Skip to main content
Log in

Die Arbeitsgruppen für Datenbanken und Informationssysteme an der TU Kaiserslautern

  • Datenbankgruppen vorgestellt
  • Published:
Datenbank-Spektrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag geben wir einen Überblick über die Forschungsprojekte im Bereich Datenbanken und Informationssysteme (DBIS), die in den letzten Jahren an der TU Kaiserslautern durchgeführt wurden, bevor wir unsere aktuellen Forschungsthemen skizzieren. Desweiteren beschreiben wir unsere DBIS-bezogenen Lehraufgaben für das Bachelor- und Master-Studium, die im Lehrgebiet Informationssysteme des Fachbereichs Informatik angeboten werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Alvanaki F, Michel S (2014) Tracking set correlations at large scale. In: Proc. SIGMOD. S 1507–1518

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bühmann A, Härder T (2007) Making the Most of Cache Groups. In: Proc. DASFAA Bangkok. LNCS, Bd. 4443. S 349–360

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bächle S, Härder T (2010) A Scalable Framework for Serializable XQuery (keynote paper). In: Proc. NDT 2010. CCIS, Bd. 88. S 683–698

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bächle S, Härder T, Haustein MP (2009) Implementing and Optimizing Fine-Granular Lock Management for XML Document Trees. In: Proc. DASFAA Brisbane, Australia. LNCS, Bd. 5463. S 631–645

    Google Scholar 

  5. Behrend A, Jörg T (2010) Optimized incremental ETL jobs for maintaining data warehouses. In: Proc. IDEAS. S 216–224

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bächle S, Sauer C (2014) Unleashing XQuery for Data-independent Programming. Datenbank-Spektrum 14(2):135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Göres J, Deßloch S (2007) Towards an Integrated Model for Data, Metadata, and Operations. In: Proc. BTW. S 212–226

    Google Scholar 

  8. Göres J, Deßloch S (2008) A metadata management framework for dynamic information integration. Concurr Comput Pract Exp 20(17):2009–2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Göres J, Jörg T, Stumm B, Deßloch S (2009) GEM: A generic visualization and editing facility for heterogeneous metadata. Comput Sci – Res Dev 24(3):119–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Graefe G, Guy W, Sauer C (2016) Instant recovery with write-ahead logging: page repair, system restart, media restore, and system failover, 2. Aufl. Synthesis Lectures on Data Management. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, CA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gao S, Xu J, Härder T, He B, Choi B, Hu H (2015) PCMLogging: Optimizing Transaction Logging and Recovery Performance with PCM. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 27(12):3332–3346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Härder T (2005) XML Databases and Beyond – Plenty of Architectural Challenges Ahead (Invited Paper). In: Proc. ADBIS, LNCS, Bd. 3631. S 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  13. Härder T, Bühmann A (2008) Value Complete, Column Complete, Predicate Complete – Magic Words Driving the Design of Cache Groups. VLDB J 17(4):805–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Härder T, Bühmann A (2004) Query Processing in Constraint-Based Database Caches. Data Eng Bull 27(2):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hu Y, Deßloch S (2014) Extracting deltas from column oriented NoSQL databases for different incremental applications and diverse data targets. Data Knowl Eng 93:42–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu Y, Deßloch S (2015) Temporal Data Management and Processing with Column Oriented NoSQL Databases. J Database Manag 26(3):41–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haustein MP, Härder T (2004) Adjustable Transaction Isolation in XML Database Management Systems. In: Proc. XSym, Bd. 3186. S 173–188

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haustein MP, Härder T (2007) An Efficient Infrastructure for Native Transactional XML Processing. Data Knowl Eng 61(3):500–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haustein MP, Härder T (2008) Optimizing Lock Protocols for Native XML Processing. Data Knowl Eng 65(1):147–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Haustein MP, Härder T, Luttenberger K (2006) Contest of XML Lock Protocols. In: Proc. VLDB. S 1069–1080

    Google Scholar 

  21. Härder T, Haustein MP, Mathis C, Wagner M (2007) Node Labeling Schemes for Dynamic XML Documents Reconsidered. Data Knowl Eng 60(1):126–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Härder T, Hudlet V, Ou Y, Schall D (2011) Energy Efficiency is not Enough, Energy Proportionality is Needed! (keynote paper). In: Proc. DASFAA’11, Int. Workshop on FlashDB, Bd. 6637. S 226–239

    Google Scholar 

  23. Härder T, Mathis C, Bächle S, Schmidt K, Weiner AM (2010) Essential Performance Drivers in Native XML DBMSs (Invited Paper). In: Proc. Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science, LNCS, Bd. 5901. S 29–46

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoffmann M, Milchevski E, Michel S (2016) Playing LEGO with JSON: Probabilistic joins over attribute-value fragments. In: Proc. KEYS. S 173–180

    Google Scholar 

  25. Izadi K, Härder T, Haghjoo MS (2008) S3: Evaluation of Tree-Pattern Queries Supported by Structural Summaries. Data Knowl Eng 68:126–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ilieva E, Michel S, Stupar A (2013) The essence of knowledge (bases) through entity rankings. In: Proc. CIKM. S 1537–1540

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jörg T, Deßloch S (2009) Formalizing ETL Jobs for Incremental Loading of Data Warehouses. In: Proc. BTW. S 327–346

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jörg T, Deßloch S (2011) View Maintenance using Partial Deltas. In: Proc. BTW. S 287–306

