Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Voter empowerment for emerging democracies: Mobilising the marginalised in Peru

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motivating the politically and economically disenfranchised to vote can be problematic, particularly in the emerging democracies where political marketing is gaining ground without concurrent voter education. Utilising textual and discourse analysis this paper deconstructs a social marketing campaign in Peru where the rhetoric of political candidature is challenged. Through characterising voters as employers and selection criteria based on analogies of daily life, the political process is made comprehensible and accessible, if not also radically appealing. The author introduces voter empowerment as a concept positioned in the interstices between social marketing and political communications, and distinct from political marketing. Comparative studies of similar campaigns are needed to demonstrate whether these may prove effective and how much adaptation is needful cross-nationally. Meanwhile the Peru campaign provides policy-makers and social activists elsewhere with a model for communicating creatively with marginalised citizens about exercising their democratic rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrajano, M. A. (2005). Who evaluates a presidential candidate by using non-policy campaign message. Political Research Quarterly, 58(1), 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, M. A., Lodhi, S. A., & Shahzad, M. N. (2011). Political brand: trusting a candidate in the age of mistrust. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 5(2), 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. J., & Beramendi, P. (2012). Left parties, poor voters, and electoral participation in advanced industrial societies. Comparative Political Studies, 45(6), 714–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, A. R. (2002). Marketing social marketing in the social change marketplace. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 21(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argurto, J. (2008). Peru. In C. Mikkelsen (Ed.), The Indigenous World 2009. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs: Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baines, P. R. (2003). Voter segmentation and candidate position. In B. I. Newman (Ed.), Handbook of Political Marketing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, P. A., Dalton, R. J., Greene, S., & Huckfeldt, R. (2002). The social calculus of voting: interpersonal, media, and organizational influences on presidential choices. The American Political Science Review, 96(1), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (1998). Shame, guilt and responses to non-profit and public sector ads. International Journal of Advertising, 17(4), 483–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. A. (2013). Media analysis techniques. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E. M. (1997). Dealing with cynical citizens. Public Administration Review, 57(March/April), 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, L., & Binney, W. (2010). Fear, guilt, and shame appeals in social marketing. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

  • Burchell, K., Rettie, R., & Patel, K. (2013). Marketing social norms: social marketing and the ‘social norm approach’. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 12(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, P., & Collins, N. (1994). Political marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 28(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabretta, R. (2012). Doparies: A novel party deliberative and aggregative decision-making mechanism to improve the quality of representative democracy. Sage Open. Retrieved 12 May 2014 from http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/12/29/2158244011433699.

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Personality profiles and political parties. Political Psychology, 20, 175–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conaghan, C. M. (2005). Fujimori’s Peru: Deception in the Public Sphere. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cwalina, W., Falkowski, A., & Newman, B. I. (2011). Political Marketing: Theoretical and Strategic Foundations. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA Factbook (2011). Peru. Washington: Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved 26 July 2012 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pe.html.

  • Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dann, S., Harris, P., Mort, G. S., Fry, M.‐. L., & Binney, W. (2007). Reigniting the fire: a contemporary research agenda for social, political and nonprofit marketing. Journal of Public Affairs, 7(3), 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., & Mian, T. (2010). The reputation of the party leader and of the party being led. European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2002). The Qualitative Inquiry Reader. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dev, C. S., & Schultz, D. E. (2005). In the mix: a customer-focused approach can bring the current marketing mix into the 21st century. Marketing Management, 14(1), 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). Archaeology of Knowledge [Translated from French by AM Sheridan Smith]. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti, A. & Mattozzi, A. (2008). Personal influence. Social Context and Political Competition. Retrieved 02 August 2011 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=057681 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1057681.

  • Galindo, P. P. (2010). Political marketing in a weak democracy? The Peruvian case. In Lees-Marshment, Jennifer; Strömbäck, Jesper and Rudd, Chris (eds.) Global Political Marketing. London: Routledge.

  • Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R., & Dryzek, J. (1980). Rational participation: the politics of relative power. British Journal of Political Science, 10(3), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. (2012). Re-thinking and re-tooling the social marketing mix. Australasian Marketing Journal, 20(2), 122–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1994). From marketing mix to relationship marketing: towards a paradigm shift in marketing. Management Decision, 32(2), 4–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1993/1962). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Hall, J. A. (2010). The campus, the community and voter mobilization. National Civic Review, 99(2), 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardina, D. (2006). Strategies for citizen participation and empowerment in non-profit, community-based organizations. Community Development, 37(4), 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrop, M. (1990). Political Marketing, Parliamentary Affairs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, G., MacFadyen, L., & Anderson, S. (2000). Whose behavior is it anyway? The broader potential of social marketing. Social Marketing Quarterly, 6(2), 46–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henneberg, S. C. (2004). The views of an advocatus dei: political marketing and its critics. Journal of Public Affairs, 4(3), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interview with agency (2007). Creative director and members of the campaign team, Toronja Integrated Communication Agency, Lima, Peru (March).

  • Interview with executives (2007). International MBA class, Centro de Negocios, Pontificia Universidad Catolica Peru, Lima (March).

  • Interview with press (2007). Editor and reporters, El Comercio newspaper, Lima, Peru (March).

