Abstract
The 1990s saw the three Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania change from centrally planned to more market oriented economies with associated societal transformations. Profound changes such as these create uncertainty and social instability that can lead to social problems including increased rates of crime and disorder. We report and comment upon Police recorded crime data that shows numbers of acquisitive and drug related crimes in the three states from 1993 to 2000. However the scale of economic change including the mediating effects of social institutions may vary from place to place within each state. Acquisitive crime is a phenomenon typical of urban or densely populated regions in the Baltic countries. Analysing regional variation in crime rates provides an opportunity to test whether negative socio-economic change impacts on rates for these crimes. Findings show weak evidence of the effect of social change on crime. Spatial statistical techniques and GIS (Geographical Information Systems) underpin the methodology employed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The average population of their regions is 1,850,000. The smallest population is 79,000, the largest 8,537,000. The standard deviation is 1,497,000 (Pridemore, personal communication).
Since its creation in 1995, the Corruption Perception Index has sought to quantify the perception of business people and country analysts of the degree of corruption in a country. From 1998 to 2006 the score of Baltic countries has improved but still ranks relatively low (in 2006: Estonia 6.7, Latvia 4.7 and Lithuania 4.8; where 10 is highly clean and 0 is highly corrupt) in comparison with their Scandinavian neighbours (Transparency International 2007).
A list of the experts who participated in this survey is shown at http://www.infra.kth.se/sp/Research/Transition/analytic1.htm
Another factor that also may have affected crime rates in the Baltic countries is that the total population in these countries decreased during this period. Since crime rates are often calculated based on resident population, certain regions might have reached a peak when natural increase was negative and out migration positive.
Estonia had missing data on foreign direct investment. Missing values were replaced by using other regressors in the model as instrumental variables, as suggested by Pindyck and Rubinfeld 1998; Kim and Pridemore 2005. The variable with the missing observation was regressed on all other independent variables that had complete data (index of social change for Lithuania and Latvia and Index of welfare change for Lithuania and Latvia) and used the predicted values to replace the missing data.
International Crime Victimisation Survey (ICVS) were carried out in Estonia in 1993, 1995 and 2000; in Latvia (Riga region) in 1996, 1998 and 2000; in Lithuania (Vilnius) in 1997 and 2000. Living Conditions Surveys (LCS) were performed in all Baltic countries in 1994 and 1999.
Crime data comparison using data from the Estonian Police Board, Latvia’s Ministry of Interior, Lithuania’s Ministry of Interior, Home Office (2003), European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics (1996, 2003) and population data: UNECE (2002) available at http://w3.unece.org/pxweb/Dialog/.
Because the Estonian islands are physically separated from the mainland and historically have had a different crime history, they were excluded from the analysis.
However this may not be a real change effect. The measure of social change is simply a difference in divorce rates at two points in time divided by the number of years to give a per annum rate of change. Disaggregating the change variable and combining parameter estimates with the divorce rate variable yields a measure that shows offence rates increasing with past divorce rates.
The same comment applies as for thefts (see footnote 9). However, following the same disaggregation, Latvia’s car related theft rate shows a strong association with the divorce rate in 2000.
References
Aasland, A., & Flotten, T. (2001). Ethnicity and social exclusion in Estonia and Latvia. Europe-Asia Studies, 53, 1023–1049.
Ahven, A. (2002). Crime in the Baltic states: comparing official statistics with survey data. In P. Nieuwbeerta (Ed.), Crime victimization in comparative perspective. Results from the International Crime Victims Survey, 1998–2000 (pp. 67–79). Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers.
Ahven, A. (2004). Public safety and well-being. Social trends 3. Statistical Office of Estonia. Tallinn, 108–117.
Anselin, L. (2003). GeoDa 0.9.3 User’s Guide. Spatial Analysis Laboratory, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 6180, available at (https://geoda.uiuc.edu/pdf/geoda093.pdf)
Berglund, S., Aarebrot, F., Vogt, H., & Karasimeonov, G. (2001). Challenges to Democracy (pp. 148–151). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bernburg, J. G. (2002). Anomie, social change and crime: a theoretical examination of institutional-anomie theory. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 729–742.
Bernhagen, P., & Marsh, M. (2007). Voting and protesting: explaining citizen participation in old and new European Democracies. Democratisation, 14(1), 44–72.
Bursik, R., & Grasmick, H. (1993). Neighbourhoods and Crime: The dimensions of effective community control. New York: Lexington Books.
Butler, W. E. (1992). Crime in the Soviet Union: early glimpses of the true story. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 144–166.
Ceccato, V. (2007). Crime dynamics at Lithuanian borders. European Journal of Criminology, 4, 131–160.
