Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding moral responsibility in the design of trailers

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper starts from the presupposition that moral codes often do not suffice to make agents understand their moral responsibility. We will illustrate this statement with a concrete example of engineers who design a truck’s trailer and who do not think traffic safety is part of their responsibility. This opinion clashes with a common supposition that designers in fact should do all that is in their power to ensure safety in traffic. In our opinion this shows the need for a moral philosophy that helps engineers to interpret their responsibility and think more critically about it. For this purpose we will explore the moral philosophy of Alasdair MacIntyre, which is particularly interesting because he locates the beginning of moral thinking in the daily practice of a profession. This is consistent with the history of moral codes, for codes are also the product of moral reflection by professionals. We will use MacIntyre’s philosophy to (1) explain what is wrong with the designers’ understanding of their responsibility and (2) show a possible way to bring their reflection to a more self-critical level. We will also inspect MacIntyre’s proposal critically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. www.krone.de.

  2. Central Bureau of Statistics and SWOV, www.swov.nl.

  3. see www.dodehoek.nl and European Directive 2003/97/EG accessible http://europa.eu.int/eurlex/en/index.html.

  4. Davis, M. (1998) Thinking Like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Didier, C. (2000) Engineering ethics at the Catholic university of Lille (France): research and teaching in a European context. European Journal of Engineering Education 25(4): 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. See http://www.bouwenmetstaal.nl/.

  7. MacIntyre, A.C. (1981), After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. van Gorp, Ethical issues in engineering design. This thesis will appear July 2005. The trailer case described in this article is one of four cases from this thesis.

  9. See www.cur.nl.

  10. www.ieee.org.

  11. www.abet.org.

  12. www.onlineethics.org.

  13. www.lockheedmartin.com, www.bp.com, www.whirlpool.com, www.dow.com.

  14. Frazer, E. and Lacey, N. (1994) MacIntyre, Feminism and the concept of practice. in: Horton, J. and Mendus S. eds. After MacIntyre; Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Polity Press, Cambridge and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor, Ch. (1994) Justice after virtue in: Horton, J. and Mendus S. eds. After MacIntyre; Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Polity Press, Cambridge and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  16. MacIntyre, A.C. (1994) in: Horton, J. and Mendus S. eds. After MacIntyre; critical perspectives on the work of Alasdair. Polity Press, Cambridge Oxford p.286–290

    Google Scholar 

  17. Williams, B. (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  18. MacIntyre, A.C. (1990) Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopedia, Geneology and Tradition. Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  19. MacIntyre, A.C. (1999) Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone van der Burg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Burg, S., van Gorp, A. Understanding moral responsibility in the design of trailers. SCI ENG ETHICS 11, 235–256 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0044-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0044-x

Keywords

Navigation