Abstract
Evolutionary scholars have highlighted how there are two normative approaches to enhancing one’s status: dominance and prestige. Several individual differences have been found to differentially predict dominance and prestige status-seeking. The four socially aversive personality dimensions embodied within the Dark Tetrad (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism) seem to be important in understanding the nuance between dominance and prestige. Nonetheless, few researchers have assessed these relations and it is unclear what behavioural mechanisms may facilitate status-striving orientations among those with “darker” personality traits. In the current study, 516 North American adults (Mage = 37.90, SD = 12.76; 53.1% women) completed self-report measures for the Dark Tetrad, dominance and prestige status-striving, and the perpetration of indirect aggression. Using path analysis, narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, but not sadism, positively predicted dominance status-striving, whereas only narcissism positively predicted prestige. The perpetration of indirect aggression was found to mediate the links between psychopathy and sadism with dominance status-striving. Results reaffirm the importance of considering more malevolent personality characteristics regarding the different ways in which adults strive for, accrue, and maintain status. The strategic use of indirect aggression may be a salient means through which those higher in psychopathy and sadism pursue dominance status-striving.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Miller, J. L., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females' indirect aggression. Personal Relationships, 19(2), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01362.x
Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). A multi-informant longitudinal study on the relationship between aggression, peer victimization, and dating status in adolescence. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(2), 253–270. doi: 10.1177%2F147470491201000207
Bernstein, I. S. (1976). Dominance, aggression and reproduction in primate societies. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 60(2), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(76)90072-2
Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1%3C27::AID-AB2480200105%3E3.0.CO;2-Q
Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Landau, S. F., Caprara, G. V., & Fraczek, A. (2001). Aggression, victimization and sociometric status: Findings from Finland, Israel, Italy and Poland. In J. M. Ramirez & D. S. Richardson (Eds.), Cross-cultural approaches to research on aggression and reconciliation (pp. 111–119). Nova Science Publishers.
Blake, K. R. (2021). Attractiveness helps women secure mates, but also status and reproductively relevant resources. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01949-2
Boddy, C. R. (2010). Corporate psychopaths and organizational type. Journal of Public Affairs, 10(4), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.365
Book, A., Visser, B. A., Blais, J., Hosker-Field, A., Methot-Jones, T., Gauthier, N. Y., et al. (2016). Unpacking more “evil”: What is at the core of the dark tetrad? Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.009
Book, A., Visser, B. A., & Volk, A. A. (2015). Unpacking “evil”: Claiming the core of the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.016
Bradshaw, H. K., & DelPriore, D. J. (2021). Beautification is more than mere mate attraction: Extending evolutionary perspectives on female appearance enhancement. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01952-7
Brañas-Garza, P., Rodríguez-Lara, I., & Sánchez, A. (2017). Humans expect generosity. Scientific Reports, 7, 42446. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42446
Buckels, E. E., Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2201–2209. doi: 10.1177%2F0956797613490749
Buss, D. M. (1981). Sex differences in the evaluation and performance of dominant acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.1.147
Buss, D. M. (1994). The strategies of human mating. American Scientist, 82(3), 238–249. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29775193
Buss, D. M., Durkee, P. K., Shackelford, T. K., Bowdle, B. F., Schmitt, D. P., Brase, G. L., Choe, J. C., & Trofimova, I. (2020). Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 979–998. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000206
Cabral, J. C. C., & de Almeida, R. M. M. (2019). Effects of anger on dominance-seeking and aggressive behaviors. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.07.006
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x
Chabrol, H., Bouvet, R., & Goutaudier, N. (2017). The Dark Tetrad and antisocial behavior in a community sample of college students. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 17(5), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2017.1361310
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.004
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030398
Coyne, S. M., & Archer, J. (2004). Indirect aggression in the media: A content analysis of British television programs. Aggressive behavior, 30(3), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20022
Davis, A. C., Visser, B. A., Volk, A. A., Vaillancourt, T., & Arnocky, S. (2019). The relations between life history strategy and dark personality traits among young adults. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0175-3
de Waal, F. B. (1986). The integration of dominance and social bonding in primates. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 61(4), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1086/415144
Dickinson, K. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of personality Disorders, 17(3), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.17.3.188.22146
Farrell, A. H., & Vaillancourt, T. (2019). Temperament, bullying, and dating aggression: Longitudinal associations for adolescents in a romantic relationship. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919847450
Farrell, A. H., & Vaillancourt, T. (2021). Joint trajectories of adolescent narcissism and self-esteem predict interpersonal features in young adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality, 93, 104127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104127
Forrest, S., Eatough, V., & Shevlin, M. (2005). Measuring adult indirect aggression: The development and psychometric assessment of the Indirect Aggression Scales. Aggressive Behavior, 31(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20074
Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
Gilbert, P., & Basran, J. (2019). The evolution of prosocial and antisocial competitive behavior and the emergence of prosocial and antisocial leadership styles. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 610. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00610
Grapsas, S., Brummelman, E., Back, M. D., & Denissen, J. J. (2020). The “why” and “how” of narcissism: A process model of narcissistic status pursuit. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 150–172. doi: 10.1177%2F1745691619873350
Galperin, B. L., Bennett, R. J., & Aquino, K. (2011). Status differentiation and the protean self: A social-cognitive model of unethical behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0556-4
Guo, Y. (2017). The influence of social support on the prosocial behavior of college students: The mediating effect based on interpersonal trust. English Language Teaching, 10(12), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n12p158
Hare, R. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. Harper Collins.
Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-), 279–309. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23096057
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4
Heym, N., Firth, J., Kibowski, F., Sumich, A., Egan, V., & Bloxsom, C. A. (2019). Empathy at the heart of darkness: Empathy deficits that bind the dark triad and those that mediate indirect relational aggression. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 95. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00095
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. http://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/6596/
Ingram, G. P. (2014). From hitting to tattling to gossip: An evolutionary rationale for the development of indirect aggression. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(2), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F147470491401200205
Johnson, R. T., Burk, J. A., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2007). Dominance and prestige as differential predictors of aggression and testosterone levels in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(5), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.003
Jonason, P. K., Slomski, S., & Partyka, J. (2012). The Dark Triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and individual differences, 52(3), 449–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.008
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.023
Jonason, P. K., Wee, S., & Li, N. P. (2014). Thinking bigger and better about “bad apples”: Evolutionary industrial–organizational psychology and the dark triad. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(1), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12118
Jonason, P. K., Wee, S., & Li, N. P. (2015). Competition, autonomy, and prestige: Mechanisms through which the Dark Triad predict job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.026
Jonason, P. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Okan, C. (2017). Good v. evil: Predicting sinning with dark personality traits and moral foundations. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.002
Jones, C., Peskin, H., & Wandeler, C. (2017). Femininity and dominance across the lifespan: Longitudinal findings from two cohorts of women. Journal of Adult Development, 24(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-016-9243-8
Jones, D. N., & Neria, A. L. (2015). The Dark Triad and dispositional aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 360–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.021
Kafashan, S., Sparks, A., Griskevicius, V., & Barclay, P. (2014). Prosocial behavior and social status. In J. T. Cheng, J. L. Tracy, & C. Anderson (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 139–158). Springer Science + Business Media.
Kay, C. S., & Saucier, G. (2020). Insert a joke about lawyers: Evaluating preferences for the Dark Triad traits in six occupations. Personality and Individual Differences, 159(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109863
Klimstra, T. A., Jeronimus, B. F., Sijtsema, J. J., & Denissen, J. J. (2020). The unfolding dark side: Age trends in dark personality features. Journal of Research in Personality, 85, 103915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103915
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Kokko, K., & Pulkkinen, L. (2005). Stability of aggressive behavior from childhood to middle age in women and men. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 31(5), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20063
LaFreniere, P. J., & Charlesworth, W. R. (1983). Dominance, attention and affiliation in a preschool group: A nine-month longitudinal study. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(83)90030-4
Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., Visser, B. A., & Gallucci, A. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty–Humility. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1860
Lee, K. S., Brittain, H., & Vaillancourt, T. (2018). Predicting dating behavior from aggression and self-perceived social status in adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 44(4), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21758
Maner, J. K. (2017). Dominance and prestige: A tale of two hierarchies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 526–531. doi: 10.1177%2F0963721417714323
Masten, A. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2010). Developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000222
March, E., Grieve, R., Marrington, J., & Jonason, P. K. (2017). Trolling on Tinder®(and other dating apps): Examining the role of the Dark Tetrad and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.025
Marjanovic, Z., Struthers, C. W., Cribbie, R., & Greenglass, E. R. (2014). The Conscientious Responders Scale: A new tool for discriminating between conscientious and random responders. Sage Open, 4(3). doi: 10.1177%2F2158244014545964
Melis, A. P., & Semmann, D. (2010). How is human cooperation different? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1553), 2663–2674. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0157
Miller, J. D., Vize, C., Crowe, M. L., & Lynam, D. R. (2019). A critical appraisal of the dark-triad literature and suggestions for moving forward. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 353–360. doi: 10.1177%2F0963721419838233
Monge-López, D., & Álvarez-Solas, S. (2017). Self-perceived social status: its relation to aggression and personality traits in two Spanish speaking samples. Actualidades en Psicología, 31(123), 2–12. doi: 10.15517/ap.v31i123.26441
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior. The Plenum series in social/clinical psychology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9116-7_5
Pan, Q. Q., & Yu, F. (2017). The influential effects of narcissism leadership and its managerial implications. In L. Liu (Ed.), Humanity and social science: Proceedings of the International Conference on Humanity and Social Science (ICHSS2016) (pp. 48–54).
Paulhus, D. L., Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Jones, D. N. (2020). Screening for Dark Personalities. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000602
Paulhus, D. L., Curtis, S. R., & Jones, D. N. (2018). Aggression as a trait: the Dark Tetrad alternative. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.007
Paulhus, D. L., Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Tracy, J. L. (2004). Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_7
Pavlić, I., & Međedović, J. (2019). Psychopathy facilitates workplace success. Psihološka Istraživanja, 22(1), 69–87. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=792994
Rauthmann, J. F., & Kolar, G. P. (2012). How “dark” are the Dark Triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 884–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.020
Raykov, T., Lee, C. L., Marcoulides, G. A., & Chang, C. (2013). A commentary on the relationship between model fit and saturated path models in structural equation modeling applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 1054–1068. doi: 10.1177%2F0013164413487905
Reidy, D. E., Zeichner, A., & Seibert, L. A. (2011). Unprovoked aggression: Effects of psychopathic traits and sadism. Journal of Personality, 79(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00691.x
Roberts, A., Palermo, R., & Visser, T. A. (2019). Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39223-0
Rosenthal, S. A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.005
Russell, T. D., & King, A. R. (2017). Mean girls: PID-5 personality traits and everyday sadism predict hostile femininity. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.020
Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. (2000). Aggression and sociometric status among peers: Do gender and type of aggression matter? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00166
Semenyna, S. W., & Honey, P. L. (2015). Dominance styles mediate sex differences in Dark Triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.046
Sijtsema, J. J., Lindenberg, S. M., Ojanen, T. J., & Salmivalli, C. (2020). Direct aggression and the balance between status and affection goals in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1481–1491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01166-0
Stürmur, S., & Snyder, M. (2009) (Eds.). The psychology of prosocial behavior: Group processes, intergroup relations, and helping. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://dx.doi.org/10.5116%2Fijme.4dfb.8dfd
Thompson, C. G., Kim, R. S., Aloe, A. M., & Becker, B. J. (2017). Extracting the variance inflation factor and other multicollinearity diagnostics from typical regression results. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2016.1277529
Tomasello, M. (2014). The ultra-social animal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(3), 187–194. doi: 10.1002%2Fejsp.2015
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755
Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1631). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0080
Vaillancourt, T., & Farrell, A. H. (2021). Mean kids become mean adults: Trajectories of indirect aggression from age 10 to 22. Aggressive Behavior, 47(4), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21950
Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20138
Vaillancourt, T., & Krems, J. A. (2018). An evolutionary psychological perspective of indirect aggression in girls and women. In S. M. Coyne & J. M. Ostrov (Eds.), The development of relational aggression (pp. 111–126). Oxford University Press.
Vaillancourt, T., McDougall, P., Hymel, S., & Sunderani, S. (2010). Respect or fear? The relationship between power and bullying behavior. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 211–222). Routledge.
Vaillancourt, T., & Sunderani, S. (2011). Psychopathy and indirect aggression: The roles of cortisol, sex, and type of psychopathy. Brain and Cognition, 77(2), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.06.009
Van Vugt, M., & Smith, J. E. (2019). A dual model of leadership and hierarchy: Evolutionary synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(11), 952–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.09.004
Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
Availability of Data and Materials
Data can be made available upon request from Dr. Tracy Vaillancourt (tracy.vaillancourt@uottawa.ca).
Funding
Adam C. Davis is supported by a Joseph-Armand Bombardier Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Canada Graduate Scholarship (CGS) Doctoral award. Dr. Tracy Vaillancourt is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant, which helped to pay for the current project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Adam C. Davis wrote the research proposal for ethics, conducted the analyses, and wrote the manuscript draft. Dr. Tracy Vaillancourt is the principal investigator and helped with editing the research proposal and manuscript, as well as funding the larger research project from which the current study is a part of.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
There were no conflicts of interest or competing interests involved with the current manuscript.
Code Availability
Mplus (version 8.1) syntax for the path model used in the current study can be found in the supplemental materials file.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 26 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, A.C., Vaillancourt, T. Predicting dominance and prestige status-striving from the dark tetrad: The mediating role of indirect aggression. Curr Psychol 42, 13680–13692 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02492-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02492-y