Ceccato, V. (2008). Expressive crimes in post-socialist states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 9, 2–30.
Ceccato, V., & Haining, R. (2004). Crime in border regions: the Scandinavian case of Öresund, 1998–2001. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 807–826.
Ceccato, V., Haining, R., & Signoretta, P. (2002). Exploring crime statistics in Stockholm using spatial analysis tools. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 22, 29–51.
Chamlin, M. B., & Cochran, J. K. (1995). Assessing Messner and Rosenfed’s institutional anomie theory: a partial test. Criminology, 33, 411–429.
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.
Corcoran, M. E., & Chaudry, A. (1997). The dynamics of childhood poverty. The Future of Children, 7, 40–54.
Daunora, J., & Juskevicius, P. (2006) Regional planning in Lithuania: experiences and challenges. In U. Altrock, S. Guntner, S. Huning, D. Peters (eds.), Spatial Planning and Urban Development in the New EU Member States, from adjustment to reinvention (pp. 77– 94). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Del Frate, A. A., & van Kesteren, J. (2004). Criminal victimisation in urban Europe. UNICRI (Available at http://www.unicri.it/icvs, 18 November 2006).
Durkheim, E. (1897). Suicide: a study in sociology. New York: Free Press.
Eurogeographics (2005). SABE 2004 – Seamless Administrative Boundaries of Europe User Guide, version 1.0, 38 p.
European sourcebook of crime and criminal justice statistics (1996). draft model European Committee on Crime Problems (chair: M. Killias), Strasbourg: Council of Europe. (Available at http://www.europeansourcebook.org/, 16 March 2006).
European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics (2003). Second Edition European Council, Committee of Experts (chair: M. Killias) The Hague/London/Paris: WODC/Home Office/ESC-École des sciences criminelles, 2003 ISBN 90-5454-408-2, (Series:) Onderzoek en beleid, no. 212. (Available at http://www.minjust.nl:8080/b_organ/wodc/reports/ob212i.htm, 16 March 2006).
Europol (2004). 2004 European Union organised crime report p. 26. Luxembourg: Europol.
Eurostat (2003). New Chronos Database: Number of divorces per 100 new marriages in the corresponding year. (Available at http://www.eurofound.eu.int/areas/qualityoflife/index.htm, 07 July 2006).
Gavrilova, N. S., Semyonova, V., Evdokushkina, G. N., & Gavrilov, L. A. (2000). The response of violent mortality to economic crisis in Russia. Population Research and Policy Review, 19, 397–419.
Gruszczynska, B., & Gruszczynska, M. (2004). Crime in enlarged Europe: comparison of crime rates and victimization risks. Transition Studies Review, 12, 337–345.
Haining, R. (2003). Spatial data analysis: theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heiskanen M, Sire’n R, Aromaa K (2004). Victimisation and Fear in Finland 2003. Interim Report of the 2003 National Survey of Victimisation to Accidents, Violence, Property Crime, and Fear. Research Communications 59.
Holloway, K., Bennett, T., & Lower, C. (2004). Trends in drug use and offending: the results of the NEW-ADAM Programme 1999–2002. Home office, Findings 219, London (available at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/r219.pdf, 03 October 2006)
Iwaskiw, R. (1996). Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania: country studies. Washington: Library of Congress.
Jurgelenas, A., Mieliauskaite, D., & Filipaviciute, R. (2005). From the former Soviet Union: socioeconomic health inequalities exist in post-communist Lithuania. British Medical Journal, 331, 236.
Kim, S. W., & Pridemore, W. A. (2005). Social change, institutional anomie and serious property crime in transitional Russia. British journal of criminology, 45, 81–97.
Kornai, J. (1990). The road to a free economy. New York: W.W.Norton.
Lehti, M. (2001). Homicide trends in Estonia, 1971–1996. In H. Ylikangas, P. Karonen, & M. Lehti (Eds.), Five centuries of violence in Finland and the Baltic area (pp. 133–192). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Leon, D. A., & Shkolnikov, V. M. (1998). Social stress and the Russian mortality crisis. Journal of the American medical association, 279, 790–791.
Lévay, M. (2000). Social changes and rising crime rates: the case of central and eastern Europe. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 8, 35–50.
Levitt, S. (1999). The changing relationship between income and crime victimisation. Economic Policy Review, 5, 87–98.
Lewis, P. (1997). Political Participation in Postcommunist Democracies. In D. Potter, et al. (Ed.), Democratization (p. 459). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lin, G., & Zhang, T. (2007). Loglinear residual tests of Moran’s I autocorrelation and their application to Kentucky breast cancer data. Geographical Analysis, 39, 293–310.
Liu, J. (2005). Crime patterns during the market transition in China. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 613–633.
