Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An evaluation of aquifer vulnerability in two nitrate sensitive areas of Catalonia (NE Spain) based on electrical resistivity methods

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The protection of groundwater has become one of the most important European environmental policies as evidenced by the Orders relating to the protection of water from contamination, Directive 2000/60/CE of the European Parliament and the European Union Council, and more concretely Directive 2006/118/118/CE, related to the protection of groundwater from pollution and degradation. Traditional methods for assessing vulnerability include soil surveys, drilling and analysis of lithology logs from wells with the objective of characterising the thickness, hydraulic properties and lateral extend of the protective layers. However, such studies can be labour-intensive and expensive. In addition, the parameters measured may have high spatial variability, which makes accurate characterization over large areas difficult. Fortunately, a numerical index of protection can be assigned from the longitudinal electrical conductance parameter derived from electrical resistivity surveys (VES, ERT or any other electrical or EM method). This can be more accurate and reliable than any other vulnerability index derived only from visual inspection or interpolated from sparse borehole data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aller L, Bennet T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. US EPA, 600/2-87–035

  • Anderson LJ, Gosk E (1989) Applicability of vulnerability maps. Environ Geol Water Sci 13:39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Himi M, Díaz Y, Pinto V, Font X, Tapias JC (2008) Assessing aquifer vulnerability to pollutants by electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) at a nitrate vulnerable. Environ Geol 54:515–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin T (1996) 2D Resistivity surveying for environmental and engineering applications. First Break 14:275–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster SSD (1987) Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy: In: van Duijvenbooden W, van Waegeningh HG (eds) TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants, Proc Inf, vol 38, pp 69–86

  • Henriet JP (1975) Direct applications of the Dar Zarrouk parameters in ground water surveys. Geophys Prospect 24:344–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölting B, Haertlé Th, Hohberger KH, Nachtigall K, Villinger E, Weinzierl W, Wrobel JP (1995) Konzept zur Ermittlung der Schutzfunktion der Grundwasserüberdeckung. –Geologisches Jahrbuch, vol C 63, pp 5–24

  • Kalinski RJ, Kelly WE, Bogardi I, Pesti G (1993) Electrical resistivity measurements to estimate travel times through unsaturated ground water protective layers. J Appl Geophys 30:161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch R (2006) Groundwater Geophysics. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch R, Sengpiel KP, Voss W (2003) The use of electrical conductivity mapping in the definition of an aquifer vulnerability index. Near Surf Geophys 1(1):13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Loke MH (2002) RES2DINV ver. 3.50. Rapid 2-D resistivity and IP inversion using the least square method. Geotomo Software. Penang, Malaysia

  • Loke MH, Barker RD (1996) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophys Prospect 44:131–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillet R (1947) The fundamental equations of electric prospecting. Geophysics 12:529–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupert MG (2001) Calibration of the DRASTIC ground water vulnerability mapping method. Ground Water 39(4):625–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Stempvoort D, Ewert L, Wassenaar L (1993) Aquifer vulnerability index. A GIS-compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Can Water Resour J 18(1):25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation through the research project “Relationships between hydrogeological and geophysical parameters for assessing aquifer vulnerability” (CGL2009-07025) and the project “Waste water treatment and reuse for a sustainable management, TRAGUA” (CSD2006-00044) in the framework of the Consolider programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. Tapias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sendròs, A., Diaz, Y., Himi, M. et al. An evaluation of aquifer vulnerability in two nitrate sensitive areas of Catalonia (NE Spain) based on electrical resistivity methods. Environ Earth Sci 71, 77–84 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2696-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2696-1

Keywords

Navigation