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/163062-overview#a0156. Accessed May 2011.
NACB LMPG Committee Members, Myers GL, Christenson RH, Cushman M, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice guidelines: emerging biomarkers for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Clin Chem. 2009;55(2):378–84.
Januzzi Jr JL, Camargo CA, Anwaruddin S, et al. The N-terminal pro-BNP investigation of dyspnea in the emergency department (PRIDE) study. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(8):948–54.
Fonarow GC, Peacock WF, Phillips CO, et al. Admission B-type natriuretic peptide levels and in- hospital mortality in acute decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(19):1943–50.
Behnes M, Breukmann M, Ahmad-Nejad P, et al. Diagnostic performance and cost effectiveness of measurements of plasma N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide in patients presenting with acute dyspnea or peripheral edema. Intl J Card. 2009;135:165–74.
Moe GW, Howlett J, Januzzi J, et al. N-Terminal pro-B-type atriuretic peptide testing improves the management of patients with suspected acute heart failure: Primary results of the Canadian prospective randomized multicenter IMPROVE-CHF study. Circ. 2007;115:3103–10.
Jessup M, Abraham WT, Casey DE, et al. 2009 Focused Update: ACCF/AHA guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines developed in collaboration with the international society for heart and lung transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(15):1343–82.
Doust JA, Pietrzak E, Dobson A, et al. How well does B-type natriuretic peptide predict death and cardiac events in patients with heart failure: systematic review. BMJ. 2005;330:625.
Bettencourt P, Azevedo A, Pimenta J, et al. N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide predicts outcome after hospital discharge in heart failure patients. Circ. 2004;110:2168–74.
Cohen-Solal A, Logeart D, Huang B, et al. Lowered B-type natriuretic peptide in response to levosimendan or dobutamine treatment is associated with improved survival in patients with severe acutely decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:2343–8.
Michtalik H, Hsin-Chieh Y, Campbell CY, et al. Acute changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide during hospitalization and risk of readmission and mortality in patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:1191–5.
Felker GM. Admission, discharge, or change in BNP and long-term mortality: Data from OPTIMIZE-HF linked with Medicare claims. Presented at the Heart Failure Society of America 2010 Scientific Meeting. San Diego, CA; September 14, 2010.
Kim H, Januzzi JL. Biomarkers in the management of heart failure. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 2010;12:519–31.
Shah MR. STARBRITE: A randomized pilot trial of BNP-guided therapy in patients with advanced heart failure. Circ. 2006;114:II_528.
Jourdain P, Jondeau G, Funck F, et al. Plama brain natriuretic peptide-guided therapy to improve outcome in heart failure: The STARS-BNP Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1733–9.
Pfisterer M, Buser P, Rickli H, et al. BNP-guided versus symptom-guided heart failure therapy: The trial of intensified versus standard medical therapy in elderly patients with congestive heart failure (TIME-CHF) randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;301(4):383–92.
Lainchbury JG, Troughton RW, Strangman KM, et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide-guided treatment for chronic heart failure: Results from the BATTLESCARRED trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:53–60.
Eurlings LWM, van Pol PEJ, Kok WE, et al. Management of chronic heart failure guided by individual N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide targets: Results of the PRIMA (Can pro-brain-natriuretic peptide guided therapy of chronic heart failure improve heart failure morbidity and mortality?) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:2090–100.
Berger R, Moertl D, Peter S, et al. N-Terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide–guided, intensive patient management in addition to multidisciplinary care in chronic heart failure: A 3-arm, prospective, randomized pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:645–53.
Persson H, Erntell H, Eriksson B, et al. Improved pharmacological therapy of chronic heart failure in primary care: a randomized study of NT-proBNP guided management of heart failure—SIGNAL-HF (Swedish Intervention study—Guidelines and NT-proBNP AnaLysis in Heart Failure). Eur J of Heart Fail. 2010;12:1300–8.
