Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Unique Interactive Cognitive Behavioral Training Program for Front-Line Cancer Care Professionals

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For between one third and one half of all cancer survivors, disturbances in mood and cognition do not end with the conclusion of treatment. Recognizing this problem, the Institute of Medicine emphasized in its 2008 report, the importance of addressing psychosocial issues, such as distress, to providing quality cancer care. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has recognized that there is a severe lack of trained professionals who can address these needs. In response to this need, an interactive training program was developed and implemented to teach frontline cancer care professionals Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) skills. This training includes a structured curriculum, centered around a 3-day training workshop that includes didactic discussion, small group interactive sessions, role playing, post course support, and follow-up evaluation. Four of the planned eight workshops have been conducted thus far and indicate successful recruitment and implementation of a unique training model related to the CBT skills learned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zabora JR, Loscalzo MJ, Weber J (2003) Managing complications in cancer: identifying and responding to the patients perspective. Semin Oncol Nurs 19:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Distress Management (2012) http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp3. Accessed 23 July 2012

  3. Smith MY, Redd W, DuHamel K, Vickberg SJ, Ricketts P (1999) Validation of the PTSD checklist–civilian version in survivors of bone marrow transplantation. J Trauma Stress 12(3):485–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mosher CE, Redd WH, Rini CM, Burkhalter JE, DuHamel KN (2009) Physical, psychological, and social sequelae following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a review of the literature. Psycho-Oncology 18(2):113–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Institute of Medicine (2008) In: N. E. A. a. A. E. K. Page (ed) Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  6. Manne SL, Andrykowski MA (2006) Are psychological interventions effective and accepted by cancer patients? II. Using empirically supported therapy guidelines to decide. Ann Behav Med 32(2):98–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Owen JE, Klapow JC, Hicken B, Tucker DC (2001) Psychosocial interventions for cancer: review and analysis using a three-tiered outcomes model. Psycho-Oncology 10(3):218–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tatrow K, Montgomery G (2006) Cognitive behavioral therapy techniques for distress and pain in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis. J Behav Med 29(1):17–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Osborn RL, Demoncada AC, Feuerstein M (2006) Psychosocial interventions for depression, anxiety, and quality of life in cancer survivors: meta-analyses. Int J Psychiatry Med 36(1):13–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Savard J, Simard S, Giguere I, Ivers H, Morin CM, Maunsel E, Marceau D (2006) Randomized clinical trial on cognitive therapy for depression in women with metastatic breast cancer: psychological and immunological effects. Palliat support Care 4(03):219–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson BL, Farrar WB, Golden-Kreutz DM, Glaser R, Emery CF, Crespin TR, Carson WE III (2005) Psychological, behavioral, and immune changes after a psychological intervention: a clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 22:3570–3580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Semple CJ, Dunwoody L, Sullivan K, Kernohan WG (2006) Patients with head and neck cancer prefer individualized cognitive behavioural therapy. Eur J Cancer Care 15(3):220–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boesen EH, Ross L, Frederiksen K, Thomsen BL, Dahlstram K, Schmidt G, Johansen C (2005) Psychoeducational intervention for patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma: a replication study. J Clin Oncol 23(6):1270–1277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Penedo F, Traeger L, Dahn J, Molton I, Gonzalez J, Schneiderman N, Antoni M (2007) Cognitive behavioral stress management intervention improves quality of life in Spanish monolingual Hispanic men treated for localized prostate cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Med 14(3):164–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. DuHamel KN, Mosher CE, Winkel G, Labay LE, Rini C, Meschian YM, Redd WH (2010) Randomized clinical trial of telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy to reduce post-traumatic stress disorder and distress symptoms after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 28(23):3754–3761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Townend M (2005) Interprofessional supervision from the perspectives of both mental health nurses and other professionals in the field of cognitive behavioural psychotherapy. J Psychiatr Ment Heal Nurs 12(5):582–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Knowles MS (1980) The modern practicve of adult education: from pedagogy to andragogy. Cambridge Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bandura A (1994) Self-efficacy. In: Ramachandran V (ed) Encyclopedia of human behavior. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schunk DM (1995) Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In: Maddux JE (ed) Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: theory, research and application. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. W.H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Clark.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, K., Greene, P., DuHamel, K. et al. A Unique Interactive Cognitive Behavioral Training Program for Front-Line Cancer Care Professionals. J Canc Educ 27, 649–655 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0425-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0425-1

Keywords

Navigation