Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Are We Similar to Caucasians”: Orthognathic Surgery for North Indians

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primary Aim

To establish the cephalometric standards for hard and soft tissues of the facial skeleton for north Indian population.

Methods

The sample comprised of lateral cephalograms taken in natural head position of 100 participants (50 men, 50 women). The cephalograms were traced, analyzed and interpreted using the landmarks and values given by Burstone’s analysis for hard tissue and Legan and Burstone analysis for soft tissue respectively. The Student’s t test, standard deviation and mean deviation were calculated to compare between the groups.

Results

Statistically significant results were found in various parameters between intra and inter group comparison.

Conclusion

The results obtained in the north Indian population can be used as cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA (1978) Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 36(4):269–277

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Legan HL, Burstone CJ (1980) Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 38:744–751

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arunkumar KV, Reddy VV, Tauro DP (2010) Establishment of cephalometric norms for the south Indian (Karnataka) population based on Burstone’s analysis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 9(2):127–133

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Garcia CJ (1975) Cephalometric evaluation of Mexican Americans using Downs and Steiner analyses. Am J Orthod 68(1):67–74

  5. Engel G, Sploter BM (1981) Cephalometric and visual norms for a Japanese population. Am J Orthod 80(1):48–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bishara SE, Abdalla EM, Hoppens BJ (1990) Cephalometric comparisons of dentofacial parameters between Egyptian and North American adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 97:413–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalha AS, Latiff A, Govardhan SN (2008) Soft tissue cephalometric norms in a south Indian ethnic population. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 133:876–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Connor AM, Moshiri F (1985) Orthognathic surgery norms for American Black patients. Am J Orthod 87(2):119–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park I, Bowman D, Klapper L (1989) A cephalometric study of Korean adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 96:54–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooke MS, Wei SHY (1989) A comparative study of southern Chinese and British Caucasian cephalometric standards. Angle Orthod 59:2

    Google Scholar 

  11. Drummond RA (1968) A determination of cephalometric norms for the Negro race. Am J Orthod 54(9):670–681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nanda R, Nanda RS (1969) Cephalometric study of the dentofacial complex of North Indians. J Indian Dent Assoc 39(1):22–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Behbehani F, Hicks P, Beeman C, Kluemper T, Rayens MK (2006) Racial variation in cephalometric analysis between Whites and Kuwaitis. Angle Orthod 76:406–411

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan AH (2006) Cephalometric norms for Saudi adults living in the western region of Saudi Arabia. Angle Orthod 76:109–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jain P, Kalra JPS (2010) Soft tissue cephalometric norms for a north Indian population group using Legan and Burstone analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg

  16. Valiathan A, John KK (1984) Soft tissue cephalometric analysis of adults from Kerala. J Indian Dent Assoc 56:419–422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alcalde RE, Jinno T, Orsini MG, Sasaki A, Sugiyama RM, Matsumara T (2000) Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 118:84–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hawang HS, Kim WS, McNamara JA (2002) Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European–American adults with normal occlusions and well balanced faces. Angle Orthod 72:72–80

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bacon W, Girardin P, Turlot JC (1983) A comparison of cephalometric norms for the African Bantu and a Caucasoid population. Eur J Orthod 5:233–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Naornova J, Lindman R (2011) A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced. Eur J Orthod 33(3):247–253

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eggensperger N, Smolka W, Rahal A, Jizuka T (2004) Skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement and setback in single-jaw surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62(12):1486–1496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearlman SJ (2006) Surgical treatment of the nasolabial angle in balanced rhinoplasty. Fac Plast Surg 22:28–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors received the support in the form of Grants from D.J. College of Dental Sciences and Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ritesh Garg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garg, R., Alexander, M. “Are We Similar to Caucasians”: Orthognathic Surgery for North Indians. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 14, 271–277 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-014-0636-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-014-0636-6

Keywords

Navigation