Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Forensic odontology and dental age estimation research: a scoping review a decade after the NAS report on strengthening forensic science

  • Review
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dental age estimation (DAE) is one of the most reliable and useful scientific methods employed by forensic odontology (FO) for human identification. In 2009, the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report highlighted the need to deepen research in many disciplines, among which FO received strong criticism for specific expertise. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview in order to systematically map the latest original research done in FO, as well as identify DAE within this field. A systematic search was performed from 2014 to 2019. In total, 644 studies were identified for qualitative analysis: DAE was the most studied topic (41.30%). Asia was the most productive continent with 58.27% of the global production on DAE; India was the most productive Asian country, with 32.33% and 55.48% of global and Asian production, respectively. The University of Macerata (Italy), KU Leuven (Belgium), University of Split (Croatia), and University of São Paulo (Brazil) led DAE research. Authors from leading countries on DAE research demonstrated great individual productivity, which is evidence of their scientific efforts, but also possible risks if the continuity of this line of research depends on them. Although FO has significantly focused its research on DAE, the absence of publications on controversial topics but necessary for research according to the NAS report shows the possible lack of interest of authors or journals to address them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community, National Research Council. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 2009.

  2. Shah P, Velani PR, Lakade L, Dukle S. Teeth in forensics: a review. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30(2):291–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_9_17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. INTERPOL. Disaster victim identification guide. 2018. https://www.interpol.int/en/content/download/621/file/FS-02_2018-03_EN_DVI.pdf?inLanguage=eng-GB. Accessed 13 April 2022.

  4. Adserias-Garriga J. Evolution of methods and state-of-the-art in dental age estimation. In: Adserias-Garriga J, editor. Age estimation: a multidisciplinary approach. San Diego: Elsevier. 2019.

  5. De Donno A, Angrisani C, Mele F, Introna F, Santoro V. Dental age estimation: Demirjian’s versus the other methods in different populations. A literature review. Med Sci Law. 2021;61(1_suppl):125–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802420934253

  6. Sengupta N, Sarode SC, Sarode GS, Gadbail AR, Gondivkar S, Patil S, Patil S. Analysis of 100 most cited articles on forensic odontology. Saudi Dent J. 2020;32(7):321–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Han MQ, Jia SX, Wang CX, Chu G, Chen T, Zhou H, Guo YC. Accuracy of the Demirjian, Willems and Nolla methods for dental age estimation in a northern Chinese population. Arch Oral Biol. 2020;118: 104875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104875.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beecher-Monas E. Reality bites: the illusion of science in bite-mark evidence. Cardozo Law Rev. 2009;30(4):1369–410.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deitch A. An inconvenient tooth: forensic odontology is an inadmissible junk science when it is used to match teeth to bitemarks in skin. Wisconsin L Rev. 2009;5:1205–36.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dailey JC, Golden GS, Senn DR, Wright FD. Bitemarks. In: Senn DR, Weems RA, editors. ASFO manual of forensic odontology, 5th edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 2013.

  11. Bush MA, Delattre VF. Science and forensic odontology. In: Senn DR, Weems RA, editors. ASFO manual of forensic odontology, 5th edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2013.

  12. Edwards HT. 10 year anniversary of the Landmark Report on Forensic Evidence. https://www.innocenceproject.org/judge-edwards-nas-statement/. Accessed 13 April 2022.

  13. Roux C, Talbot-Wright B, Robertson J, Crispino F, Ribaux O. The end of the (forensic science) world as we know it? The example of trace evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370(1674). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0260.

  14. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73; https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850

  15. Yoo I, Mosa AS. Analysis of PubMed user sessions using a full-day PubMed query log: a comparison of experienced and nonexperienced PubMed users. JMIR Med Inform. 2015;3(3): e25. https://doi.org/10.2196/medinform.3740.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Acharya AB. Teaching forensic odontology: an opinion on its content and format*. Eur J Dent Educ. 2006;10(3):137–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00405.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mânica S, Gorza L. Forensic odontology in the 21st century - Identifying the opinions of those behind the teaching. J Forensic Leg Med. 2019;64:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. American Board of Forensic Odontology (ABFO). www.abfo.org. Accessed 13 April 2022.