  • Karim, L. (2001). Politics of the poor? NGOs and grass‐roots political mobilization in Bangladesh. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 24(1), 92–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp, J. A., & Banducci, S. A. (2008). Political efficacy and participation in twenty-seven democracies: how electoral systems shape political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Kotler, N. (1999). Political marketing: generating effective candidates, campaigns and causes. In B. I. Newman (Ed.), Handbook of Political Marketing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: an approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees-Marshment, J. (Ed.). (2012). Routledge Handbook of Political Marketing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees-Marshment, J., & Lilleker, D. G. (2012). Knowledge sharing and lesson learning: consultants’ perspectives on the international sharing of political marketing strategy. Contemporary Politics, 18(3), 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees-Marshment, J., Strömbäck, J., & Rudd, C. (Eds.). (2010). Global Political Marketing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppaniemi, M., Karjaluoto, H., Lehto, H., & Goman, A. (2010). Targeting young voters in a political campaign: empirical insights into an interactive digital marketing campaign in the 2007 Finnish general election. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 22, 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luca, M. (2010). Consensus and democratic legitimacy: political marketing versus political philosophy. Hamburg Review of Social Sciences, 5, 62–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarek, P. J. (2011). Campaign Communication and Political Marketing. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E., Russell Neuman, W., & Mackuen, M. (2000). Affective Intelligence and Political Judgement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, A. (2003). Marketing political soap: a political marketing view of selling candidates like soap, of electioneering as a ritual, and of electoral military analogies. Journal of Public Affairs, 3(2), 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, C. (2006). An unlikely comeback in Peru. Journal of Democracy, 17(4), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, M. L. (2005). Candidate occupations and voter information shortcuts. Journal of Politics, 67(1), 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah, K. (2010). Political marketing in Ghana. In J. Lees-Marchment, J. Strömbäck, & C. Rudd (Eds.), Global Political Marketing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, C. (2002). NGOs, civil society and democratization: a critical review of the literature. Progress in Development Studies, 2(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moufahim, M., & Lim, M. (2009). Towards a critical marketing agenda? Journal of Marketing Management, 25(7/8), 763–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, R., Nevitte, N., Gidengil, E., & Blais, A. (2008). Election campaigns as information campaigns: who learns what and does it matter? Political Communication, 25, 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, B. I., & Sheth, J. N. (1987). A Theory of Political Choice Behaviour. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, S. P., Pantoja, A., & Segura, G. M. (2006). Political knowledge and issue voting among the Latino electorate. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, D. W. (2008). Is voting contagious? Evidence from two field experiments. The American Political Science Review, 102(1), 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, R. G., Weisberg, H. F. (2001). Introduction. In Controversies in Voting Behavior, (4th edn.). Washington: CQ Press.

  • Niven, D. (2004). The mobilization solution? Face‐to‐face contact and voter turnout in a municipal election. Journal of Politics, 66(3), 868–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Cass, A. (1996). Political marketing and the marketing concept. European Journal of Marketing, 30(10/11), 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy, N. (2001). The marketing of political marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 35(9/10), 1047–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy, N. (1996). Social propaganda and social marketing: a critical difference? European Journal of Marketing, 30(10/11), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peattie, S., & Peattie, K. (2003). Ready to fly solo? Reducing social marketing’s dependence on commercial marketing theory. Marketing Theory, 3(3), 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, N., & Hackley, C. (2009). Are voters, consumers? A qualitative exploration of the voter-consumer analogy in political marketing. Qualitative Market Research, 12(2), 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, G. (2000). Semiotic analysis of still images. In M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. M., Reynolds, T. J., & Reynolds, K. (2010). Decision-based voter segmentation: an application for campaign message development. European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 310–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, S. L. (1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, S. L., & Dimock, M. A. (1999). Political knowledge and citizen competence. In S. L. Elkin & K. E. Soltan (Eds.), Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions. University Park: Pennsylvania State Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raftopoulou, E., & Hogg, M. K. (2010). The political role of government-sponsored social marketing campaigns. European Journal of Marketing, 44(78), 1206–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Solving the puzzle of participation in electoral politics. In R. G. Niemi & D. C. Kimball (Eds.), Controversies in Voting Behavior. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryfe, D. M. (2005). Does deliberative democracy work? Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, L., Thelen, S. T., & Sherman, E. (2010). Interpersonal and political trust: modelling levels of citizens’ trust. European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solt, F. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toronja (2006). Prueba Ciudadana. Lima, Peru: Toronja Agencia de Communication Integral. Retrieved 30 May 2009 from http://www.toronja.pe/v2/prueba.htm.

  • Uhlaner, C. J. (1986). Political participation, rational actors, and rationality: a new approach. Political Psychology, 7(3), 551–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. B., & Newman, B. I. (Eds.). (2013). Political Marketing in Retrospective and Prospective. London: Routlege.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011). Peru overview. Retrieved 27 June 2012 from http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/peru/overview.

  • Wymer, W. (2010). Rethinking the boundaries of social marketing: activism or advertising? Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K. (2012). Increasing citizen demand for good government in Kenya. [Accessed in November 2014 at http://cega.berkeley.edu/assets/cega_events/4/]

  • Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science (pp. 308–319). Libraries Unlimited: Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stockholm University, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden

    Amos Owen Thomas

Authors
  1. Amos Owen Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amos Owen Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, A.O. Voter empowerment for emerging democracies: Mobilising the marginalised in Peru. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 13, 239–263 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-015-0148-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-015-0148-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation