Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Paleoimaging: a review of applications and challenges

  • Review
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the contributions and current practices of paleoimaging modalities as applied to the bioarchaeological research setting. The paper provides a brief historical perspective regarding imaging approaches in this unique context and a description of various modalities including photography, 3D surface scanning, aerial imaging, LiDAR, GPR, portable radiography, endoscopy, X-ray fluorescence, and advanced medical imaging. The paper presents a review of issues and applications of paleoimaging with an emphasis on specific research questions. A description of the limitations and challenges for paleoimaging within the bioarchaeological construct follows and offers support for the multimodal approach to paleoimaging. Interpretation of imaging data by consensus including paleoimagers, medical scientists and bioarchaeologists is addressed. The paper concludes with a look to the future of paleoimaging from an applications and standards development perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin DL, Harrod RP, Perez VR. Bioarchaeology: an integrated approach to working with human remains. New York: Springer; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Lynnerup N. Medical imaging of mummies and bog bodies, a mini-review. Gerontology. 2010;56:441–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rühli FJ, Chhem RK, Böni T. Diagnostic paleoradiology of mummified tissue: interpretation and pitfalls. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2004;55(4):218–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards E. Anthropology and photography, 1860–1920. London: Royal Anthropological Institute; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Collier J, Collier M. Visual anthropology: photography as a research method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beckett RG, Conlogue GJ. Paleoimaging: field applications for cultural remains and artifacts. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lewin PK, Harwood-Nash DC. Computerized axial tomography in medical archaeology. Paleopathol Newsl. 1977;17:8–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tapp E, Stanworth P, Wildsmith K. The endoscope in mummy research. In: David R, Tapp E, editors. Evidence embalmed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1984. p. 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beckett R, Conlogue GJ. Video enhanced fiberoptic examination of skeletal material and artifacts with radiographic correlation. Paleopath Newsl supplement. 1998;102:6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beckett RG, Guillen S. Field videoendoscopy—a pilot project at Centro Mallqui, El Algarrobal, Peru. Paleopath Newsl Suppl. 2000;110:14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Notman DNH. Use of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of archaeological specimens. Paleopath Newsl. 1983;24:9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Conlogue G, Beckett R, Posh J, Bailey Y, Henderson D, Double G, King T. Paleoimaging: the use of radiography, magnetic resonance and endoscopy to examine mummified remains. J Rad Nurs. 2008;27(1):5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Conlogue G, Beckett R, Posh J. Computer based imaging. In: Beckett RG, Conlogue GJ, editors. Paleoimaging: field applications for cultural remains and artifacts. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2010. p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Öhrström LM, von Waldburg H, Speier P, Bock M, Suri RS, Ruhli FJ. Scenes from the past: MR imaging versus CT of ancient Peruvian and Egyptian mummified tissues. RadioGraphics. 2013;33(1):291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rowlands S, Sarris A. Detection of exposed and subsurface archaeological remains using multi-sensor remote sensing. J Archaeol Sci. 2006;34:795–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lasaponara R, Masini N. Satellite remote sensing in archaeology: past, present and future perspective. J Archaeol Sci. 2011;38:1995–2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chase AF, Chase DZ, Weishampel JF, Drake JB, Shrestha RL, Slatton KC, Awe JJ, Carter WE. Airborne LiDAR archaeology, and the ancient Maya landscape at Coracol, Belize. J Archaeol Sci. 2011;38:328–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Corns A, Shaw R. High resolution 3-dimensional documentation of archaeological monuments and landscapes using airborne LiDAR. J Cult Herit. 2009;10:72–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao W, Forte E, Pipan M, Tian G. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) attribute analysis for archaeological prospection. J Appl Geophys. 2013;97:107–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuzminsky SC, Gardiner MS. Three-dimensional laser scanning: potential uses for museum conservation and scientific research. J Archaeol Sci. 2012;39:2744–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cavka M, Petaros A, Boscic D, Kavur L, Jankovic I, Despot R, Trajkovic J, Brkljacic B. CT-guided endoscopic recovery of a foreign object from the cranial cavity of an ancient Egyptian mummy. RadioGraphics. 2012;32:2151–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith MJ, Kneller P, Elliott D, Young C, Masnley H, Oddelton D. Multidisciplinary analysis of a mummified cranium claimed to be that of an execution victim. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2012;4:74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Conlogue G, Nelson A, Guillén S. The application of radiography to field studies in physical anthropology. JACR. 2004;55(4):254–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gardner JC, Garvin G, Nelson AJ, Vascotto G, Conlogue G. Paleoradiology in mummy studies: the Sulman Mummy Project. JACR. 2004;55(4):228–34.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Beckett RG, McNamee M, Monge J. Endoscopic evidence of lymphadenopathy in a mummified Peruvian woman from Pachacamac. Paleopath Newsl Suppl. 1999;106:9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Beckett RG, Conlogue G, Colton R. Endoscopic evaluation of segmented sternum with radiographic correlation in a Peruvian infant: implications for aging of the individual. Paleopath Newsl Suppl. 1999;106:23.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Seiler R, Spielman AI, Zink A, Ruhli F. Oral pathologies of the Neolithic Iceman, c.3300BC. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013;121:137–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Beckett RG, Nelson AJ. Mummy restoration project among the Anga of Papua New Guinea. Anat Rec. 2014 (in press).

