Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability and validity of the translated Chinese version of Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (2–5 years)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Early autism screening is of great value, but there is lack of a screening tool of early age (2–5 years) in China. The Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (ASRS, 2–5 years) is a newly developed autism screening tool in the USA. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the translated Chinese version of ASRS (C_ASRS) in Chinese children population before its application in China for early autism screening.

Methods

Caregivers of general children aged 2–5 years from 17 kindergartens and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) cases from five special education schools in five cities were recruited to complete the C_ASRS. 1910 valid questionnaires from kindergarteners and 192 from ASD cases were included for analyses.

Results

The item reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) was more than 0.80 in the screening scale and DSM-5 scale, and 0.51–0.81 in the treatment scale. ASD cases scored higher on total score and most subscales compared to the kindergarteners (Cohen’s d ranging from 1.34 to 3.37). C_ASRS showed good discriminatory validity with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.850 (95% confidence interval: 0.819–0.881). The cutoff ≥ 60 achieved sensitivity of 65.63% and specificity of 85.63% in discriminating autism children from the general population.

Conclusion

The results indicate that C_ASRS (2–5 years) could be used as an early level-2 screening tool for autism screening in China and should be further revised for level-1 screening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnett R. Autism. Lancet. 2016;387:2082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Doernberg E, Hollander E. Neurodevelopmental disorders (ASD and ADHD): DSM-5, ICD-10, and ICD-11. CNS Spectr. 2016;21:295–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu G, Strathearn L, Liu B, Bao W. Corrected prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among US children and adolescents. JAMA. 2018;319:505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fairthorne J, de Klerk N, Leonard H. Brief report: burden of care in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder or intellectual disability. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016;46:1103–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parish SL, Thomas KC, Williams CS, Crossman MK. Autism and families’ financial burden: the association with health insurance coverage. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015;120:166–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eapen V, Crncec R, Walter A. Clinical outcomes of an early intervention program for preschool children with autism spectrum disorder in a community group setting. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Torjesen I. Early intervention may limit severity of autism symptoms. BMJ. 2016;355:i5776.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reiersen AM. Early identification of autism spectrum disorder: is diagnosis by age 3 a reasonable goal? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56:284–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krug DA, Arick J, Almond P. Behavior checklist for identifying severely handicapped individuals with high levels of autistic behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1980;21:221–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnard-Brak L, Richman DM, Chesnut SR, Little TD. Social Communication Questionnaire scoring procedures for autism spectrum disorder and the prevalence of potential social communication disorder in ASD. Sch Psychol Q. 2016;31:522–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun X, Allison C, Auyeung B, Matthews FE, Zhang Z, Baron-Cohen S, et al. Comparison between a mandarin Chinese version of the childhood autism spectrum test and the clancy autism behaviour scale in mainland China. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35:1599–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun X, Allison C, Auyeung B, Matthews FE, Sharp SJ, Baron-Cohen S, et al. The mandarin Childhood Autism Spectrum Test (CAST): sex differences. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44:2137–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Azad G, Reisinger E, Xie M, Mandell DS. Parent and teacher concordance on the Social Responsiveness Scale for children with autism. Sch Ment Health. 2016;8:368–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong V, Hui LH, Lee WC, Leung LS, Ho PK, Lau WL, et al. A modified screening tool for autism (Checklist for Autism in Toddlers [CHAT-23]) for Chinese children. Pediatrics. 2004;114:e166–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou H, Zhang L, Wu L, Zou X, Luo X, Xia K, et al. Validity and reliability analysis of the Chinese parent version of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (6–18 years). Psychiatry Res. 2015;230:255–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Osail AM, Al-Sheikh MH, Al-Osail EM, Al-Ghamdi MA, Al-Hawas AM, Al-Bahussain AS, et al. Is Cronbach’s alpha sufficient for assessing the reliability of the OSCE for an internal medicine course? BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:582.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Furukawa TA, Leucht S. How to obtain NNT from Cohen’s d: comparison of two methods. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19070.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou B, Zhou H, Wu L, Zou X, Luo X, Fombonne E, et al. Assessing the accuracy of the modified Chinese Autism Spectrum Rating Scale and social responsiveness scale for screening autism spectrum disorder in Chinese children. Neurosci Bull. 2017;33:168–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rice ME, Harris GT. Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law Hum Behav. 2005;29:615–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou H, Zhang L, Luo X, Wu L, Zou X, Xia K, et al. Modifying the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (6–18 years) to a Chinese context: an exploratory factor analysis. Neurosci Bull. 2017;33:175–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou H, Zhang L, Zou X, Luo X, Xia K, Wu L, et al. Chinese norms for the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale. Neurosci Bull. 2017;33:161–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou H, Zhang LL, Yan WL, Xu X, Wang Y. Construct validity of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale of the revised Chinese version. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2015;17:1282–5 (in Chinese).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lai MC, Lombardo MV, Auyeung B, Chakrabarti B, Baron-Cohen S. Sex/gender differences and autism: setting the scene for future research. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;54:11–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fombonne E, Marcin C, Bruno R, Tinoco CM, Marquez CD. Screening for autism in Mexico. Autism Res. 2012;5:180–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Baron-Cohen S. Empathizing, systemizing, and the extreme male brain theory of autism. Prog Brain Res. 2010;186:167–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Baron-Cohen S, Auyeung B, Norgaard-Pedersen B, Hougaard DM, Abdallah MW, Melgaard L, et al. Elevated fetal steroidogenic activity in autism. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20:369–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Song J, Leventhal BL, Koh YJ, Cheon KA, Hong HJ, Kim YK, et al. Cross-cultural aspect of behavior assessment system for children-2, parent rating scale-child: standardization in Korean children. Yonsei Med J. 2017;58:439–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. McClure LA, Boninger ML, Ozawa H, Koontz A. Reliability and validity analysis of the transfer assessment instrument. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:499–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bandos AI, Guo B, Gur D. Estimating the area under ROC curve when the fitted binormal curves demonstrate improper shape. Acad Radiol. 2017;24:209–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cen CQ, Liang YY, Chen QR, Chen KY, Deng HZ, Chen BY, et al. Investigating the validation of the Chinese Mandarin version of the Social Responsiveness Scale in a Mainland China child population. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17:51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Morales-Hidalgo P, Roigé-Castellvi J, Vigil-Colet Sans A, Canals J. The Childhood Autism Spectrum Test (CAST): Spanish adaptation and validation. Autism Res. 2017;10:1491–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Norris M, Lecavalier L. Screening accuracy of level 2 autism spectrum disorder rating scales. A review of selected instruments. Autism. 2010;14:263–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are extremely appreciative of the caregivers of the children who participated in this study.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China (No. 201302002; ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT 02200679) and the Doctor Funding of Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital (GZSYBS [2016]07).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HZ drafted the manuscript, collected the data, and completed the data analysis. CPL drafted the manuscript, collected the data, and completed the data analysis. HZ and CPL contributed equally to this work. YH, XBZ, XRL, LJW, and LZ collected the data. XX revised the manuscript. WLY completed the data analysis and revised the manuscript. YW designed and supervised this study, and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The research was approved by the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University Ethics Board ([2012] No. 185).

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, H., Li, CP., Huang, Y. et al. Reliability and validity of the translated Chinese version of Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (2–5 years). World J Pediatr 15, 49–56 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-018-0201-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-018-0201-3

Keywords

Navigation