Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A study on coronal incision for treating zygomatic complex fractures

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To study the value of coronal incisions for treating zygomatic complex fractures and evaluate the advantages, indications and complications associated with it.

Method

In this prospective study, 12 patients were randomly selected regardless of age, sex requiring open reduction and internal fixation of communited zygomatic complex fractures with or without other associated fractures of the midface. Patients were all treated by coronal approach for open reduction and internal fixation of fracture of the zygomatic complex. Other local incisions were used if required.

Results

In all cases postoperative complications were relatively minor except in one case were the temporal branch of facial nerve weakness persisted at 3 months. Whereas 5 cases reported with slight weakness of the temporal branch of the facial nerve which resolved at the end of 3 months. The time taken for exposure of the fracture site via the coronal incision had a mean of 28.7 minutes. There were no cases of flap infection and just 1 case of stitch abscess reported. The same case later reported with a hypertrophic scar formation of greater than 0.5cm at 3months. In all other cases scar formation was negligible and well hidden within the hairline. There were no reported cases of paraesthesia at the operated site or hollowing of the temporal fossa.

Conclusion

The coronal incision provides excellent access to the zygomatic arch and zygomatic complex, aiding in good anatomical reduction and also has the added advantage of the scar hidden in the hairline. It also has disadvantages like long operating time, risk of facial nerve injury, scarring in patients with male pattern baldness, paraesthesia of operated site etc. Therefore the incision should be judiciously used and not overused and indications strictly applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang QB, Dong YJ, Li ZB, Zhao JH (2006) Coronal incision for treating zygomatic complex fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 34(3): 182–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pogrel MA, Perott DH, Kaban LB (1991) Bicoronal flap approach to the temperomandibular joints. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 20(4): 219–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kerawala CJ, Grime RJ, Stassen LF, Perry M (2000) The bicoronal flap (craniofacial access): an audit of morbidity and a proposed surgical modification in male pattern baldness. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(5): 441–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shepherd DE, Ward-Booth RP, Moos KF (1985) The morbidity of bicoronal flaps in maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 23(1): 1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Abubaker AO, Sotereanos G, Patternson GT (1990) Use of the coronal surgical incision for reconstruction of severe craniofacial injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(6): 579–586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thangavelu A, Ramesh C, Yoganandha R (2007) Frontotemporal approach for the management of zygomatic complex fractures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 6(2): 11–13

    Google Scholar 

  7. Matic DB, Kim S (2008) Temporal hollowing following coronal incision: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(6): 379e–385e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox AJ, Tatum SA (2003) The Coronal Incision: sinusoidal, sawtooth, and postauricular techniques. Arch Facial Plast Surg 5(3): 259–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Posnick JC, Goldstein JA, Clokie C (1992) Advantages of the postauricular coronal incision. Ann Plast Surg 29(2): 114–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frodel JL, Marentette LJ (1993) The Coronal Approach: Anatomic and technical considerations and morbidity. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119(2): 201–207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marschall MA, Cohen M, Garcia J, Schafer ME (1988) Craniofacial approach for the reconstruction of severe facial injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(4): 305–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gruss JS, Van Wyck L, Phillips JH, Antonyshyn O (1990) The Importance of the zygomatic arch in complex midfacial fracture repair and correction of posttraumatic orbitozygomatic deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 85(6): 878–890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yavuzer R, Jackson IT (1999) Coronal incision extending postauricularly. Plast Reconstr Surg 103(5): 1532–1533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fonseca Raymond J, Robert V. Walter (2005) Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma, Pennsylvania; W.B.Saunders Company, 2nd edition Vol 1: 569–642

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santosh Kumaran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shetty, S.K., Saikrishna, D. & Kumaran, S. A study on coronal incision for treating zygomatic complex fractures. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 8, 160–163 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-009-0039-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-009-0039-2

Keywords

Navigation