  19. International Organization for Forensic Odonto-Stomatology (IOFOS). http://www.iofos.eu. Accessed 13 April 2022.

  20. Kaye DH. The good, the bad, the ugly: the NAS report on strengthening forensic science in America. Sci Justice. 2010;50(1):8–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2010.01.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McAndrew WP, Houck MM. Interpol review of forensic science management literature 2016–2019. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020;2:382–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ballou SM. The NAS report: ten years of response. J Forensic Sci. 2019;64(1):6–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones AW. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;165(2–3):115–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pretty IA, Sweet DJ. The judicial view of bitemarks within the United States Criminal Justice System. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2006;24(1):1–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barsley RE, Pitluch HM. United states jurisprudence. In: David TJ, Lewis JM, editors. Forensic Odontology: Principles and Practice. San Diego: Academic Press. 2018.

  26. Pretty IA. Reliability of bitemark analysis. In: Dorion RBJ, editor. Bitemark evidence: A color atlas and text. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2011. p. 591–2.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bowers CM. Review of a forensic pseudoscience: identification of criminals from bitemark patterns. J Forensic Leg Med. 2019;61:34–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2018.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Papadopoulos CK, Bouzala A, Stavrianos C, Stavrianou P. Trends in forensic odontology publications: 2000–2015. Int J Forensic Odontol. 2018;3:12–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brown KA. Forensic aspects of community dentistry. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1986;15(3):414–7. Abstract.

  30. IOFOS. Quality assurance in forensic odonto-stomatology. http://www.iofos.eu/?page_id=831. Accessed 13 April 2022.

  31. Roux C, Willis S, Weyermann C. Shifting forensic science focus from means to purpose: a path forward for the discipline? Sci Justice. 2021;61(6):678–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2021.08.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ubelaker DH. International advances in identification of human remains. In: Latham KE, Bartelink EJ, Finnegan M, editors. New perspectives in forensic human skeletal identification. San Diego: Academic Press. 2018.

  33. International Organization for Migration (IOM). World Migration Report 2020. https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2020.pdf. Accessed 13 April 2022.

  34. Bradley T. Global perspectives on violence against women and girls. London: Zed Books Ltd; 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Bernitz H. The challenges and effects of globalisation on forensic dentistry. Int Dent J. 2009;59(4):222–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brkić H. Forensic science: 20 years of forensic dentistry at the University of Zagreb, 1994 – 2014. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2014;48(2):96–8.

  37. Kathane P, Singh A, Gaur JR, Krishan K. The development, status and future of forensics in India. Forensic Sci Int: Reports. 2021;3: 100215.

    Google Scholar 

  38. National Forensic Sciences University. About our University. https://www.nfsu.ac.in. Accessed 13 April 2022.

  39. Acharya AB. Reflections on setting up forensic odontology department, its activities, and faculty. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2019;11(3):167–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.285791.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vaswani V, Ahmed MN. Forensic anthropology education and training in India. Med Sci Law. 2020;60(1):83–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802419879003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fonseca GM, Ortiz-Contreras J, Ramírez-Lagos C, López-Lázaro S. Lip print identification: current perspectives. J Forensic Leg Med. 2019;65:32–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.04.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Shamim T. Publications trends in the journal of forensic dental sciences 2009–2012. J Scientometric Res. 2013;2(2):152–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rajesh KR, Shanker KR. Forensic odontology: is India emerging as a potential contributor to literature? J Punj Acad Forensic Med Toxicol. 2018;18(2):30–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Perini T, Ribeirete E, Franco A, Gabardo G, Maciel JVB, Fernandes A. Quantifying the scientific studies in forensic dentistry presented at meetings of the “Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica” (SBPqO) between 2013 and 2018. Rev Bras Odontol Leg. 2019;6(2):41–9.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dietrichkeit Pereira JG, Frontanilla Recalde TS, Barreto Costa P, Jacometti V, Vigorito Magalhães L, Alves Da Silva RH. Forensic odontology education: from undergraduate to PhD–a Brazilian experience. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2017;35(2): 641 149–56.

