Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving Communication on Intent of Chemotherapy Using QOPI Scores and PDSA Cycles

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using the standardized ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) guidelines for assessing quality cancer care, we identified communication about intent of chemotherapy as an area needing improvement in our program at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) and the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (CAVHS). We organized training in communications on intent of treatment (palliative vs curative) and added optional checkboxes to our electronic templates for progress notes. Afterwards, we conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records of initially often randomly selected patient charts. The first 10 patient charts after 1 month of implementation showed intent of treatment in 80 % of charts compared to 74 % at baseline. We then changed checkboxes from mandatory to optional and reviewed 30 randomly selected patient charts. Intent of treatment was documented in 96.7 % of cases compared to 74 % at baseline. We also assessed patient satisfaction through surveys distributed in clinic. Patient satisfaction scores were close to 100 % for receiving clear information, understanding the reason for which they were receiving chemotherapy, and willingness of oncologists to listen carefully, to take time to answer questions, to explain things clearly, and to spend adequate time with them. In this study, we showed that training in communication of intent of chemotherapy and use of checkboxes in progress note templates could improve competency in communication of intent of therapy in cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McNiff K (2006) The quality oncology practice initiative: assessing and improving care within the medical oncology practice. J Oncol Pract 2(1):26–30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. http://www.iom.edu/About-IOM.aspx. The Institute of Medicine of the National Academics

  3. American Society of Clinical Oncology: The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative, 2009. http://qopi.asco.org/32

  4. Moen R, Norman C (2006) Evolution of the PDCA cycle

  5. Speroff T, O’Connor GT (2004) Study designs for PDSA quality improvement research. Qual Manag Health Care 13:17–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cushing A, Abbott S, Lothian D, Hall A, Westwood OM (2011) Peer feedback as an aid to learning--what do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now! Med Teach 33(2):e105–e112. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.542522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hill E, Liuzzi F, Giles J (2010) Peer-assisted learning from three perspectives: student, tutor and co-ordinator. Clin Teach 7(4):244–246. doi:10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00399.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buckman R, Kason Y (1992) How to break bad news: a guide for health care professionals. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Al-Ola Abdallah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bansal, M., Abdallah, AO., Pennisi, A. et al. Improving Communication on Intent of Chemotherapy Using QOPI Scores and PDSA Cycles. J Canc Educ 31, 736–741 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0897-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0897-x

Keywords

Navigation