Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perceptions of Defendant Culpability in Pretrial Publicity: The Effects of Defendant Ethnicity and Participant Gender

  • Published:
Race and Social Problems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous researchers have found that individuals who are exposed to negative pretrial publicity (PTP) are more likely to judge a defendant guilty than individuals exposed to little or no negative PTP. We examined whether or not minority defendants (black, Aboriginal) are differentially disadvantaged by negative PTP in comparison with white defendants within a Canadian context. Participants read an online newspaper article about a sexual assault case involving a white, black, or Aboriginal defendant and then answered questions regarding defendant culpability and their perceptions of their own abilities to be impartial jurors. The defendant’s ethnicity and the gender of the participant impacted perceptions of defendant culpability. Participants (particularly female participants) generally favored the black defendant and disadvantaged the Aboriginal defendant (in comparison with the white defendant). Despite this fact, participants generally felt they could be impartial and fair jurors. These findings suggest that current procedures for assessing—and trying to avoid—racial biases in jurors are insufficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, D. W., Esses, V. M., & Maio, G. R. (1996). The utility of open-ended measures to assess intergroup ambivalence. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 28(1), 12–18. doi:10.1037/0008-400X.28.1.12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, I. V., Judd, C. M., & Chapleau, K. M. (2004). The influence of Afrocentric facial features in criminal sentencing. Psychological Science, 15(10), 674–679. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00739.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constitution Act (1982). Retrieved May 10th from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-16.html#h-52.

  • Corenblum, B., & Stephan, W. G. (2001). White fears and Native apprehensions: An integrated threat theory approach to intergroup attitudes. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33(4), 251–268. doi:10.1037/h0087147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, J., Park, B., Wittenbrink, B., & Judd, C. M. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 1314–1329. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C., Chiricos, T., & Kleck, G. (1998). Race, racial threat and sentencing of habitual offenders. Criminology, 36(2), 481–511. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01256.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czopp, A. M., & Monteith, M. J. (2006). Thinking well of African Americans: Measuring complimentary stereotypes and negative prejudice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 233–250. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2803_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daftary-Kapur, T., Dumas, R., & Penrod, S. D. (2010). Jury decision-making biases and methods to counter them. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 133–154. doi:10.1348/135532509X465624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice Canada. (2009). Canada’s system of justice. Canada: The Department of Justice Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.56.1.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Dunford, B. B., Seying, R., & Pryce, J. (2001). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(3), 622–727. doi:10.1037//1076-8971.7.3.622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139–1150. doi:10.1177/01461672952111002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, T. L., & Linz, D. (2002). Television news, prejudicial pretrial publicity, and the depiction of race. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 112–136. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donakowski, D. W., & Esses, V. M. (1996). Native Canadians, first nations or aboriginals: The effect of labels on attitudes toward native peoples. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 28, 86–91. doi:10.1037/0008-400X.28.2.86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. E., Kawakami, K., & Hodson, G. (2002). Why can’t we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8(2), 88–102. doi:10.1037//1099-9809.8.2.88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, J. L., Davies, P. G., Purdie-Vaughns, V. J., & Johnson, S. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17(5), 383–386. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01716.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fein, S., Morgan, S. J., Norton, M. I., & Sommers, S. R. (1997). Hype and suspicion: The effects of pretrial publicity, race, and suspicion on jurors’ verdicts. Journal of Social Issues, 53(3), 487–502. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02124.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida department of corrections (2010). Retrieved June 10, 2010, from http://www.dc.state.fl.us/ActiveInmates/search.asp.

  • ForsterLee, R., ForsterLee, L., Horowitz, I. A., & King, E. (2006). The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24, 179–198. doi:10.1002/bsl.675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy, L. S., & Edens, J. F. (2003). Juror decision making in a mock sexually violent predator trial: Gender differences in the impact of divergent types of expert testimony. Behavioral Science and the Law, 21, 215–237. doi:10.1002/bsl.529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackiw, L. B., & Arbuthnott, K. D. (2008). First Nations photographs. Saskatchewan, Canada: University of Regina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maio, G. R., Esses, V. M., & Bell, D. W. (2000). Examining conflict between components of attitudes: Ambivalence and inconsistency are distinct constructs. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32(2), 71–83. doi:10.1037/h0087102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, G., & Cutler, B. L. (1991). The prejudicial impact of pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 181–192. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotenberg, K. J., & Cerda, C. (2001). Racially based trust expectancies of Native American and Caucasian children. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(5), 621–631. doi:10.1080/00224545.1994.9922992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. L., Oswald, D. L., & Kraus, S. W. (2011). Evaluations of sexual assault: Perceptions of guilt and legal elements for male and female aggressors using various coercive strategies. Violence and Victims, 26(6), 799–815. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.26.6.799.

  • Ruva, C., Mcevoy, C., & Bryant, J. B. (2007). Effects of pretrial publicity and jury deliberation on juror bias and source memory errors. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 45–67. doi:10.1002/acp.1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, R. A., Kazoleas, V., & Kawakami, K. (2009). The impact of prejudice screening procedures on racial bias in the courtroom. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 320–328. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9153-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, S. R. (2007). Race and the decision making of juries. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 171–187. doi:10.1348/135532507X189687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (1999). A one-day snapshot of inmates in Canada’s adult correctional facilities, 1999 (No. 85-601-XIE). Ottawa, Ontario: Author. Retrieved from http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/bsolc/olc-cel/olc-cel?catno=85-601-XIE&lang=eng.

  • Steblay, N. M., Besirevic, J., Fulero, S. M., & Jimenez-Lorente, B. (1999). The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts: a meta-analytic review. Law and Human Behavior, 23(2), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, L. T., & Haney, C. (1992). The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 179–195. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370100204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Justice. (2010). Number of state prisoners declined by almost 3,000 during 2009; federal prison population increased by 6,800. Washington: Author.

  • Vandiver, D. M., & Dupalo, J. R. (2013). Factors that affect college students’ perceptions of rape: What is the role of gender and other situational factors? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(5), 592–612. doi:10.1177/0306624X12436797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhun, C. D., & Penner, A. J. (2010). The effects of stereotyping and implicit theory on benevolent prejudice toward Aboriginal Canadians. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 899–916. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00603.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberley A. Clow.

Appendix

Appendix

An example of the newspaper article (Aboriginal condition) .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clow, K.A., Lant, J.M. & Cutler, B.L. Perceptions of Defendant Culpability in Pretrial Publicity: The Effects of Defendant Ethnicity and Participant Gender. Race Soc Probl 5, 250–261 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-013-9102-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-013-9102-1

Keywords

Navigation