Lotspeich, R. (1995). Crime in the transition economies. Europe-Asia Studies, 47, 555–589.
Marana, I. (2006). Development and Planning in Latvia, the Riga Region and the City of Riga. In U. Altrock, S. Guntner, S. Huning, & D. Peters (Eds.), Spatial Planning and Urban Development in the New EU Member States, from adjustment to reinvention (pp. 225–243). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Merton, R. K. (1967). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (1997). Political restraint of the market and levels of criminal homicide: a cross national application of institutional anomie theory. Social Forces, 75, 1393–1416.
NCPD, and National Commissioner of Danish Police. Status Report on Organised Crime in Denmark in 2001 (2002). [cited. Available from (http://www.politi.dk/PUBL/Organiseret_kriminalitet_2000/Orgkrim_2001_endeligversion_eng.doc.
Nilsson, A., & Estrada, F. (2006). The inequality of victimisation: trends in exposure to crime among rich and poor. European Journal of Criminology, 3, 387–412.
Osgood, D. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 21–43.
Osgood, D., & Chambers, J. (2000). Social disorganization outside the metropolis: an anlysis of rural youth violence. Criminology, 38, 81–116.
Pampel, F., & Gartner, R. (1995). Age structure, socio-political institutions, and national homicide rates. European Sociological Review, 11, 243–260.
Persson, L. G. W. (1999). Cigarett smugglingens struktur, omfattning och utveckling under senare delen av 1990-talet: Fran ax till limpa. Stockholm: BRÅ.
Philipov, D., & Dorbritz, J. (2003). Demographic consequences of economic transition in countries of central and eastern Europe. Population studies, 39, Council of Europe, 208p. (Available at http://www.coe.int/T/E/social_cohesion/population/, 10 July 2006).
Pichler-Milanovich, N. (1997). The role of Baltic cities in the European urban system: forgotten cities or important regional actors. In M. Åberg, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Baltic cities: Perspectives on urban and regional change in the Baltic sea area. Lund: Nordic Academic.
Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformations: the political and economic origins of our times (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Beacon.
Pridemore, W. A., & Spivak, A. L. (2003). Patterns of suicide mortality in Russia. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour, 33, 132–150.
Saar, J., Markina, A., Ahven, A., Annist, A., & Ginter, J. (2003). Crime in Estonia 1991–2001, 2nd ed. Tallinn: Juura, (in Estonian and English), 2002.
Salt, J. (2005). Current trends in international migration in Europe. Council of Europe, CDMG (2005) 2. (Available at http://www.coe.int/t/e/social_cohesion/migration/documentation/Publications_and_reports/2005%20Salt’s%20report%20English.pdf, August 28, 2007)
Sampson, R. J. (1983). Structural density and criminal victimization. Criminology, 21, 276–293.
Sampson, R. J. (1985). Neighbourhood and crime: the structural determinants of personal victimization. Jo, Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 7–4.
Sampson, R. J. (1986). Crime in cities: the effects of formal and informal social control. Crime and Justice, 8, 271–311.
Savolainen, J. (2000). Inequality, welfare state and homicide: further support for the institutional anomie theory. Criminology, 38, 1021–1042.
Stickley, A., & Mäkinen, I. H. (2005). Homicide in the Russian empire and soviet union: continuity or change? British Journal of Criminology, 45, 647–670.
Tammaru, T. (2005). Suburbanisation, employment change, and commuting in the Tallinn metropolitan area. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1669–1687.
Transparency International (2007). Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), (Available at http://www.transparency.org/, 23 August, 2007).
Trickett, A., Ellingworth, D., Hope, T., & Pease, K. (1995). Crime victimisation in the eighties. British Journal of Criminology, 35, 343–359.
Ulrich, C. (1994). The growth of crime in Russia and the Baltic region: RFE/RL Research Report.
Young, J., & Mathews, R. (2003). New Labour, crime control and social exclusion. In R. Mathews, & Y. Young (Eds.),The new politics of crime and punishment. Devon: Willan Publishing.
Acknowledgements
The support of The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation (Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, grant J2004-0142:1) is gratefully acknowledged by the authors. Thanks also to colleagues Andri Ahven, Aira Veelmaa (Estonia), Alfredas Kiskis, Danguole Bikmanaite (Lithuania) and Andris Kairiss (Latvia) for providing data and support during the project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper is part of the project ‘States in transition and their geography of crime’, financed by The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation (Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, grant J2004-0142:1), at the Department of Urban Planning and Environment, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ceccato, V., Haining, R. Short and Medium term Dynamics and their Influence on Acquisitive Crime Rates in the Transition States of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Appl. Spatial Analysis 1, 215–244 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-008-9009-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-008-9009-1