Abstract
The use of aluminum in automobile bodies has increased in recent years due to its various advantages. However, the research conducted on the fatigue performance of aluminum arc welding is limited. This study conducts 6061-T6 aluminum GMAW experiments for the various weld geometries to determine their effect on the fatigue performance. These weld geometries, which include full penetration, partial penetration, welding with misalignment, different toe angles, and double butt joints, are obtained by controlling the welding conditions. Full penetration presents the best fatigue performance, and the toe angle exhibits a relatively minimal effect on fatigue performance. Misalignment causes a large reduction in the fatigue performance. In the partial penetration and double butt joint case, the non-welded part, where the stress is concentrated, is located at the bottom. Therefore, these two cases present a relatively lower fatigue performance. In the automobile production process, the use of a backing plate is limited; therefore, controlling the penetration depth significantly improves the fatigue performance, despite the difficulty in obtaining the desired penetration depth. Double butt joints present the advantage of penetration depth control; therefore, a double butt joint can be considered as an appropriate alternative solution for full penetration despite the additional cost involved in the double butt joint preparation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Cho, Weldability increase of aluminum by variable polarity arc, Journal of Welding and Joining, 32(1) (2014) 108–111.
J. Cho, J. J. Lee and S. H. Bae, Heat input analysis of variable polarity arc welding of aluminum, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81 (2015) 1273–1280.
H. Jeong, K. Park, S. Baek and J. Cho, Thermal efficiency decision of variable polarity aluminum arc welding through molten pool analysis, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 138 (2019) 729–737.
D. R. Askeland and W. J. Wright, Essentials of Materials Science and Engineering, 4th ed., Cengage Learning, Boston, USA (2019) 245–247.
E. Patrick and M. Sharp, Joining aluminum auto body structure, SAE Technical Paper 920282 (1992).
R. S. Florea, D. J. Bammann, A. Yeldell, K. N. Solanki and Y. Hammi, Welding parameters influence on fatigue life and microstructure in resistance spot welding of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy, Materials and Design, 45 (2013) 456–465.
A. Gean, S. A. Westgate, J. C. Kucza and J. C. Ehrstrom, Static and fatigue behavior of spot-welded 51 82-0 aluminum alloy sheet, Welding Journal-New York, 78(3) (1999) 80s–86s.
K. V. Jata, K. K. Sankara and J. J. Ruschau, Friction stir welding effects on microstructure and fatigue of aluminum alloy 7050-T7451, Metallurgical and Materials Transaction A, 31 (2000) 2181–2192.
M. N. Ilman, Kusmono and P. T. Iswanto, Fatigue crack growth rate behaviour of friction-stir aluminium alloy AA2024-T3 welds under transient thermal tensioning, Materials and Design, 50 (2013) 235–243.
G. D’Urso, C. Giardini, S. Lorenzi and T. Pastore, Fatigue crack growth in the welding nugget of FSW joints of a 6060 aluminum alloy, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 214(10) (2014) 2075–2084.
D. G. Moghadam and K. Farhangdoost, Influence of welding parameters on fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth rate in friction stir welded nugget of 2024-T351 aluminum alloy joints, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 26(10) (2016) 2567–2585.
D. A. Wang and C. H. Chen, Fatigue lives of friction stir spot welds in aluminum 6061-T6 sheets, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(1) (2009) 367–375.
Y. E. Ma, Z. C. Xia, R. R. Jiang and W. Y. Li, Effect of welding parameters on mechanical and fatigue properties of friction stir welded 2198 T8 aluminum-lithium alloy joints, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 114 (2013) 1–11.
P. C. Lin, J. Pan and T. Pan, Failure modes and fatigue life estimations of spot friction welds in lap-shear specimens of aluminum 6111-T4 sheets, part 2: welds made by a flat tool, International Journal of Fatigue, 30(1) (2008) 90–105.
H. R. Ghazvinloo, A. Honarbakhsh-Raouf and N. Shadfar, Effect of arc voltage, welding current and welding speed on fatigue life, impact energy and bead penetration of AA6061 joints produced by robotic MIG welding, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2) (2010) 156–162.
Y. Gori and R. P. Verma, Experimental fatigue life estimation of AA5083 aluminium alloys welded by two welding processes-gas metal arc (GMA) welding and friction stir welding (FSW), Journal of Graphic Era University, 5(1) (2017) 10–15.
J. da Silva, J. M. Costa, A. Loureiro and J. M. Ferreira, Fatigue behaviour of AA6082-T6 MIG welded butt joints improved by friction stir processing, Materials and Design, 51 (2013) 315–322.
C. Zhang, M. Gao and X. Zeng, Effect of microstructural characteristics on high cycle fatigue properties of laser-arc hybrid welded AA6082 aluminum alloy, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 231 (2016) 479–487.
Y. Qiao, H. Zhang, L. Zhao and Q. Feng, Fatigue crack growth properties of AA 5754 aluminum alloy gas tungsten arc welding and friction stir welding joints, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 29 (2020) 2113–2124.
J. M. Kuk, K. C. Jang, D. G. Lee and I. S. Kim, Effects of temperature and shielding gas mixture on fatigue life of 5083 aluminum alloy, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 155–156(30) (2004) 1408–1414.
P. Livieri and P. lazzarin, Fatigue strength of steel and aluminium welded joints based on generalised stress intensity factors and local strain energy values, International Journal of Fracture, 133 (2005) 247–276.
S. W. Han, H. J. Lee and S. R. Lee, Fatigue strength evaluation of butt-welded aluminum alloy component for railway vehicles, Processing of Spring Conference of Korean Society for Railway (2020) 242–249.
N. L. Person, Fatigue of aluminum alloy welded joints, Weld Journal, 50(2) (1971) 77s–87s.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No.2021R1A4A1033141) and (No.2021R1F1A1064238).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Jungho Cho received his Ph.D. at KAIST in 2007 and now he is a faculty of Chung-buk National University after working at Hyundai Motors and Ohio State University, USA for several years. His major is development of welding and joining techniques, welding physics and thermo-dynamical analysis of weld pool.
Sang-Woo Han is a visiting scholar of Research Institute of Industrial Science & Technology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from KAIST. His research interests include arc welding, laser processing, and numerical simulation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Han, SW., Lee, G., Kim, H. et al. Effect of weld geometry on fatigue performance of 6061-T6 aluminum GMAW: part 1. Butt joint. J Mech Sci Technol 36, 5201–5208 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-0932-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-0932-x