Abstract
Computer aided technologies (CAT) are becoming an indispensable instrument to design, improve and manufacture new products and services. Digital human modelling (DHM) systems allow to simulate the Human-artifact interface and to evaluate, in early step of design process, the ergonomic performances of new products or workplaces. In particular, for products that have to be used in a “constrained” workplace, different tasks and activities are associated with different postures. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of anthropometric characteristics and expectations on the postural comfort perception through the CAT/DHM systems, while using four office devices: desktop computer, laptop computer, tablet and smartphone. A statistical sample of healthy students was selected and their anthropometric characteristics were measured. The postures assumed by the participants were gathered in a not-invasive way by cameras. The angular detection was performed directly on snapshots by using Kinovea® software. Human joints’ an-gles were used for the virtual-postural analysis, through DELMIA® software. The evaluation of postural comfort was obtained in two ways: CaMAN® software developed by the researchers from the Department of Industrial Engineering in Salerno (Italy) was used to calculate the objective comfort indexes while an appropriate questionnaire, given to subjects during the devices usage, was used to evaluate the subjective com-fort indexes. The results of analyses show a difference between subjective and objective postural comfort indexes for all the devices: this difference has been associated to the expectations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Naddeo, A.: Towards predicting the (dis)comfort performance by modelling: methods and findings. Ph.D. Dissertation, TU-Delft Repository. (2017). https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:ac8ebee1-278c-484d-acc0-d39c765c1ac2
Naddeo, A.: Comfort-driven target setting. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Comfort Congress (ICC2017) Salerno Alessandro Naddeo vol. 1, pp. 376–391. ISBN:979-12-200-2249-1 (2017)
Mejía-Gutiérrez, R., Fischer, X., Bennis, F.: virtual knowledge modelling for distributed teams: towards an interactive design approach. Int. J. Netw. Virtual Org. 5(2), 166–189 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijnvo.2008.017009
Vink, P., Hallbeck, S.: Editorial: comfort and discomfort studies demonstrate the need for a new model. Appl. Ergon. 43, 271–276 (2012)
Berkhouta, A.L., Hendriksson-Larsen, K., Bongersb, P.: The effect of using a laptop station compared to using a standard laptop PC on the cervical spine torque, perceived strain and productivity. Appl. Ergon. 35, 147–152 (2004)
Workineh, S.A., Yamaura, H.: Multi-position ergonomic computer workstation design to increase comfort of computer work. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 53, 1–9 (2016)
Asundi, K., Odell, D., Luce, A., Dennerlein, J.T.: Changes in posture through the use of simple inclines with notebook computers placed on a standard desk. Appl. Ergon. 43, 400–407 (2012)
Gold, J.E., Driban, J.B., Yingling, V.R., Komaroff, E.: Characterization of posture and comfort in laptop users in non-desk settings. Appl. Ergon. 43, 392–399 (2012)
Straker, L., Jones, K.J., Miller, J.: A comparison of the postures assumed when using laptop computers and desktop computers. Appl. Ergon. 28, 263–268 (1997)
Kim, J.H., Aulck, L., Bartha, M.C., Harper, C.A., Johnson, P.W.: Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, comfort, and typing performance among virtual, notebook, and desktop keyboards. Appl. Ergon. 45, 1406–1413 (2014)
Todisco, V., Clemente, V., Califano, R., Vallone, M.: The effect of wearing eyeglasses upon postural comfort perception while using multi-tasking electronic devices in sitting position. Adv Intell Syst Comput (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41685-4_49
Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., Vallone, M., Califano, R.: New trend line of research about comfort evaluation: proposal of a framework for weighing and evaluating contributes coming from cognitive, postural and physiologic comfort perceptions. In: Vink, P. (ed) Advances in Social and Organizational Factors.“Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics” Conference 2014, ISBN: 978-1-4951-2102-9 (2014)
Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., Califano, R., Vallone, M.: The role of expectation in comfort perception: the mattresses’ evaluation experience. Proc. Manuf. 3, 4784–4791 (2015)
Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., D’Oria, C.: Proposal of a new quantitative method for postural comfort evaluation. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 48, 25–35 (2015)
Badr, A.A., El-Nahrawy, A.: Moisture properties of raised 3-thread fleece fabric knitted with different face and fleecy yarns. Alex. Eng. J. 55(3), 2881–2892 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.06.021. (ISSN 1110-0168)
Vallone, M., Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., Califano, R.: Comfort driven redesign methods: an application to mattresses production systems. Open Mech. Eng. J. 9, 492–507 (2015)
Di Pardo, M., Riccio, A., Sessa, F., Naddeo, A., Talamo, L.: Methodology development for ergonomic analysis of work-cells in virtual environment. SAE Tech. Pap. (2008). https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-1481
Naddeo, A., Vallone, M., Cappetti, N., Califano, R., Di Napoli, F.: Ergonomic-driven redesign of existing work cells: the “Oerlikon friction system” case. Lect. Notes Mech. Eng. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45781-9_120
Bassi, C., Naddeo, F., Pulignano, C., Senatore, B., Tarantino, D.: How to analyze and improve a supermarket cashier’s work cycle. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 11(20), 10358–10366 (2016)
Califano, R., Cozzitorto, P., Delmastro, M., de Vito, C., Sellitto, G., Vallone, M.: Virtual ergonomic analysis and redesign methods: an application to lunch payment station at university of Salerno. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 11(10), 7114–7118 (2016)
Maradei, M.F., Quintana, L., Castellanos-Olarte, J.M.: Assessment of biomechanical demands and discomfort in drivers to stablish design criteria for truck seats. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 10(4), 431–437 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-016-0325-4.1
Naddeo, A., Barba, S., Ferrero, F.I.F.: Propuesta de un nuevo método no invasivo para el análisis postural con aplicaciones de fotogrametría 4d. XI Congreso Ibero-Americano de Ingegnieria Mecanica (CIBIM2013), 11–14, La Plata, Argentina (2013)
Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., Califano, R., Vallone, M.: Manual assembly workstation redesign based on a new quantitative method for postural comfort evaluation. Appl. Mech. Mater. 459, 368–379 (2013)
Apostolico, A., Cappetti, N., D’Oria, C., Naddeo, A., Sestri, M.: Postural comfort evaluation: experimental identification of range of rest posture for human articular joints. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-013-0186-z
Naddeo, A., Apicella, M., Galluzzi, D.: Comfort-driven design of car interiors: a method to trace iso-comfort surfaces for positioning the dashboard commands. SAE Tech. Pap. 8, 8–9 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1394
Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., Ippolito, O.: Dashboard reachability and usability tests: a cheap and effective method for drivers’ comfort rating. SAE Tech. Pap. (2014). https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0455
Naddeo, A., Califano, R., Vink, P.: The effect of posture, pressure and load distribution on (dis)comfort perceived by students seated on school chairs. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 12(4), 1179–1188 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0479-3
Elhelw, M.: Analysis of energy management for heating, ventilating and air-conditioning systems. Alex. Eng. J. 55(2), 811–818 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.01.034. (ISSN 1110-0168)
Groenesteijn, L., Vink, P., de Looze, M., Krause, F.: Effects of differences in office chair controls, seat and backrest angle design in relation to tasks. Appl. Ergon. 40(3), 362–370 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.11.011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Califano, R., Naddeo, A., Gatto, A. et al. Virtual prototyping for workplace analysis: the effect of expectation on perceived comfort while using office devices. Int J Interact Des Manuf 13, 235–242 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0521-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0521-5