  29. Conlogue G. Considered limitations and possible applications of computed tomography in mummy research. Anat Rec. 2014 (in press).

  30. Wanek J, Szekely G, Ruhli F. X-ray absorption-based imaging and its limitations in the differentiation of ancient mummified tissue. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:595–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Donnino R, Jacobs JE, Doshi JV, Hecht EM, Kim DC, Babb JS, et al. Dual-source versus single-source cardiac CT angiography: comparison of diagnostic image quality. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1051–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Conlogue G, Beckett R, Bravo A, Taylor J, Horne R, Wade R, Cartmell L, Schmiedl U, Jones J, Stanley G, Haskell NH, Aufderheildi A, Engel L, Smith MO, Cambell A, Bucher A, Walbaum S. Entertaining mummies: embalming for the sideshow. J Biol Res. 2005;80:290–5.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schmidt C, Harbort J, Knecht R, Grzyska U, Muenscher A, Dalchow CV. Measurement and comparison of labyrinthine structures with the digital volume tomography: ancient Egyptian mummies’ versus today’s temporal bones. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270:831–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Brier B, Wade RS. Surgical procedures during ancient Egyptian mummification. Chungara. 2001;33:117–23.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wade AD, Conlogue GJ, Beckett R, Gonzalez R, Wade RS, Brier B. MUMAB: a conversation with the past. Anat Rec. 2014 (in press).

  36. Conlogue G, Blyth T, Li J, Beckett R. A comparison of conventional or plane radiography versus computerized radiography in paleoimaging applications. Yearb Mummy Stud. 2011;1:33–6.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Beckett R, Nelson A, Conlogue G, Ordones MP. Paleoimaging and bioanthropological analysis of pre-Inca mummies from the Maranga culture; a reconstruction of lives. National Geographic Expeditions Council Final Report (EC#0577-12). 2013; archived.