Januzzi J. Benefits of natriuretic peptide guided heart failure therapy for patients with chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: Primary Results of the pro-BNP outpatient tailored chronic heart failure therapy (PROTECT) study. Presented at the American Heart Association 2010 scientific sessions. Chicago, IL; November 15, 2010. Presented at the 2010 American Heart Association meeting, PROTECT demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular events among HF patients receiving hormone-guided therapy.
Schou M, et al. NT-proBNP stratified long-term follow-up in outpatient heart failure clinics: A prospective randomized multicenter trial in the Danish heart failure clinics network. Presented at ACC. New Orleans, LA; April 5, 2011. Presented at the 2011 American College of Cardiology meeting, NorthStar was the largest multicenter trial of NT-proBNP–guided therapy to date, finding no significant benefit to a hormone-guided strategy over and above strategies guided by clinical assessment alone.
Missov E, Calzolari C, Pau B. (1997) Circulating cardiac troponin I in severe congestive heart failure. Circ. 1997;96:2953–8.
Bass A, Patterson JH, Adams KF. Perspective on the clinical application of troponin in heart failure and states of cardiac injury. Heart Fail Rev. 2010;15:305–17.
Fonarow GC, Peacock WF, Horwich TB, et al. Usefulness of B-type natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponin levels to predict in-hospital mortality from ADHERE. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:231–7.
Kawahara C, Tsutamoto T, Nishiyama K, et al. Prognostic role of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circ J. 2011;75:656–61.
Kubo T, Kitaoka H, Okawa M, et al. Combined measurements of cardiac troponin I and brain natriuretic peptide are sseful for predicting adverse outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ J. 2011;75:919–26.
Ghali JK, Anand IS, Abraham WT, et al. Randomized double-blind trial of darbopoeitin alfa in patients with symptomatic heart failure and anemia. Circ. 2008;117:526–35.
Belonje AMS, Voors AA, van der Meer P, et al. Endogenous erythropoietin and heart failure. Circ. 2010;121:245–51.
Kazory A. Emergence of blood urea nitrogen as a biomarker of neurohormonal activation in heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:694–700.
Gotsman I, Zwas D, Planer D, et al. The significance of serum urea and renal function in patients with heart failure. Medicine. 2010;89:197–203.
Testani JM, Cappola TP, Brensinger CM, et al. Interaction between loop diuretic-associated mortality and blood urea nitrogen concentration in chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:375–82.
Maisell A, Mueller C, Nowak R, et al. Mid-region pro-hormone markers for diagnosis and prognosis in acute dyspnea. Results from the BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2062–76.
Maisell A, Mueller C, Nowak R, et al. Midregion prohormone adrenomedullin and prognosis in patients presenting with acute dyspnea. Results from the BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1057–67.
Voors AA, von Haehling S, Anker SD, et al. C-terminal provasopressin (copeptin) is a strong prognostic marker in patients with heart failure after an acute myocardial infarction: results from the OPTIMAAL study. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:1187–94.
Neuhold S, Huelsmann M, Strunk G, et al. Comparison of copeptin, B-type natriuretic peptide, and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:266–72.
Van Kimmenade RR, Januzzi Jr JL, Ellinor PT, et al. Utility of amino-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, galectin-3, and apelin for the evaluation of patients with acute heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1217–24.
Lok DJA, van der Meer P. Bruggink-André de la Porte PW, et al.: Prognostic value of galectin-3, a novel marker of fibrosis, in patients with chronic heart failure: data from the DEAL-HF study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010;99:323–8.
De Boer R, Lok DJA, Jaarsma R, et al. Predictive value of plasma galectin-3 levels in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Ann Med 2011;43:60–68.
Ky B, French B, McCloskey K, et al. High-sensitivity ST2 for prediction of adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2011;4(2):180–7.
Alvelos M, Lourenco P, Dias C, et al. Prognostic value of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in acute heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2011, [Epub ahead of print].
Takahashi R, Negishi K, Watanabe A, et al. Serum syndecan-4 is a novel biomarker for patients with chronic heart failure. J Cardiol 2011.
Disclosure
No conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlendorf, K.H., Kasper, E.K. Use of Novel and Conventional Biomarkers for Management of Patients With Heart Failure. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med 13, 475–488 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-011-0150-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-011-0150-9