Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A cybernetic theory of morality and moral autonomy

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human morality may be thought of as a negative feedback cotrol system in which moral rules are reference values, and moral disapproval, blame, and punishment are forms of negative feedback given for violations of the moral rules. In such a system, if moral agents held each other accountable, moral norms would be enforced effectively. However, even a properly functioning social negative feedback system could not explain acts in which individual agents uphold moral rules in the face of contrary social pressure. Dr. Frances Kelsey, who withheld FDA approval for thalidomide against intense social pressure, is an example of the degree of individual moral autonomy possible in a hostile environment. Such extreme moral autonomy is possible only if there is internal, psychological negative feedback, in addition to external, social feedback. Such a cybernetic model of morality and moral autonomy is consistent with certain aspects of classical ethical theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kekes, J. (2000) The enforcement of morality, American Philosophical Quarterly 37(1): 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pritchard, M.S. (1998) Professional responsibility: Focusing on the exemplary, Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2): 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spier, R.E. (1996) Editorial — Ethics as a control system component, Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3): 259–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coleman, J. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis, F.L. (1992) Applied Optimal Control and Estimation, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., Bigelow, J. (1943) Behavior, purpose, and teleology, Philosophy of Science 10: 18–24. Reprinted in Buckley, W. (1968) Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago, IL, USA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wiener, N. (1964) God and Golem: A Comment on Certain Points where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richardson, G.P. (1991) Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harnden-Warwick, D. (1997) Psychological realism, morality, and chimpanzees, Zygon 32 (1): 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De Waal, F. (1982) Chimpanzee Politics, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aristotle. (1985). Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Terence Irwin, Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis, IN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kant, Immanuel. (1959) The Foundations of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. Lewis White Beck. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Green, M.K. (1992) Kant and moral self-deception. Kant-Studien 83 (2): 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. James, M. (undated — Accessed 14 August 2000) Frances Kelsey: Invalidating thalidomide for prenatal use. Canadian Government World Wide Web Archives. http://collections.ic.gc.ca/heirloom_series/volume6/218–219.htm.

  15. Burkholz, H. (1997) Giving thalidomide a second chance, FDA Consumer 31 (6): 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Chambers Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chambers, J. A cybernetic theory of morality and moral autonomy. SCI ENG ETHICS 7, 177–192 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0039-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0039-1

Keywords

Navigation