Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical investigations of the cone-shaped vortex finders on the performance of cyclone separators

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Performance analysis of 0.29 m diameter cyclone separator was done for cone shaped vortex finders having different in-built tapered angles varying from 0.0°-10.0° in steps of 2.5° at different inlet velocities using Fluent 15.0. Increasing the angle from 0.0° to 10.0° at the lowest inlet velocity decreases the Stokes number (Stk50), which represents the cut-size of a cyclone separator, by 22.1 % at an expense of significant increase in Euler number (Eu), representing the dimensionless pressure drop, by nearly 46.3 %, whereas at the highest inlet velocity of 25 m/s, the Stk50 decreases by 26.1 % and the increase in Eu lowers to 34.3 %. Beyond a critical angle of orientation, 5.0°, a recirculation zone of increasing magnitude develops inside the vortex finder. The axial velocity, tangential velocity, and pressure drop across the cyclone have been validated against published literature; a grid independence test was also done successfully.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Sung et al., Highly efficient in–line wet cyclone air sampler for airborne virus detection, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31 (9) (2017) 4363–4369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Mothilal and K. Pitchandi, Influence of inlet velocity of air and solid particle feed rate on holdup mass and heat transfer characteristics in cyclone heat exchanger, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29 (10) (2015) 4509–4518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. C. Hoffmann and L. E. Stein, Gas cyclones and swirl tubes: Principles. Design and Operation, 2nd Ed., Springer (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Elsayed and C. Lacor, The effect of cyclone vortex finder dimensions on the flow pattern and performance using LES, Computers & Fluids, 71 (2013) 224–239.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. L. S. Brar, R. P. Sharma and R. Dwivedi, Effect of vortex finder diameter on flow field and collection efficiency of cyclone separators, Particulate Science and Technology, 33 (1) (2014) 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. S. Brar, R. P. Sharma and K. Elsayed, The effect of the cyclone length on the performance of Stairmand highefficiency cyclone, Powder Technology, 286 (2015) 668–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Avci et al., Experimental investigation of the natural vortex length in tangential inlet cyclones, Separation Science and Technology, 48 (1) (2013) 122–126.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. L. S. Brar and R. P. Sharma, Effect of varying diameter on the performance of industrial scale gas cyclone dust separators, Materials Today: Proceedings, 2 (4–5) (2015) 3230–3237.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Wasilewski and L. S. Brar, Optimization of the geometry of cyclone separators used in clinker burning process: A case study, Powder Technology, 313 (2017) 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. M. El–Batsh, Improving cyclone performance by proper selection of the exit pipe, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37 (7) (2013) 5286–5303.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. K. Elsayed and C. Lacor, Numerical modeling of the flow field and performance in cyclones of different cone–tip diameters, Computers & Fluids, 51 (1) (2011) 48–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Elsayed and C. Lacor, The effect of cyclone inlet dimensions on the flow pattern and performance, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35 (4) (2011) 1952–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L. S. Brar and K. Elsayed, Analysis and optimization of multi–inlet gas cyclones using large eddy simulation and artificial neural network, Powder Technology, 311 (2017) 465–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. N. Farahani et al., Effects of using ribs on flow pattern and performance of cyclone separators, Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 5 (2) (2011) 180–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Kępa, The influence of a plate vortex limiter on cyclone separator, Separation Science and Technology, 51 (9) (2016) 1566–1578.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Raoufi et al., Numerical simulation and optimization of fluid flow in cyclone vortex finder, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 47 (1) (2008) 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. K. S. Lim, H. S. Kim and K. W. Lee, Characteristics of the collection efficiency for a cyclone with different vortex finder shapes, J. of Aerosol Science, 35 (6) (2004) 743–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Morsi and A. J. Alexander, An investigation of particle trajectories in two–phase flow systems, J. Fluid Mech., 55 (2) (1972) 193–208.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Elsayed and C. Lacor, The effect of the dust outlet geometry on the performance and hydrodynamics of gas cyclones, Computers & Fluids, 68 (2012) 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C. J. Stairmand, The design and performance of cyclone separators, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 29 (1951) 356–383.

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. S. Brar, R. P. Sharma and R. Dwivedi, Effect of vortex finder diameter on flow field and collection efficiency of cyclone separators, Particulate Science and Technology, 33 (1) (2015) 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. E. Kashani, A. Mohebbi and M. G. Heidari, CFD simulation of the preheater cyclone of a cement plant and the optimization of its performance using a combination of the design of experiments and multi–gene genetic programming, Powder Technology, 327 (2018) 430–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S. K. Shukla, P. Shukla and P. Ghosh, Evaluation of numerical schemes for dispersed phase modeling of cyclone separators, Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 5 (2) (2011) 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. J. Hoekstra, Gas flow field and collection efficiency of cyclone separators, Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Sarpkaya, On stationary and travelling vortex breakdowns, J. of Fluid Mechanics, 45 (3) (1971) 545–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. T. O'Doherty et al., Experimental analysis of rotating instabilities in swirling and cyclonic flows, Asia–Pacific J. of Chemical Engineering, 7 (3–4) (1999) 245–267.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. J. Derksen, Simulations of confined turbulent vortex flow, Computers & Fluids, 34 (3) (2005) 301–318.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. N. Syred and J. M. Beer, Combustion in swirling flows: A review, Combustion and flame, 23 (2) (1974) 143–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S. Leibovich, The structure of vortex breakdown, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 10 (1) (1978) 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kailash Jha.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Donghyun You

Vikash Kumar is a Research Scholar in Mechanical Engineering at Indian Institute of Technology (ISM) Dhanbad. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D. under the guidance of Dr. Kailash Jha. His research field is computational fluid dynamics, design optimization.

Kailash Jha is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering of Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad. His research areas are computer aided geometrical modeling, feature recognition, pipe network analysis, and fluid flow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, V., Jha, K. Numerical investigations of the cone-shaped vortex finders on the performance of cyclone separators. J Mech Sci Technol 32, 5293–5303 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-1028-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-1028-5

Keywords

Navigation