Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrogeochemistry of tunnel seepage water along the contact of zone of metasedimentary and granitic rock within the Pahang–Selangor Raw Water Transfer Tunnel Project, Malaysia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater obtained from water inflows during the excavation of the Pahang–Selangor Raw Water Transfer Tunnel (P-SRWTT) was analyzed to determine the characteristics of groundwater that flows along the main range granite and the metasedimentary geological boundary. A total of 61 tunnel seepage water (TSW) samples were immediately obtained after tunnel excavation. Hydrogeochemical analyses, including physicochemical and major ion analyses, were performed on TSW samples. Results show that the TSW sample in the P-SRWTT is meteoric water, which infiltrates at different elevations and flow paths. The prolonged interactions of groundwater in the metasedimentary rock and contact zones produced Ca2+–HCO3 –SO4 2−, Ca2+–HCO3 , and Ca2+–Na+–HCO3 in the water. Electrical conductivity (EC) values reach as high as 345.80 and 313.22 μs/cm in the metasedimentary rock and contact zones, respectively. Most water in these two zones present temperatures lower than 30 °C, which is comparable with the expected geothermal gradient of 35 °C/km. Ca2+–Na+–HCO3 is the dominant water type in the granite zone with an average EC of 288.37 μs/cm. Na+–HCO3 waters are generated through the interaction between Ca2+–HCO3 and Na+ in granitic rocks. The zone of warm Na+–HCO3 waters, presenting an average temperature of 35 °C at an overburden of more than 400 m, shows some anomalies from the expected geothermal gradient of 35°/km. The hydrogeochemistry analyses provide a good understanding of the complex hydrogeological system at the two major geological formations along the tunnel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bahri F, Saibi H (2010) Characterisation, classification, and evaluation of some groundwater samples in the Mostaganem area of northwestern Algeria. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-009-0062-0

  • Chae GT, Yun ST, Kim SR, Hahn C (2001) Hydrogeochemistry of seepage water collected within the Yeongcheon diversion tunnel, Korea: source and evolution of SO4 2− rich groundwater in sedimentary terrain. Hydrol Process 15:1565–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dar FA, Perrin J, Ahmed S, Narayana AC, Riotte J (2015) Hydrogeochemical characteristics of karst aquifer from a semi-arid region of southern India and impact of rainfall recharge on groundwater chemistry. Arab J Geosci 8(5):2739–2750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vallejo LG, Ferrer M (2009) Geological engineering. CRC Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Domenico PA, Schwartz FW (1998) Physical and chemical hydrogeology, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Fiky AA (2009) Hydrogeochemical characteristics and evolution of groundwater at the Ras Sudr-Abu Zenima area, Southwest Sinai, Egypt. Earth Sci 21(1):79–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2012) Conductivity [Online], http://water.epa.gov/type/rsl/monitoring/vms59.cfm [Accessed on 14 April 2013].

  • Fatta D, Papapoulos A, Loizidou M (1999) A study on the landfill leachate and its impact on the groundwater quality of the greater area. Environ Geochem Health 21:175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeze AR, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater, 1st edn. Pearson Education Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, pp 241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison CS, Tan DNK (2009) Geology of Peninsular Malaysia. Universiti Malaya and the Geological Society, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Juned AS, Arjun BB (2011) Analysis of chloride, sodium and potassium in groundwater samples of Nanded City in Mahabharata India. Eur J Exp Biol 1(1)

  • Kehew AE (2006) Geology for engineers and environmental scientists, 3rd edn. Pearson Education Inc., Prentice Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • KeTTHA (2014) Completion Report, Pahang-Selangor Raw Water Transfer Project, Lot 1-1. Water Transfer Tunnel, Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel R, Voigt HJ, Wendland F, Hanneppel S (2004) Behavior and effect of natural and anthropogenic groundwater pollutants relevant for determination of groundwater threshold values. Environment 47:204

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong CS (2010) Ground water studies using geophysical techniques and hydrochemistry method at Kerian irrigation scheme. B. Eng. Dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia

  • Marechal JC, Etcheverry D (2003) The use of 3H and 18O tracers to characterize water inflows in Alpine tunnels. Appl Geochem 18:339–351. doi:10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00101-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore RD, Richards G, Story A (2008) Electrical conductivity as an indicator of water chemistry and hydrologic process, Streamline Watershed Management Bulletin Vol. 11/No. 2 Spring.

  • MPCA (2009) Barium, beryllium, calcium, magnesium and strontium in Minnesota’s groundwater. M.P.C. Agency, Minnesota, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochsenkuhn KMJ, Kontoyannakos J, Ochsenkuhn PM (1997) A new approach to a hydrochemical study of groundwater flow. J Hydrol 194:64–75. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03218-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver GJH, Palmer AC, Tijawi H, Zulkifli H (2011) Part A: civil & structural engineering. Engineered geothermal power systems for Singapore. IES Journal. doi:10.1080/19373260.2011.598261.

  • Pastorelli S, Marini L, Hunziker J (2001) Chemistry, isotope values (δD, δ18O, δ34SSO4) and temperatures of the water inflows in two Gotthard tunnels, Swiss Alps. Appl Geochem 16:633–649. doi:10.1016/S0883-2927(00)00056-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sappa G, Barbieri M, Ergul S, Ferranti F (2012) Hydrogeological conceptual model of groundwater from carbonate aquifers using environmental isotopes (18O, 2H) and chemical tracers: a case study in southern Latium Region, Central Italy. Journal of Water Resource and Protection. doi:10.4236/jwarp.2012.49080.

  • Simpson H, Conant B, Myslik J (2006) Groundwater: an important rural resource understanding groundwater, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Ontario, Order No. 6, 111

  • Tadesse N, Bheemalingeswara K, Abdul Aziz M (2010) Hydrogeological investigation and groundwater potential assessment in Haromaya watershed, Eastern Ethiopia. Momona Ethiopian J Sci 2(1):26–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuri T (2008) Detailed engineering design report. Part 5: water transfer tunnel. Tokyo Electric Power Services Co. Ltd, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance and cooperation given by the KeTTHA (Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water, Malaysia) and the Tokyo Electric Power Services Co., Ltd. (TEPSCO) to successfully conduct this study. This research was supported by the Exploratory Research Grant Scheme by The Ministry of Education Malaysia (ERGS): The Study of Tunnel Seepage Water (TSW) as a Potential for Groundwater Characterization across the Titiwangsa Main Range, Malaysia, Grant No. 203/PAWAM/6730120.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharifah Farah Fariza Syed Zainal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zainal, S.F.F.S., Ismail, M.A.M., Mostafa, R. et al. Hydrogeochemistry of tunnel seepage water along the contact of zone of metasedimentary and granitic rock within the Pahang–Selangor Raw Water Transfer Tunnel Project, Malaysia. Arab J Geosci 9, 265 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2260-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2260-2

Keywords

Navigation