Skip to main content
Log in

Why it Never Really was About Authenticity

  • Symposium: Touring the World
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Critics of the concept fail to note that staged authenticity is not authenticity but its opposite or negation. This error is illustrated referencing Ed Bruner’s reading of The Tourist in his recent book Culture on Tour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • Bruner, E. (2005). Culture on tour: ethnographies of travel. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCannell, D. (1973). “Staged authenticity: on arrangements of social space in tourist settings.”. The American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCannell, D. (1999). The tourist: a new theory of the leisure class. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCannell, D. (2008). “Staged authenticity today”. In M. Sorkin (Ed.),Indefensible space: the architecture of the national security state (pp. 259–276). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dean MacCannell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacCannell, D. Why it Never Really was About Authenticity . Soc 45, 334–337 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-008-9110-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-008-9110-8

Keywords

Navigation