Abstract
The modern era of infertility treatment was heralded over half a century ago with the introduction of new hormonal drugs that could effectively induce ovarian ovulation. However, it was quickly recognized that the birth of these new “miracle drugs” was associated with a remarkable increase in the incidence of high-order multiple births. Despite the fantastic improvement in our ability to monitor ovarian response during ovulation induction, and our power to control the number of embryos introduced into the womb through IVF, multiple births remain a leading cause of long-term child morbidity among infertility patients. Efforts to prevent what was coined in the 1960s as the “multiple birth epidemic” remain an urgent concern. A new body of research clearly points at our capacity to reduce the risk of multiple births and their associated long term morbidity without diminishing current high success rates of infertility treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lunenfeld B. Historical perspectives in gonadotropin therapy. Hum Reprod. 2004;10:453–67.
Beall SA, Decherney A. History and challenges surrounding ovarian stimulation in the treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:795–801.
Janvier A, Spelke B, Barrington KJ. The epidemic of multiple gestations and neonatal intensive care unit use: the cost of irresponsibility. J Pediatr. 2011;159:409–13.
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980–2009. NCHS data brief, no 80. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012.
Blondel B, Kaminski M. Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26:239–49.
Ooki S. Estimation of the contribution of assisted and non-assisted reproductive technology fertility treatments to multiple births during the past 30 years in Japan: 1979–2008. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2011;14:476–83.
Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28:220–50.
Herbert DL, Lucke JC, Dobson AJ. Birth outcomes after spontaneous or assisted conception among infertile Australian women aged 28 to 36 years: a prospective, population-based study. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:630–8.
McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148:105–13.
Roca-de Bes M, Gutierrez-Maldonado J, Gris-Martinez JM. Comparative study of the psychological risks associated with families with multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology (ART) and without ART. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:170–4.
Connolly MP, Hoorens S, Chambers GM, ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:603–13.
Bromer JG, Ata B, Seli M, et al. Preterm deliveries that result from multiple pregnancies associated with assisted reproductive technologies in the USA: a cost analysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23:168–73.
Sentilhes L, Audibert F, Dommerques M, et al. Multifetal pregnancy reduction: indications, technical aspects and psychological impact. Presse Med. 2008;37:295–306.
Tadin I, Roje D, Banovic I, et al. Fetal reduction in multifetal pregnancy—ethical dilemmas. Yonsei Med J. 2002;43:252–8.
Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Practice committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:835–42.
Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2392–402.
Grady R, Alavi N, Vale R, et al. Elective single embryo transfer and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:324–31.
Kato K, Takehara Y, Seqawa T, et al. Minimal ovarian stimulation combined with elective single embryo transfer policy: age-specific results of large, single-centre, Japanese cohort. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:35.
McClamrock HD, Jones HW Jr, Adashi EY. Ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination at the quarter centennial: implications for the multiple births epidemic. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:802–9.
Jones CA, Christensen AL, Salihu H, et al. Prediction of individual probabilities of live birth and multiple birth events following in vitro fertilization (IVF): a new outcomes counseling tool for IVF providers and patients using HFEA metrics. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2011;8:3.
Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance—United States, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2005;54:1–24.
Reynolds MA, Schieve LA. Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996–2002. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:694–700.
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1856–64.
Min JK, Claman P, Hughes E, et al. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102:203–16.
Min JK, Hughes E, Young D, et al. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:363–77.
Practice committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1518–9.
Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:107–20.
Ata B, Seli E. Economics of assisted reproductive technologies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:183–8.
Veleva Z, Karinen P, Tomas C, et al. Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1632–9.
Bensdorp AJ, Slappendel E, Koks C, et al. The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility. BMC Womens Health. 2009;9:35.
McKelvey A, David AL, Shenfield F, et al. The impact of cross-border reproductive care or “fertility tourism” on NHS maternity service. BJOG. 2009;116:1520–3.
Culley L, Hudson N, Rapport F, et al. Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travelers. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2373–81.
Storrow RF. The pluralism problem in cross-border reproductive care. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2939–43.
Hopkins L, Labonte R, Runnels V, et al. Medical tourism today: what is the state of existing knowledge? J Public Health Policy. 2010;31:185–98.
Jones HW Jr, Cooke I, Kempers R, et al. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010: preface. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:491.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avraham, S., Seidman, D.S. The Multiple Birth Epidemic: Revisited. J Obstet Gynecol India 62, 386–390 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-012-0309-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-012-0309-7