Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

β-Blocker therapy and cardiovascular outcomes in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention after ST-elevation myocardial infarction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of β-blockers in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who have undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been adequately evaluated. Using a large multi-center registry in Japan, we identified 3,692 patients who underwent PCI within 24 h from onset of STEMI and were discharged alive from 2005 to 2007. Three-year cardiovascular outcomes were compared between the 2 groups of patients with (N = 1,614) or without (N = 2,078) β-blocker prescription at discharge. Compared with patients in the no-β group, patients in the β group were younger, more frequently male, more often had hypertension and atrial fibrillation but less often had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease than in the no-β group. Statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers were more frequently prescribed in the β group. Crude incidence of cardiac death and/or recurrent myocardial infarction (cardiac death/MI) tended to be higher in the β group (7.6 vs. 6.2 %, log-rank p = 0.1). After adjusting for potential confounders, β-blockers were associated with significantly higher risk for cardiac death/MI (hazard ratio 1.43, 95 % CI: 1.06–1.94, p = 0.01). β-Blocker prescription at discharge was not associated with better cardiovascular outcomes in patients who underwent PCI after STEMI. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the role of β-blocker therapy in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction–executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. 2004;110:588–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Crea F, Falk V, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2909–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beta-blocker Heart Attack Study Group. The Βeta-blocker heart-attack trial. JAMA. 1981;246:2073–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Freemantle N, Cleland J, Young P, Mason J, Harrison J. β blockade after myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta regression analysis. BMJ. 1999;318:1730–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kernis SJ, Harjai KJ, Stone GW, Grines LL, Boura JA, O’Neill WW, et al. Does β-blocker therapy improve clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction after successful primary angioplasty? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1773–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozasa N, Kimura T, Morimoto T, Hou H, Tamura T, Shizuta S, et al. Lack of effect of oral β-blocker therapy at discharge on long-term clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:1225–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Serruys PW, Ong ATL, van Herwerden LA, Sousa JE, Jatene A, Bonnier JJRM, et al. Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease—the final analysis of the arterial revascularization therapies study (ARTS) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:575–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kimura T, Morimoto T, Nakagawa Y, Tamura T, Kadota K, Yasumoto H, et al. Antiplatelet therapy and stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circulation. 2009;119:U120–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghali WA, Quan H, Brant R, van Melle G, Norris CM, Faris PD, et al. Comparison of 2 methods for calculating adjusted survival curves from proportional hazards models. JAMA. 2001;286:1494–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Parsons LS. Reducing bias in a propensity score matched pair sample using greedy matching techniques. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.; 2001.

  11. Kohro T, Hayashi D, Yamazaki T, JCAD Investigators. Beta-blocker prescription among Japanese cardiologists and its effect on various outcomes. Circ J. 2010;74:962–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kasanuki H, Honda T, Haze K, Sumiyoshi T, Horie T, Yagi M, et al. A large-scale prospective cohort study on the current status of therapeutic modalities for acute myocardial infarction in Japan: rationale and initial results of the HIJAMI Registry. Am Heart J. 2005;150:411–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. The Japanese β-blockers and Calcium Antagonists Myocardial Infarction (JBCMI) Investigators. Comparison of the effects of β blockers and calcium antagonists on cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction in Japanese subjects. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:969–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Beevers G, de Faire U, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002;359:995–1003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dahlof B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:895–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindholm LH, Carlberg B, Samuelsson O. Should β blockers remain first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension? A meta-analysis. Lancet. 2005;366:1545–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kopecky SL. Effect of β blockers, particularly carvedilol, on reducing the risk of events after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:1115–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cimmino G, Ibanez B, Giannarelli C, Prat-Gonzalez S, Hutter R, Garcia M, Sanz J, Fuster V, Badimon JJ. Carvedilol administration in acute myocardial infarction results in stronger inhibition of early markers of left ventricular remodeling than metoprolol. Int J Cardiol. 2011;153:256–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dargie HJ. Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;357:1385–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bristow MR, Gilbert EM, Abraham WT, Adams KF, Fowler MB, Hershberger RE, MOCHA Investigators, et al. Carvedilol produces dose-related improvements in left ventricular function and survival in subjects with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 1996;94:2807–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mehta RH, Starr AZ, Lopes RD, Hochman JS, Widimsky P, Pieper KS, et al. Incidence of and outcomes associated with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2009;301:1779–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Xie HG, Kim RB, Wood AJ, Stein CM. Molecular basis of ethnic differences in drug disposition and response. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2001;41:815–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hori M, Sasayama S, Kitabatake A, Toyo-oka T, Handa S, Yokoyama M, et al. Low-dose carvedilol improves left ventricular function and reduces cardiovascular hospitalization in Japanese patients with chronic heart failure: the Multicenter Carvedilol Heart Failure Dose Assessment (MUCHA) trial. Am Heart J. 2004;147:324–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ho PM, Spertus JA, Masoudi FA, Reid KJ, Peterson ED, Magid DJ, et al. Impact of medication therapy discontinuation on mortality after myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1842–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Butler J, Arbogast PG, BeLue R, Daugherty J, Jain MK, Ray WA, et al. Outpatient adherence to β-blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1589–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All authors have contributed to the design of the study, interpretation of results, revising the manuscript, and approve the final version of the manuscript. We thank the members of the cardiac catheterization laboratories of the participating centers and the clinical research coordinators (Supplemental Appendix). This study was supported by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) in Japan.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neiko Ozasa.

Additional information

On behalf of the CREDO-Kyoto AMI registry investigators.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 281 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bao, B., Ozasa, N., Morimoto, T. et al. β-Blocker therapy and cardiovascular outcomes in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 28, 139–147 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-012-0137-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-012-0137-9

Keywords

Navigation