Skip to main content
Log in

Cubital tunnel syndrome — Review of current literature on causes, diagnosis and treatment

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hand and Microsurgery

Abstract

Cubital tunnel syndrome is common, but not fully understood. Fortunately, most cases of ulnar nerve compression improve with nonsurgical treatment and large majority get better with surgical decompression. The fact that most people get better with and without surgical treatment is likely the reason that multiple studies have failed to show improved results with different types of decompressions for mild cubital tunnel syndrome. Transposition surgeries have been shown to yield better results with more severe cases and patients who failed previous simple releases, likely secondary to release of other compression sites that were missed by the initial surgery. Knowing more about pathology of the cutbital tunnel syndrome such as compression versus traction injury and having better modalities for evaluation of the nerve should help us to better tailor treatment for the patients in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shin R, Ring D (2007) The ulnar nerve in the elbow trauma. J Bone Joint Surg 89A:1108–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Canale ST, Beaty JH (2008) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. Mosby. 11th ed., Online edition

  3. Pederson W (2005) Green’s operative hand surgery, Elsevier. Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: 5th edn. 1024–1033

  4. Elhassan et al. (2007) Entrapment neuropathy of the ulnar nerve. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:672–681

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gelberman RH (1993) Ulnar tunnel syndrome. Orthopaedics, Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott vol 2, 2nd edn. 1419–1465

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers MR, Bergfield TG, Aulicino PL (1991) The failed ulnar nerve transposition: Etiology and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269:193–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gelberman RH, et al. (1998) Changes in interstitial pressure and cross-sectional area of the cubital tunnel and of the ulnar nerve with flexion of the elbow. An experimental study in human cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:492–501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Macnicol MF (1982) External pressures affecting the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Hand 14:5–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pechan J, Julis I (1975) The pressure measurement in the ulnar nerve. A contribution to the pathophysiology of the cubital tunnel syndrome. J. Biomech. i:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kleinman WB (1999) Cubital tunnel syndrome: Anterior transposition as a logical approach to complete nerve decompression. J Hand Surg 24A:886–897

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chung KC (2008) Treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow. J Hand Surg [Am] 33(9):1625–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bartels RHMA, Menovsky T, Van Overbeeke JJ, Verhangen WIM (1998) Surgical management of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow: an analysis of the literature. J Neurosurg 89:722–727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mowlavi A, Andrews K, Lille S, Verhulst S, Zook EG, Milner S (2000) The management of cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of clinical studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:327–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan RC, Paine KW, Varughese G (1980) Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: Comparison of simple decompression and anterior transposition. Neurosurgery 7(6):545–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davies MA, Vonau M, Blum PW, Kwok BC, Matheson JM, Stening WA (1991) Results of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow treated by decompression or anterior transposition. Aust N Z J Surg. 61(12):929–934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dellon AL (1989) Review of treatment results for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. J Hand Surg [Am] 14(4):688–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernandez E, Pallini R, Lauretti L, Scogna A, La Marca F (1998) Neurosurgery of the peripheral nervous system: cubital tunnel syndrome. Surg Neurol 50:83–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Filippi R et al. (2002) Cubital tunnel syndrome. Treatment by decompression without transposition of the ulnar nerve. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45(3):164–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Heithoff SJ (1999) Cubital tunnel syndrome does not require transposition of the Ulnar Nerve. J Hand Surg [Am] 24(5):898–905

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Michael Zlowodzki et al. (2007) Anterior transposition compared with simple decompression for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. JBJS [Am] 89:2591–2598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kleinman WB, Bishop AT (1989) Anterior intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. J Hand Surg [Am] 14(6):972–979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nabhan A et al. (2005) Simple decompression or subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Br] 30(5):521–524

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gervasio O et al. (2005) Simple decompression versus anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in severe cubital tunnel syndrome: A prospective Randomized Study. Neurosurgery 56(1):108–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Macadam SA et al. (2008) Simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: A meta-analysis. J Hand Surg [Am] 33A: 1314–1324

    Google Scholar 

  25. Macnicol MF (1979) The results of operation for ulnar neuritis. J Bone Joint Surg 61B:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  26. Adelaar RS, et al. (1984) The treatment of the cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Am] 9a(1):90–95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Caputo AE, et al. (2000) Subcutaneous anterior of the ulnar nerve for failed decompression of cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Am] 25(3):544–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gerritsen AA, et al. (2002) Conservative treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Neurology 249(3):272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bultmann C (2009) Results of endoscopic decompression of ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 41(1):28–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Heinen CP et al (2009) The endoscopic management of the cubital tunnel syndrome — an anatomical study and first clinical results. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 41(1):23–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yamaguchi K, Sweet FA, Bindra R, Gelberman RH (1999) The extraneural and intraneural arterial anatomy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(1):17–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bimmler D, Meyer VE (1996) Surgical treatment of the ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy: Submuscular anterior transposition or simple decompression of the ulnar nerve? Long-term results in 79 cases. Ann Chir Main Memb Super 15(3):148–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Keiner D et al. (2009) Comparison of the long-term results of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve or simple decompression in the treatment of the cubital tunnel syndrome — a prospective study. Acta Neurochir 151(4):311–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Goldberg BJ, Light TR, Blair SJ (1989) Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: results of medial epicondylectomy. J Hand Surg [Am] 14: 182–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bart Wojewnik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wojewnik, B., Bindra, R. Cubital tunnel syndrome — Review of current literature on causes, diagnosis and treatment. J Hand Microsurg 1, 76–81 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12593-009-0020-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12593-009-0020-9

Keywords

Navigation