Abstract
In a rapidly changing business environment, supply chain agility has been recognized as an important source of sustainable competitive advantage. A large number of studies have explored the antecedents of supply chain agility, but there is little analysis from a strategic perspective. Taking into account the guiding role of strategic orientation in business development, we want to establish a link between strategic orientation and supply chain agility. Therefore, this paper chooses two strategic orientation, namely learning orientation and technology orientation, as two antecedents and test their effect on supply chain agility and also test whether supply chain agility has a mediating effect on the relationship between the two antecedents and business performance. Survey data were collected from 208 Chinese manufacturing enterprises and the structural equation model (SEM) was used to test the proposed hypotheses in the research model. The results show that the two antecedents have a positive effect on supply chain agility and supply chain agility can improve business performance. It also shows that both learning orientation and technology orientation can indirectly promote business performance through the mediating effect of supply chain agility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris C, Schon D (1978) Learning orientation: a theory of action perspective. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley
Baker WE, Sinkula JM (1999) The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. J Acad Market Sci 27(4):411–427
Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120
Blome C, Schoenherr T, Rexhausen D (2013) Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: a dynamics capabilities perspective. Int J Prod Res 51(4):1295–1318
Braunscheidel M, Suresh NC (2009) The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. J Oper Manag 27:119–140
Calantone RJ, Cavusgil ST, Zhao Y (2002) Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Ind Market Manag 31:515–524
Chan ATL, Ngai EWT, Moon KKL (2017) The effects of strategic and manufacturing flexibilities and supply chain agility on firm performance in the fashion industry. Eur J Oper Res 259:486–499
Chen Y, Tang G, Jin J, Xie Q, Li J (2014) CEOs’ transformational leadership and product innovation performance: the roles of corporate entrepreneurship and technology orientation. J Prod Innovat Manag 31(S1):01–16
Chiang C, Kocabasoglu-Hillmer C, Suresh N (2012) An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm’s supply chain agility. Int J Oper Prod Man 32(1):49–78
DeGroote SE, Marx TG (2013) The impact of IT on supply chain agility and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Int J Inform Manage 33:909–916
Dickson PR (1996) The static and dynamic mechanics of competition: a comment on Hunt and Morgan’s comparative advantage theory. J Marketing 60(4):102–106
Eckstein D, Goellner M, Blome C, Henke M (2015) The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: the moderating effect of product complexity. Int J Prod Res 53(10):3028–3046
Ellinger AE, Chen H, Tian Y, Armstrong C (2015) Learning orientation, integration, and supply chain risk management in Chinese manufacturing firms. Int J Logist: Res App 18(6):476–493
Flynn BB, Huo B, Zhao X (2010) The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. J Oper Manag 28(1):58–71
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res 18(1):29–50
Gao GY, Zhou KZ, Yim CKB (2007) On what should firms focus on transitional economies? A study of the contingent value of strategic orientation in China. Int J Res Mark 24:3–15
Gatignon H, Xuereb J (1997) Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. J Marketing Res 34(1):77–90
Gligor DM, Holcomb MC (2012) Antecedents and consequences of supply chain agility: establishing the link to firm performance. J Bus Logist 33(4):295–308
Gligor DM, Esmark CL, Holcomb MC (2015) Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: when should you be agile? J Oper Manag 33–34:71–82
Gligor DM, Holcomb MC, Feizabadi J (2016) An exploration of the strategic antecedents of firm supply chain agility: the role of a firm’s orientations. Int J Prod Econ 179:24–34
Hakala H (2011) Strategic orientations in management literature: three approaches to understanding the interaction between market, technology, entrepreneurial and learning orientation. Int J Manag Rev 13:199–217
Hair JF Jr, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Hult GTM, Ketchen DJ, Nichols ELN (2002) An examination of cultural competitiveness and order fulfillment cycle time within supply chains. Acad Manage J 45(3):577–586
Hult GTM, Ketchen DJ, Arrfelt M (2007) Strategic supply chain management: improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development. Strategic Manage J 28:1035–1052
Hurley RH, Hult GT (1998) Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. J Marketing 62:42–54
Irfan M, Wang M, Akhtar N (2019) Impact of IT capabilities on supply chain capabilities and organizational agility: a dynamic capability view. Oper Manag Res 12:113–128
Jennings J, Haughton L (2002) It’s not the big that eat the small...It’s the fast that eat the slow: how to use speed as a competitive tool in business. New York: HarperCollins Publishers
Jeong I, Pea JH, Zhou D (2006) Antecedents and consequences of the strategic orientations in new product development: the case of Chinese manufacturers. Ind Market Manag 35:348–358
Keskin H (2006) Market orientation, learning orientation, and innovation capabilities in SMEs: an extended model. Eur J Innov Manag 9(4):396–417
Kim N, Im S, Slater SF (2013) Impact of knowledge type and strategic orientation on new product creativity and advantage in high-technology firms. J Prod Innovat Manag 30(1):136–153
Kim M, Chai S (2017) The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: global supply chain perspective. Int J Prod Econ 187:42–52
Hwang T, Kim ST (2019) Balancing in-house and outsourced logistics services: effects on supply chain agility and firm performance. Serv Bus 13:531–556
Lichtenthaler U (2016) Determinants of absorptive capacity: the value of technology and market orientation for external knowledge acquisition. J Bus Ind Mark 31(5):2–30
Liu H, Ke W, Wei KK, Hua Z (2013) The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: the mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Decis Support Syst 54:1452–1462
Liu H, Wei S, Ke W, Wei KK, Hua Z (2016) The configuration between supply chain integration and information technology competency: a resource orchestration perspective. J Oper Manag 44:13–29
Liu S (2012) Effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance: the mediating effect of product innovation. Study Sci Sci 25(2):301–305
Mandal S (2016) An empirical investigation on integrated logistics capabilities, supply chain agility and firm performance. Int J Serv Oper Manag 24(4):504–530
Meng Y, Chen J, Zhang Z, Zhang Y (2015) An empirical study on the relationship between multinational corporations’ learning orientation and corporate performance: the mediation role of competitive advantage and the moderating effect of dynamic capabilities. Forecasting 34(3):8–13
Mosakowski E (1993) A resource-based perspective on the dynamic strategy performance relationship: an empirical examination of the focus and differentiation strategies in entrepreneurial firms. J Manage 4:819–839
Ngai EWT, Chau DCK, Chan TLA (2011) Information technology, operational, and management competencies for supply chain agility: finding from case studies. J Strategic Inf Syst 20:232–249
Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee J, Pldsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903
Qrunfleh S, Tarafdar M (2013) Supply chain information systems strategy: impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance. Int J Prod Econ 147:340–350
Real JC, Roldán JL, Leal A (2014) From entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation to business performance: analyzing the mediating role of organizational learning and the moderating effects of organizational size. Brit J Manage 25:186–208
Rhee J, Park T, Lee DH (2010) Drivers of innovativeness and performance for innovative SMEs in South Korea: mediation of learning orientation. Technovation 3:65–75
Sharma N, Sahay BS, Shankar R, Sarma PRS (2017) Supply chain agility: review, classification and synthesis. Int J Logist: Res App 20(6):532–559
Sinkula J, Baker WE, Noordewier T (1997) A framework for market-based organizational learning: linking values, knowledge, and behavior. J Acad Market Sci 25(4):305–318
Slater SF, Narver JC (1995) Market orientation and the learning organization. J Marketing 59(3):63–74
Slater SF, Hult GTM, Olson EM (2007) On the importance of matching strategic behavior and target market selection to business strategy in high-tech markets. J of the Acad Mark Sci 35:5–17
Swafford PM, Ghosh S, Murthy N (2006) The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: scale development and model testing. J Oper Manag. 24(2):170–188
Tan JJ, Litschert BJ (1994) Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implications: an empirical study of the Chinese electronics industry. Strategic Manage J 15(1):1–20
Voss GB, Voss ZG (2000) Strategic orientation and firm performance in an artistic environment. J Marketing 64:67–83
Wang CL (2008) Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrep Theory Pract 32(4):635–656
Xie H, Liu C, Chen C (2007) Relationships among market orientation, learning orientation, organizational innovation and organizational performance: an empirical study in the Pearl River Delta region of China. Front Bus Res China 1(2):222–253
Yang J (2014) Supply chain agility: securing performance for Chinese manufactures. Int J Prod Econ 150:104–113
Yu Y, Dong X, Shen KN, Khalifa M, Hao J (2013) Strategies, technologies, and organizational learning for developing organizational innovativeness in emerging economies. J Bus Res 66:2507–2514
Yu W, Jacobs MA, Chavez R, Feng M (2017) The impacts of IT capability and marketing capability on supply chain integration: a resource-based perspective. Int J Prod Res 55(14):4196–4211
Yusuf YY, Gunasekaran A, Musa A, Dauda M, El-Berishy NM, Cang S (2014) A relational study of supply chain agility, competitiveness and business performance in the oil and gas industry. Int J Prod Econ 147:531–543
Zhou KZ, Yim CK, Tse D (2005) The effects of strategic orientations on technology-and market-based breakthrough innovations. J Marketing 69(2):42–60
Zhou KZ, Li CB (2007) How does strategic orientation matter in Chinese firms? Asia Pac J Manag 24:447–466
Um J (2017) The impact of supply chain agility on business performance in a high level customization environment. Oper Manag Res 10:10-19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, M., Gao, H. The antecedents of supply chain agility and their effect on business performance: an organizational strategy perspective. Oper Manag Res 14, 166–176 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-020-00174-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-020-00174-9