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jin P, Ou Y, Härder T, Li Z (2012) AD-LRU: An Efficient Buffer Replacement Algorithm for Flash-Based Databases. Data Knowl Eng 72:83–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mathis C (2007) Extending a Tuple-Based XPath Algebra to Enhance Evaluation Flexibility. Inform – Forsch Entwickl 21(3):147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mathis C, Härder T, Haustein MP (2006) Locking-Aware Structural Join Operators for XML Query Processing. In: Proc. SIGMOD. S 467–478

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mathis C, Härder T, Schmidt K (2009) Storing and Indexing XML Documents Upside Down. Comput Sci – Res Dev 24(1-2):51–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mathis C, Härder T, Schmidt K, Bächle S (2015) XML Indexing and Storage: Fulfilling the Wish List. Comput Sci – Res Dev 30(1):51–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Milchevski E, Michel S (2015) ligDB – Online Query Processing Without (almost) any Storage. In: Proc. EDBT. S 683–688

    Google Scholar 

  35. Milchevski E, Anand A, Michel S (2015) The Sweet Spot between Inverted Indices and Metric-Space Indexing for Top-K-List Similarity Search. In: Proc EDBT. S 253–264

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ou Y, Härder T, Jin P (2009) CFDC – A Flash-aware Replacement Policy for Database Buffer Management. In: Proc. SIGMOD Workshop „Data Management on New Hardware (DaMoN)“

    Google Scholar 

  37. Koninika P, Michel S (2016) Efficient Similarity Search across Top-k Lists under the Kendall’s Tau Distance. In: Proc. SSDBM. S 6:1–6:12

    Google Scholar 

  38. Panev K, Michel S (2016) Reverse Engineering Top-k Database Queries with PALEO. In: Proc. EDBT. S 113–124

    Google Scholar 

  39. Panev K, Michel S, Milchevski E, Koninika P (2016) Exploring Databases via Reverse Engineering Ranking Queries with PALEO. PVLDB 9(13):1525–1528

    Google Scholar 

  40. Qu W, Basavaraj V, Shankar S, Deßloch S (2015) Real-Time Snapshot Maintenance with Incremental ETL Pipelines in Data Warehouses. In: Proc. DaWaK. S 217–228

    Google Scholar 

  41. Qu W, Shankar S, Ganza S, Deßloch S (2015) HBelt: Integrating an Incremental ETL Pipeline with a Big Data Store for Real-Time Analytics. In: Proc. ADBIS. S 123–137

    Google Scholar 

  42. Reinartz F, Koninika P, Michel S (2016) Mining Entity Rankings. Datenbank-Spektrum 16(1):27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ribeiro L, Härder T (2011) Generalizing Prefix Filtering to Improve Set Similarity Joins. Inf Syst 36(1):62–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Stumm B, Deßloch S (2007) Change Management in Large Information Infrastructures – Representing and Analyzing Arbitrary Metadata. In: Proc. BTW. S 172–191

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schildgen J, Deßloch S (2015) NotaQL Is Not a Query Language! It’s for Data Transformation on Wide-Column Stores. In: Proc. BICOD. S 139–151

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schildgen J, Deßloch S (2015) SQL-Grundlagen spielend lernen mit dem Text-Adventure SQL Island (Demo Paper). In: Proc. BTW. S 687–690

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sauer C, Graefe G, Härder T (2015) Single-pass restore after a media failure. In: Proc. BTW, LNI, Bd. 241. S 217–236

    Google Scholar 

  48. Schmidt K, Härder T (2008) Usage-driven Storage Structures for Native XML Databases. In: Proc. Int. Symp. on Database Engineering. S 169–178

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schmidt K, Härder T (2010) On the Use of Query-driven XML Auto-Indexing. In: Proc. Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW). S 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schall D, Härder T (2014) WattDB – A Journey towards Energy Efficiency. Datenbank-Spektrum 14(3):183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Schall D, Härder T (2015) Dynamic Physiological Partitioning on a Shared-nothing Database Cluster. In: Proc. ICDE. S 1095–1106

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schall D, Härder T (2015) Energy and Performance – Can a Wimpy-Node Cluster Challenge a Brawny Server? In: Proc. BTW, Bd. 241. S 197–216

    Google Scholar 

  53. Schildgen J, Jörg T, Hoffmann M, Dessloch S (2014) Marimba: A Framework for Making MapReduce Jobs Incremental. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Congress on Big Data. S 128–135

    Google Scholar 

  54. Schildgen J, Lottermann T, Deßloch S (2016) Cross-system NoSQL data transformations with NotaQL. In: Proc. BeyondMR@SIGMOD

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sauer C, Lersch L, Härder T, Graefe G (2016) Update propagation strategies for high-performance OLTP (best paper award). In: Proc. ADBIS. LNCS, Bd. 9809. S 152–165

    Google Scholar 

  56. Weiner A, Härder T (2010) A Framework for Cost-Based Query Optimization in Native XML Database Management Systems. In: Advanced Applications and Structures in XML Processing: Label Streams, Semantics Utilization, and Data Query Technologies. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, S 160–182

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Zusätzlich zur Grundausstattung durch das Land Rheinland-Pfalz wurden unsere Projekte durch Drittmittel folgender Institutionen unterstützt: Förderung von 8 Projekten im DFG-Normalverfahren und von 3 Projekten im Rahmen von Exzellenzprogrammen des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz, DAAD-Förderung eines Projektes mit der Hongkong Baptist University sowie ein Promotionsstipendium der Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung. Weiterhin erhielten wir mehrere Ph.D. Fellowship Awards der IBM und einen Research Award von Google.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theo Härder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deßloch, S., Härder, T. & Michel, S. Die Arbeitsgruppen für Datenbanken und Informationssysteme an der TU Kaiserslautern. Datenbank Spektrum 16, 237–245 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13222-016-0235-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13222-016-0235-4

Navigation