  38. Wade DW, Conlogue GJ. Forensic considerations for preprocessing effects on clinical MDCT scans. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58:797–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wanek J, Speller R, Ruhli FJ. Direct action of radiation on mummified cells: modeling of computed tomography by Monte Carlo algorithms. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2013;52:397–410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wade AD, Nelson AJ, Garvin GJ. A synthetic radiologoical study of brain treatment in ancient Egyptian mummies. HOMO. 2011;62:248–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wade AD, Nelson AJ. Radiological evaluation of the evisceration tradition in ancient Egyptian mummies. HOMO. 2013;64:1–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Panzer S, Borumandi F, Wanek J, Papageorgopoulou C, Shved N, Colacicco G, Ruhli FJ. Modeling ancient Egyptian embalming: radiological assessment of experimentally mummified human tissue by CT and MR. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:1527–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Davey J, Stewart ME, Drummer OH. The value of CT imaging of Horus in determining the method of mummification and the sex of the mummy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013;57:657–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Villa C, Hansen MN, Buckberry J, Cattaneo C, Lynnerup N. Forensic age estimation based on the trabecular bone changes of the pelvic bone using post-mortem CT. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;233:393–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bollinger SA, Ross S, Thali MJ, Hostettler B, Menkveld-Gfeller U. Scenes from the past: initial investigation of early Jurassic vertebrate fossils with multidetector CT. RadioGraphics. 2012;32:1553–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Richardson D, Guillen S, Beckett R, Kyle W, Conlogue G, Harper-Beckett K. Archaeohelminthology of the Chiribaya Shepard, Canis familiaris (700-1467 A.D.) from Southern Peru. J Comp Parasitol. 2012;70:133–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wade AD, Ikram S, Conlogue GJ, Beckett R, Nelson AJ, Colten R, Lawson B, Tampieri D. Foodstuff placement in ibis mummies and the role of viscera in embalming. J Archeol Sci. 2012;30:1642–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Willmon R, Coqueugnoit H, Holowka S, Dutour O, Pfeiffer S. Fibrous dyspasia of the temporal bone: a case from the Glen Williams Ossuary, Ontario, Canada. Int J Paleopathol. 2013;3:269–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Darton Y, Richard I, Truc MC. Osteomyelitis variolosa: a probable medieval case combined with unilateral sacrilitis. Int J Paleopathol. 2013;3:288–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Klaus H, Ericksen C. Paleopathology of an ovarian teratome: description and diagnosis of an exotic abdominal bone and tooth mass in a historic Peruvian burial. Int J Paleopathol. 2013;3:294–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cavka M, Petaros A, Ivanac G, Aganovic L, Jankovic I, Reiter G, Speier P, Nielles-Vallespin S, Brkljacic B. A probable case of Hand–Schueller–Christian’s disease in an Egyptian mummy revealed by CT and MR investigation of a dry mummy. Coll Anthropol. 2012;1:281–6.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Harris JE, Weeks KR. X-raying the pharaohs. Princeton: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Papagrigoraks MJ, Karamesinis KG, Daliouris KP, Kousoulis AA, Syndinos PN, Hatziantoniou MD. Paleopathological findings in radiographs of ancient and modern Greek skulls. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41:1605–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Thompson RC, Allam AH, Lombardi GP, Wann LS, Sutherland ML, et al. Atherosclerosis across 4000 years of human history: the Horus study of four ancient populations. Lancet. 2013;381:1211–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cockburn A, Cockburn E, Reyman TA. Mummies, disease and ancient cultures. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wade AD, Nelson AJ. Evisceration and excerebration in Egyptian mummification tradition. J Archaeol Sci. 2013;40:4198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Chhem RK. Paleoradiology: imaging disease in mummies and ancient skeletons. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:803–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Chhem RK, Brothwell DR. Paleoradiology: imaging mummies and fossils. New York: Springer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge Gerald Conlogue and the Bioanthropology Research Institute at Quinnipiac University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Professor Emeritus, Biomedical Sciences, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT, USA

    Ronald G. Beckett

  2. College of Health Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA

    Ronald G. Beckett

  3. Bioanthropology Research Institute, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT, USA

    Ronald G. Beckett

  4. Department of Physical Anthropology, Museum of Man, San Diego, CA, USA

    Ronald G. Beckett

  5. Visiting Faculty/Scholar, Arizona Museum, University of Arizona, 8775 N. Maya Ct., Tucson, AZ, 85742, USA

    Ronald G. Beckett

  6. National Geographic Explorer, Washington, DC, USA

    Ronald G. Beckett

Authors
  1. Ronald G. Beckett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald G. Beckett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beckett, R.G. Paleoimaging: a review of applications and challenges. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 10, 423–436 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9541-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9541-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation