Abstract
Understanding the appropriate medium to communicate health promotion messages is vital for improving personal and societal health. As increasingly more people utilize social media for health information, public health practitioners use these platforms to engage an existing audience in health promotion messages. In this study, the relational framing theory was used as a lens for studying how message framing may influence social media audience engagement. Specifically, we assessed how posts from Tobacco Free Florida’s Facebook page were framed as either dominant-submissive or affiliate-disaffiliate to an implied audience of either smokers, nonsmokers, active quitters, or a mixed audience, and the extent to which a direct call for engagement, in terms of a request to comment, like, or share the post, was used for audience engagement. A three-way interaction for the level of engagement through comments was significant, F(3217) = 7.11, p < .001, ηp 2 = .09, and showed that framing, a call for engagement, and varying implied audience choice played a role in audience engagement with smoking cessation posts on social media. Implied audiences of Tobacco Free Florida’s posts included smokers, those who are trying to quit, and nonsmokers as health promotion can be targeted at the individual’s health, social support infrastructure, or the well-being of the society, and implications for strategic message design and audience targeting are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization. 2016. Health promotion.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011. The Health Communicator’s Social Media Toolkit.
Perrin, Andrew. 2015. Social media usage: 2005–2015.
Neiger BL, Thackeray R, Burton SH, Giraud-Carrier CG, Fagen MC (2013) Evaluating social media’s capacity to develop engaged audiences in health promotion settings: use of Twitter metrics as a case study. Health Promot Pract 14:157–162. doi:10.1177/1524839912469378
Kreuter MW, Wray RJ (2003) Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav 27:S227–S232
Dillard JP, Solomon DH, Samp JA (1996) Framing social reality: the relevance of relational judgments. Commun Res 23:703–723. doi:10.1177/009365096023006004
McLaren, Rachel M., and Denise Haunani Solomon. 2014. Relational framing theory. In Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication: Multiple Perspectives, ed. D. O. Braitwaite and P. Schrodt, 115–127.
Strekalova, Yulia A. 2016. Health risk information engagement and amplification on social media: News about an emerging pandemic on Facebook. Health Education & Behavior: 1090198116660310. doi:10.1177/1090198116660310.
Solomon DH, Dillard JP, Anderson JW (2002) Episode type, attachment orientation, and frame salience: evidence for a theory of relational framing. Hum Commun Res 28:136–152. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00801.x
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2012. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE.
Burgoon JK, Johnson ML, Koch PT (1998) The nature and measurement of interpersonal dominance. Commun Monogr 65:308–335. doi:10.1080/03637759809376456
Mccroskey JC, Richmond VP, Daly JA (1975) The development of a measure of perceived momophily in interpersonal communication. Hum Commun Res 1:323–332. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00281.x
Picanço L, Biancovilli P, Jurberg C (2016) Beyond the drama: the beautiful life in news feeds on cancer. J Cancer Educ:1–5. doi:10.1007/s13187-016-1094-2
Graham H (2012) Smoking, stigma and social class. Journal of Social Policy 41:83–99. doi:10.1017/S004727941100033X
Riege A, Lindsay N (2006) Knowledge management in the public sector: stakeholder partnerships in the public policy development. J Knowl Manag 10:24–39. doi:10.1108/13673270610670830
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Strekalova, Y.A., Damiani, R.E. Message Design and Audience Engagement with Tobacco Prevention Posts on Social Media. J Canc Educ 33, 668–672 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1135-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1135-x