Skip to main content
Log in

Social Cognitive Constructs Did Not Mediate the BEAT Cancer Intervention Effects on Objective Physical Activity Behavior Based on Multivariable Path Analysis

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Most breast cancer survivors do not meet physical activity recommendations. Understanding mediators of physical activity behavior change can improve interventions designed to increase physical activity in this at-risk population.

Purpose

Study aims were to determine the 3-month Better Exercise Adherence after Treatment for Cancer (BEAT Cancer) behavior change intervention effects on social cognitive theory constructs and the mediating role of any changes on the increase in accelerometer-measured physical activity previously reported.

Methods

Post-treatment breast cancer survivors (N = 222) were randomized to BEAT Cancer or usual care. Assessments occurred at baseline, 3 months (M3), and 6 months (M6). Adjusted linear mixed model analysis of variance determined intervention effects on walking self-efficacy, outcome expectations, goal setting, and perceived barrier interference at M3. Path analysis determined mediation of intervention effects on physical activity at M6 by changes in social cognitive constructs during the intervention (i.e., baseline to M3).

Results

BEAT Cancer significantly improved self-efficacy, goals, negative outcome expectations, and barriers. Total path analysis model explained 24 % of the variance in M6 physical activity. There were significant paths from randomized intervention group to self-efficacy (β = 0.15, p < .05) and barriers (β = −0.22, p < .01). Barriers demonstrated a borderline significant association with M6 physical activity (β = −0.24, p = .05). No statistically significant indirect effects were found.

Conclusions

Although BEAT Cancer significantly improved social cognitive constructs, no significant indirect effects on physical activity improvements 3 months post-intervention were observed (NCT00929617).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Schmid D, Leitzmann MF. Association between physical activity and mortality among breast cancer and colorectal cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25(7):1293–1311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Speck RM, Courneya KS, Masse LC, Duval S, Schmitz KH. An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2010; 4(2):87–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bodai BI, Tuso P. Breast cancer survivorship: A comprehensive review of long-term medical issues and lifestyle recommendations. Perm J. 2015; 19(2):48–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Demark-Wahnefried W, Rogers LQ, Alfano CM, et al. Practical clinical interventions for diet, physical activity, and weight control in cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65(3):167–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blanchard CM, Courneya KS, Stein K. Cancer survivors’ adherence to lifestyle behavior recommendations and associations with health-related quality of life: Results from the American Cancer Society’s SCS-II. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(13):2198–2204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stacey FG, James EL, Chapman K, Courneya KS, Lubans DR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2014.

  7. Young MD, Plotnikoff RC, Collins CE, Callister R, Morgan PJ. Social cognitive theory and physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2014; 15(12):983–995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Belanger-Gravel A, Godin G, Vezina-Im LA, Amireault S, Poirier P. The effect of theory-based interventions on physical activity participation among overweight/obese individuals: A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2011; 12(6):430–439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prestwich A, Sniehotta FF, Whittington C, et al. Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2014; 33(5):465–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers LQ, Courneya KS, Anton PM, et al. Effects of the BEAT Cancer physical activity behavior change intervention on physical activity, aerobic fitness, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 149(1):109–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers LQ, McAuley E, Anton PM, et al. Better exercise adherence after treatment for cancer (BEAT Cancer) study: Rationale, design, and methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012; 33(1):124–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. USDHHS. 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McAuley E, Mihalko SL. Advances in Sports and Exercise Psychology Measurement. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology, Inc., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maddux JE (ed): Self-efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment: Theory, Research, and Application. New York: Plenum Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Short CE, James EL, Stacey F, Plotnikoff RC. A qualitative synthesis of trials promoting physical activity behaviour change among post-treatment breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2013; 7(4):570–581.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodgers WM, Murray TC, Selzler AM, Norman P. Development and impact of exercise self-efficacy types during and after cardiac rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2013; 58(2):178–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers LQ, McAuley E, Courneya KS, Humphries MC, Gutin B. Racial differences in physical activity associations among primary care patients. Ethn Dis. 2007; 17(4):629–635.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Blanchard CM, Rodgers WM, Courneya KS, Daub B, Black B. Self-efficacy and mood in cardiac rehabilitation: Should gender be considered? Behav Med. 2002; 27(4):149–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rogers LQ, Shah P, Dunnington G, et al. Social cognitive theory and physical activity during breast cancer treatment. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005; 32(4):807–815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Doerksen SE, Umstattd MR, McAuley E. Social cognitive determinants of moderate and vigorous physical activity in college freshmen. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2009; 39(5):1201–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogers LQ, McAuley E, Courneya KS, Verhulst SJ. Correlates of physical activity self-efficacy among breast cancer survivors. Am J Health Behav. 2008; 32(6):594–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lewis CE, Raczynski JM, Heath GW, et al. Promoting physical activity in low-income African-American communities: The PARR project. Ethn Dis. 1993; 3(2):106–118.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus. 1998–2006.

  25. Enders CK. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychol Methods. 2001; 6(4):352–370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Enders CK, Bandalos DL. The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equat Model. 2001; 8:430–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE. Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Little RS. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988; 83(404):1198–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bentler PM, Yuan KH. Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivar Behav Res. 1999; 34(2):181–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rogers LQ, Markwell S, Hopkins-Price P, et al. Reduced barriers mediated physical activity maintenance among breast cancer survivors. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011; 33(2):235–254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Vallance JK, Courneya KS, Plotnikoff RC, Mackey JR. Analyzing theoretical mechanisms of physical activity behavior change in breast cancer survivors: Results from the activity promotion (ACTION) trial. Ann Behav Med. 2008; 35(2):150–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cerin E, Mackinnon DP A commentary on current practice in mediating variable analyses in behavioural nutrition and physical activity. Public Health Nutr. 2009; 12(8):1182–1188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schwarzer R, Schuz B, Ziegelmann JP, et al. Adoption and maintenance of four health behaviors: Theory-guided longitudinal studies on dental flossing, seat belt use, dietary behavior, and physical activity. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 33(2):156–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stanton AL, Luecken LJ, MacKinnon DP, Thompson EH. Mechanisms in psychosocial interventions for adults living with cancer: Opportunity for integration of theory, research, and practice. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013; 81(2):318–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of Karen Hoelzer, MD, Sara Mansfield, MS, Amanda Fogleman, MEng, Ruth Sosnoff, PhD, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine Center for Clinical Research, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign kinesiology graduate students and assistants, and the University of Alabama at Birmingham Physical Activity core (P30DK056336). This project was supported by the National Cancer Institute R01CA136859. Kerry S. Courneya is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Q. Rogers MD, MPH.

Ethics declarations

Authors’ Statement of Conflict of Interest and Adherence to Ethical Standards Authors

Laura Rogers and all contributing authors declare they have no conflict of interest. All procedures, including the informed consent process, were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute R01CA136859 (Dr. Rogers). Dr. Kerry S. Courneya is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rogers, L.Q., Courneya, K.S., Anton, P.M. et al. Social Cognitive Constructs Did Not Mediate the BEAT Cancer Intervention Effects on Objective Physical Activity Behavior Based on Multivariable Path Analysis. ann. behav. med. 51, 321–326 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9840-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9840-6

Keywords

Navigation