  46. Demir E, Yaşar E, Özkoçak V, Yıldırım E. The evolution of the field of legal medicine: a holistic investigation of global outputs with bibliometric analysis. J Forensic Leg Med. 2020;69: 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vidal-Parra M, Fonseca GM. Registros ortodóncicos para la identificación forense: una revisión exploratoria [Orthodontic records for forensic identification: a scoping review]. REML. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reml.2021.08.002.Inpress.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. de A Romero M, Kronka Mülfarth RC. University of São Paulo: sustainability masterplan for policies, plans, goals and actions. In: Leal Filho W, Azeiteiro U, Alves F, Molthan-Hill P, editors. Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education. World Sustainability Series. Cham: Springer. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47877-7_34

  49. Wade MJ, Furrer UB. The peer reviewed technical literature and the litigation process. Environ Forensics. 2018;19(4):225–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2018.1519743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Stavrianos C, Mastagas D, Stavrianou I, Karaiskou O. Dental age estimation of adults: a review of methods and principals. Res J Med Sci. 2008;2(5):258–68.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jones AW. Which articles and which topics in the forensic sciences are most highly cited? Sci Justice. 2005;45(4):175–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(05)71661-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Teitelbaum J. An improved forensic science information search. Forensic Sci Rev. 2015;27(1):41–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Becker WS. Forensic science in transition: critical leadership challenges. Forensic Sci Policy Manag: Int J. 2010;1:214–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409044.2010.508507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Houck MM, McAndrew WP, Porter M, Davies B. A review of forensic science management literature. Forensic Sci Rev. 2015;27(1):53–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ballantyne KN, Wilson-Wilde L. Assessing the reliability and validity of forensic science–an industry perspective. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2020;52(3):275–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2019.1711182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Leary T, Ashman J. Narcissistic leadership: Important considerations and practical implications. ILJ. 2018;10(2):62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Klein J. Connecting with and developing employees for real leadership. ILJ. 2018;10(2):85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Fonseca GM. Forensic dentistry: far beyond Netflix. J Forensic Leg Med. 2020;74: 102032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2020.102032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Oliva JD, Beety VE. Discovering forensic fraud, Nw UL Rev 2017; 112:121–138. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/nulr/vol112/iss1/5. Accessed 13 April 2022.

  60. Barsley RE, Bernstein ML, Brumit PC, Dorion RBJ, Golden GS, Lewis JM, McDowell JD, Metcalf RD, Senn DR, Sweet D, Weems RA. Epidermis and enamel: insights into gnawing criticisms of human bitemark evidence. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2018;39(2):87–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000392.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Programa de Magister en Odontología, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile

    Paula Valentina Espinoza-Silva, Sandra López-Lázaro & Gabriel M. Fonseca

  2. Unidad de Estimación de Edad Dental, Centro de Investigación en Odontología Legal y Forense -CIO, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Region de la Araucania, 4780000, Chile

    Paula Valentina Espinoza-Silva, Sandra López-Lázaro & Gabriel M. Fonseca

  3. Departamento de Antropología Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Sandra López-Lázaro

Authors
  1. Paula Valentina Espinoza-Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandra López-Lázaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gabriel M. Fonseca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel M. Fonseca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Espinoza-Silva, P.V., López-Lázaro, S. & Fonseca, G.M. Forensic odontology and dental age estimation research: a scoping review a decade after the NAS report on strengthening forensic science. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 19, 224–235 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-022-00499-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-022-00499-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation