Abstract
Background
Most breast cancer survivors do not meet physical activity recommendations. Understanding mediators of physical activity behavior change can improve interventions designed to increase physical activity in this at-risk population.
Purpose
Study aims were to determine the 3-month Better Exercise Adherence after Treatment for Cancer (BEAT Cancer) behavior change intervention effects on social cognitive theory constructs and the mediating role of any changes on the increase in accelerometer-measured physical activity previously reported.
Methods
Post-treatment breast cancer survivors (N = 222) were randomized to BEAT Cancer or usual care. Assessments occurred at baseline, 3 months (M3), and 6 months (M6). Adjusted linear mixed model analysis of variance determined intervention effects on walking self-efficacy, outcome expectations, goal setting, and perceived barrier interference at M3. Path analysis determined mediation of intervention effects on physical activity at M6 by changes in social cognitive constructs during the intervention (i.e., baseline to M3).
Results
BEAT Cancer significantly improved self-efficacy, goals, negative outcome expectations, and barriers. Total path analysis model explained 24 % of the variance in M6 physical activity. There were significant paths from randomized intervention group to self-efficacy (β = 0.15, p < .05) and barriers (β = −0.22, p < .01). Barriers demonstrated a borderline significant association with M6 physical activity (β = −0.24, p = .05). No statistically significant indirect effects were found.
Conclusions
Although BEAT Cancer significantly improved social cognitive constructs, no significant indirect effects on physical activity improvements 3 months post-intervention were observed (NCT00929617).
References
Schmid D, Leitzmann MF. Association between physical activity and mortality among breast cancer and colorectal cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25(7):1293–1311.
Speck RM, Courneya KS, Masse LC, Duval S, Schmitz KH. An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2010; 4(2):87–100.
Bodai BI, Tuso P. Breast cancer survivorship: A comprehensive review of long-term medical issues and lifestyle recommendations. Perm J. 2015; 19(2):48–79.
Demark-Wahnefried W, Rogers LQ, Alfano CM, et al. Practical clinical interventions for diet, physical activity, and weight control in cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65(3):167–189.
Blanchard CM, Courneya KS, Stein K. Cancer survivors’ adherence to lifestyle behavior recommendations and associations with health-related quality of life: Results from the American Cancer Society’s SCS-II. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(13):2198–2204.
Stacey FG, James EL, Chapman K, Courneya KS, Lubans DR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2014.
Young MD, Plotnikoff RC, Collins CE, Callister R, Morgan PJ. Social cognitive theory and physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2014; 15(12):983–995.
Belanger-Gravel A, Godin G, Vezina-Im LA, Amireault S, Poirier P. The effect of theory-based interventions on physical activity participation among overweight/obese individuals: A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2011; 12(6):430–439.
Prestwich A, Sniehotta FF, Whittington C, et al. Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2014; 33(5):465–474.
Rogers LQ, Courneya KS, Anton PM, et al. Effects of the BEAT Cancer physical activity behavior change intervention on physical activity, aerobic fitness, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 149(1):109–119.
Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
Rogers LQ, McAuley E, Anton PM, et al. Better exercise adherence after treatment for cancer (BEAT Cancer) study: Rationale, design, and methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012; 33(1):124–137.
USDHHS. 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2008.
McAuley E, Mihalko SL. Advances in Sports and Exercise Psychology Measurement. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology, Inc., 1998.
Maddux JE (ed): Self-efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment: Theory, Research, and Application. New York: Plenum Press, 1995.
Short CE, James EL, Stacey F, Plotnikoff RC. A qualitative synthesis of trials promoting physical activity behaviour change among post-treatment breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2013; 7(4):570–581.
Rodgers WM, Murray TC, Selzler AM, Norman P. Development and impact of exercise self-efficacy types during and after cardiac rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2013; 58(2):178–184.
Rogers LQ, McAuley E, Courneya KS, Humphries MC, Gutin B. Racial differences in physical activity associations among primary care patients. Ethn Dis. 2007; 17(4):629–635.
Blanchard CM, Rodgers WM, Courneya KS, Daub B, Black B. Self-efficacy and mood in cardiac rehabilitation: Should gender be considered? Behav Med. 2002; 27(4):149–160.
Rogers LQ, Shah P, Dunnington G, et al. Social cognitive theory and physical activity during breast cancer treatment. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005; 32(4):807–815.
Doerksen SE, Umstattd MR, McAuley E. Social cognitive determinants of moderate and vigorous physical activity in college freshmen. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2009; 39(5):1201–1213.
Rogers LQ, McAuley E, Courneya KS, Verhulst SJ. Correlates of physical activity self-efficacy among breast cancer survivors. Am J Health Behav. 2008; 32(6):594–603.
Lewis CE, Raczynski JM, Heath GW, et al. Promoting physical activity in low-income African-American communities: The PARR project. Ethn Dis. 1993; 3(2):106–118.
Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus. 1998–2006.
Enders CK. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychol Methods. 2001; 6(4):352–370.
Enders CK, Bandalos DL. The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equat Model. 2001; 8:430–457.
Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE. Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1996.
Little RS. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988; 83(404):1198–1204.
Bentler PM, Yuan KH. Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivar Behav Res. 1999; 34(2):181–197.
Rogers LQ, Markwell S, Hopkins-Price P, et al. Reduced barriers mediated physical activity maintenance among breast cancer survivors. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011; 33(2):235–254.
Vallance JK, Courneya KS, Plotnikoff RC, Mackey JR. Analyzing theoretical mechanisms of physical activity behavior change in breast cancer survivors: Results from the activity promotion (ACTION) trial. Ann Behav Med. 2008; 35(2):150–158.
Cerin E, Mackinnon DP A commentary on current practice in mediating variable analyses in behavioural nutrition and physical activity. Public Health Nutr. 2009; 12(8):1182–1188.
Schwarzer R, Schuz B, Ziegelmann JP, et al. Adoption and maintenance of four health behaviors: Theory-guided longitudinal studies on dental flossing, seat belt use, dietary behavior, and physical activity. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 33(2):156–166.
Stanton AL, Luecken LJ, MacKinnon DP, Thompson EH. Mechanisms in psychosocial interventions for adults living with cancer: Opportunity for integration of theory, research, and practice. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013; 81(2):318–335.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the contributions of Karen Hoelzer, MD, Sara Mansfield, MS, Amanda Fogleman, MEng, Ruth Sosnoff, PhD, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine Center for Clinical Research, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign kinesiology graduate students and assistants, and the University of Alabama at Birmingham Physical Activity core (P30DK056336). This project was supported by the National Cancer Institute R01CA136859. Kerry S. Courneya is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Authors’ Statement of Conflict of Interest and Adherence to Ethical Standards Authors
Laura Rogers and all contributing authors declare they have no conflict of interest. All procedures, including the informed consent process, were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.
Additional information
This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute R01CA136859 (Dr. Rogers). Dr. Kerry S. Courneya is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program.
About this article
Cite this article
Rogers, L.Q., Courneya, K.S., Anton, P.M. et al. Social Cognitive Constructs Did Not Mediate the BEAT Cancer Intervention Effects on Objective Physical Activity Behavior Based on Multivariable Path Analysis. ann. behav. med. 51, 321–326 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9840-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9840-6