Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Association Between County-Level Surgeon Density and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Mortality

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgical resection plays an integral part in the curative treatment of esophageal (EC) and gastric cancer (GC). The impact of the allocation of surgeons at the county level on these cancer outcomes is unclear. Our aims were to examine the effect of surgeon density on EC and GC mortality and to compare the relative roles of thoracic and general surgeons on outcomes.

Methods

Using county-level data from the Area Resource File, we constructed multivariate regression models to explore the effect of thoracic and general surgeon density on EC and GC mortality, adjusting for cancer incidence rate, county-level, socioeconomic factors and health care resource metrics.

Results

In total, 663 and 539 counties were analyzed for EC and GC, respectively: Mean EC and GC mortality rates were 4.95 and 4.07; mean thoracic and general surgeon density were 6 and 50 per 100,000 people, respectively. When compared to counties with no thoracic surgeons, those with at least one thoracic surgeon had reduced EC mortality. For GC, counties with one or more general surgeons also had decreased deaths when compared with those without any general surgeons. While increasing the density of surgeons beyond ten only yielded minimal improvements in EC mortality, this resulted in significant further reductions in GC mortality.

Conclusions

Mortality from GC appears to be more susceptible to the benefits of increased surgeon density. For EC, a strategic policy of allocating health resources and distributing the surgical workforce proportionally across counties will be best able to optimize outcomes at the population-based level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Census Bureau. Population projections. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/www/projection/index.html.

  2. Cooper RA. The future of specialty care in the US. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008;4:333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper RA. The coming era of too few physicians. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2008;93:11–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Starfield B, Shi L, Grover A, Macinko J. The effects of specialist supply on populations’ health: assessing the evidence. Health Aff Millwood. 2005;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-97-W5-107.

  5. Chang RK, Halfon N. Geographic distribution of pediatricians in the United States: an analysis of the fifty states and Washington, DC. Pediatrics. 1997;100:172–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rasell ME. Cost sharing in health insurance—a reexamination. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1164–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2117–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper RA. States with more physicians have better-quality health care. Health Aff Millwood. 2009;28:w91–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Durme DJ, Ullman R, Campbell RJ, Roetzheim R. Effects of physician supply on melanoma incidence and mortality in Florida. South Med J. 2003;96:656–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fleisher JM, Lou JQ, Farrell M. Relationship between physician supply and breast cancer survival: a geographic approach. J Community Health. 2008;33:179–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorey KM, Luginaah IN, Fung KY, Bartfay E, Hamm C, Wright FC, et al. Physician supply and breast cancer survival. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23:104–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wright CD, Kucharczuk JC, O’Brien SM, Grab JD, Allen MS, Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database. Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk adjustment model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:587–95. discussion 596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. National Cancer Institute, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State cancer profiles. Available at: http://statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov. 2013.

  14. US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration: Area Resource File ARF. National county-level health resource information database. Available at: http://www.arfsys.com.

  15. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Rural–urban continuum codes.

  16. Hollenbeck BK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Volume, process of care, and operative mortality for cystectomy for bladder cancer. Urology. 2007;69:871–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Porter GA, Soskolne CL, Yakimets WW, Newman SC. Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 1998;227:157–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Martling A, Cedermark B, Johansson H, Rutqvist LE, Holm T. The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1008–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith JA, King PM, Lane RH, Thompson MR. Evidence of the effect of ‘specialization’ on the management, surgical outcome and survival from colorectal cancer in Wessex. Br J Surg. 2003;90:583–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McArdle CS, Hole DJ. Influence of volume and specialization on survival following surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;9:610–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bilimoria KY, Phillips JD, Rock CE, Hayman A, Prystowsky JB, Bentrem DJ. Effect of surgeon training, specialization, and experience on outcomes for cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1799–808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Borowski DW, Kelly SB, Bradburn DM, Wilson RG, Gunn A, Ratcliffe AA, et al. Impact of surgeon volume and specialization on short-term outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2007;94:880–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wibe A, Eriksen MT, Syse A, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Soreide O, et al. Effect of hospital caseload on long-term outcome after standardization of rectal cancer surgery at a national level. Br J Surg. 2005;92:217–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rabeneck L, Davila JA, Thompson M, El-Serag HB. Surgical volume and long-term survival following surgery for colorectal cancer in the Veterans Affairs Health-Care System. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:668–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245:777–83.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. van Gijn W, Gooiker GA, Wouters MW, Post PN, Tollenaar RA, van de Velde CJ. Volume and outcome in colorectal cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36 Suppl 1:S55–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Krakauer H, Jacoby I, Millman M, Lukomnik JE. Physician impact on hospital admission and on mortality rates in the Medicare population. Health Serv Res. 1996;31:191–211.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Goodman DC, Fisher ES, Little GA, Stukel TA, Chang CH, Schoendorf KS. The relation between the availability of neonatal intensive care and neonatal mortality. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1538–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Odisho AY, Cooperberg MR, Fradet V, Ahmad AE, Carroll PR. Urologist density and county-level urologic cancer mortality. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2499–504.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee W, Nelson R, Mailey B, Duldulao MP, Garcia-Aguilar J, Kim J. Socioeconomic factors impact colon cancer outcomes in diverse patient populations. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:692–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Aarts MJ, Lemmens VE, Louwman MW, Kunst AE, Coebergh JW. Socioeconomic status and changing inequalities in colorectal cancer? A review of the associations with risk, treatment and outcome. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:2681–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ferrer RL. Pursuing equity: contact with primary care and specialist clinicians by demographics, insurance, and health status. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:492–502.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute and the British Columbia Cancer Foundation for their support.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Winson Y. Cheung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ho, M.Y., Al-barrak, J., Peixoto, R.D. et al. The Association Between County-Level Surgeon Density and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Mortality. J Gastrointest Canc 45, 487–493 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-014-9661-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-014-9661-4

Keywords

Navigation